holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Ive told you already t hat nobody has any argument with that, you want to make an argument of something we already agree on what the fuck is wrong with you?
That's a nice opinion but there is no expiration date on it and some of the people here still serve.
Easy there big guy. There is no such thing as "hand out" help at the VA. Health care came with the oath, Veterans are entitled to it because they earned it! And most of us Vets will work hard to keep it! Granted at times it is not always the best care, and most of us Vets will work hard to change that.
If you want to insult someone, I ask you, please don't insinuate that they are a VETERAN.
If I mis-read or mis-interpreted what you posted, I apologize in advance.
Who cares what Andy thinks or wants to do? If he doesn't let it go and does 7 more trials, we could not let it go as well and one juror can vote, "Not Guilty" in the other 7 trials . Will it happen? No. Why? because there are beaten dogs like yourself in the jury box.@Willjr75 do you really think Andy will let this go? Not a chance!
This guys only hope is if and when the Un-Safe goes to the SCOTUS!
I've challenged you 3 times already. Don't act like you don't click on the tab that says, "Show Ignored Content" and read my posts. Show me that you are the tough guy that you say you are.In your dreams tough guy. Oh wait, you mean going 30 in a 25 zone ?
BTW somebody did brag about it ...... guess who ?
In your dreams tough guy. Oh wait, you mean going 30 in a 25 zone ?
BTW somebody did brag about it ...... guess who ?
Never meant it was not earned but rather that he gets better service at the VA's in NY then his home state. Yet still bad mouths NY.
Are you disrespecting Veterans that go to the VA hospital in the Bronx?Ok, think I see the point you are trying to make. Don't know if "he" comes to NY for VA services. Did you know that there are two zoo's in the Bronx? The one with animals and the one for Veterans.
I agree, I haven't posted in this shitfest until now, and it'll be my only one.This has got to be one of the most ridicoulous threads I have ever been part of. Some of the most stupidest remarks have been typed here in the past week or so. All this because one fool openly broke the law and was caught.
New York Gun laws are stupid and un-Constitutional, we all understand that. Hell, nearly every gun law in the entire US does not fall within the parameters of our Founding Documents.
Fools on here talking about "I live in a free state', really, your States have Zero gun laws? Stop, pure Bullshit. Some may live in Freer States, but no one in America is Free from the overreach of the Government.
The bragging of what one member has over the other is a childish joke as well. I have a horse, I am going big Horn hunting.... Wow, I am so impressed.
Members posting laws and Court cases as if they are to be understood.
Calling others names because they have disdain for the laws, telling them they are cowards because they don't openly break the law, what the fuck is wrong with some of you. Cowards? Pretty strong words from some.
Who cares what Andy thinks or wants to do? If he doesn't let it go and does 7 more trials, we could not let it go as well and one juror can vote, "Not Guilty" in the other 7 trials . Will it happen? No. Why? because there are beaten dogs like yourself in the jury box.
I mean no offense to you specifically but don't tell us to lay down, expose our bellies and vote "Guilty" because it's the law. Fuck that! What's the matter with you? Is that what you want or are you just talking to try to win an argument?
First off lets stop with the name calling it really takes away from the the conversation! Leave that to the (Ignored Member)
Folks here keep saying that this is Unconstitutional! Really has the SCOTUS said that yet?
This is an example to be brought up when I do a County Pistol class! That this is what can and will happen to someone caught in this situation possessing a magazine that can hold more the 10 rds.
So I'm sure no one here would advise for someone to go out with mags that hold more then 10 rds ! Don't worry you have jury-nullification on your side! I don't think those odds are very good!
I'm not trying to win an argument just dealing with the here and now, not the what could be!
Who's name calling? I said, " Beaten like dogs". That's not name calling.First off lets stop with the name calling it really takes away from the the conversation! Leave that to the (Ignored Member)
Folks here keep saying that this is Unconstitutional! Really has the SCOTUS said that yet?
This is an example to be brought up when I do a County Pistol class! That this is what can and will happen to someone caught in this situation possessing a magazine that can hold more the 10 rds.
So I'm sure no one here would advise for someone to go out with mags that hold more then 10 rds ! Don't worry you have jury-nullification on your side! I don't think those odds are very good!
I'm not trying to win an argument just dealing with the here and now, not the what could be!
So a law cannot be unconstitutional until SCOTUS rules on it? If Cuomo passes a law that all guns are banned in NY even hunting rifles and police sidearms, it isn't unconstitutional until SCOTUS decides to rule on it?You are correct sir, until the Court rules, the Constituionality of it stands stagnant.
So a law cannot be unconstitutional until SCOTUS rules on it? If Cuomo passes a law that all guns are banned in NY even hunting rifles and police sidearms, it isn't unconstitutional until SCOTUS decides to rule on it?
I mean as I'm seeing it, it is unconstitutional and SCOTUS reaffirms it if they feel like it.
This is beyond funny. Endless posts trying to find some justification to break settled law. Entertaining to talk about but nothing will come of it.
It's like a bunch of old women talking about whose late husband was a better lay. Entertaining but going nowhere.
View attachment 14826
I disagree. If they pass laws banning blacks from the front of buses, are you saying the law is the law and it's Constitutional until SCOTUS decides to hear it?Correct Will, until the High Court rules, the laws all stand. This is our way of law. There are exceptions, The House and Senate can pass a law to negate a State law and until the Courts rule on that passed law, all stays the way it is.
I see things pretty black and white, if it falls outside of the Founding Documents, it is not Contitutional, but who the hell am I to decide?!
I disagree. If they pass laws banning blacks from the front of buses, are you saying the law is the law and it's Constitutional until SCOTUS decides to hear it?
Pretty much the same reason this post was started. It's a constitutional thing called the right to free speech.
@Willjr75 do you really think Andy will let this go? Not a chance!
This guys only hope is if and when the Un-Safe goes to the SCOTUS!
I heard steyraug or whatever she calls herself is doing all this posting from under FUAC's desk. Sure does seem like a fan .
Might be rumor or innuendo, who knows though.