nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
Absolutely!!!
Joe Biden: “No Amendment To The Constitution Is Absolute”
- Thread starter livingston
- Start date
Absolutely!!!
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
The modern producers in the world are slaves in that taxes are not voluntary.
This is what we have been turned into. We are no more than batteries to run the matrix.
C3D
.338 Win Mag
Here's the problem and why our country is totally screwed.
About half of the country COMPLETELY, morally, philosophically, logically and emotionally disagrees with what the leader and the other half thinks.
There.is.no.middle.ground.
There is no room for compromise.
Biden can decree whatever the hell he wants and our treasonous legislature and fundamentally transformed SCOTUS can all go along with it.
Yet, IT. WON'T. MATTER.
Because, the other 50% (us) of the country will willingly become "outlaws" because they feel their position is moral, just and absolute. It doesn't matter what the king says if less than half the country agrees. It's just taking us down the path for one hell of a reckoning.
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Deplorable Me
.700 Nitro Express
Still not my president.
BTW, it is not unlawful to tell fire in a movie theater.
The actions that people take, if they are harmed, could come back to you but not the word fire!
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Our rights are inalienable.
inalienable
: incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred,inalienable rights
Other Words from inalienable
An inalienable right, said Richard Foltin of the Freedom Forum Institute, is “a right that can't be restrained or repealed by human laws.” Sometimes called natural rights, inalienable rights “flow from our nature as free people.” ... Instead, it is a government's job to protect inalienable rights
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
LT. COLONEL ALLEN WEST: MESSAGE FOR JOE BIDEN
This occurs all of the time. I am not sticking up for Biden, but, he said Amendments are not absolute; not Rights.
Again, I hate the man and am not sticking up for him.... But, a small hypothetical...
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This is the current 2A. What is it were to be altered to say something like this...
The Right of all people to keep and bear arms. Not only shall this Right not be infringed, absolutely no laws; Federal, State or Local can alter this Right.
Would all here be okay with this alteration? As long as it was done legally? The exact way spelled out in the Constitution?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This is the current 2A. What is it were to be altered to say something like this...
The Right of all people to keep and bear arms. Not only shall this Right not be infringed, absolutely no laws; Federal, State or Local can alter this Right.
Would all here be okay with this alteration? As long as it was done legally? The exact way spelled out in the Constitution?
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
Those aren’t amendments.
He’s not wrong no amendment has no restrictions on them at all. It’s a balancing act and he’s going way beyond balance. He’s so far beyond balance it’s crazy.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
I didnt catch that. Im sure millions of Americans didnt either.
Most do not catch things. I like to repeat as often as possible... Words have meaning.
Granted, this asshole is definitely playing the words. He and his ilk have big plans.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
Well, the process lets you change what the amendments are.
It doesn't mean the existing amendments can be ignored.
When they outlawed Alcohol they amended the constitution to do it, because they acknowledged that it didn't grant them the power to do so otherwise.
When they started the "War on drugs" they decided it was easier to just ignore the constitution and outlaw them anyway.
See the difference ?
The fact that the amendments can be changed via a specific process doesn't mean you can just re-interpret them however you feel like outside that process by declaring they "aren't absolute".
The right (if they ever regain power) needs to abuse the absolute shit out of these precedents. They need to scare the hell out of the left until *they* are begging for the constitution to be followed again.
"Ok, we're going to double the size of SCOTUS, and boy are the new guys going to shake some stuff up".
"Well, we're going to outlaw the democrat party. I realize the constitution prohibits this, but none of it is absolute, right ?"
Him and Herman Cain was who I was hoping for , and I'm white!
Bob
6.5 Creedmoor
Our federal government is among the biggest slave masters in the world.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
The Bill of Rights (Amendments 1 - 10)
Preamble to the Bill of Rights *Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine. THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a...
nccs.net
So now we are trying to parse out just what that babbling foos means when he say, ANYTHING?
Robin
Arjuna
.338 Win Mag
