Dr. Evil
20×102mm Vulcan
Another result of the fear mongering and paranoia. Thank you media.
Last edited:
I’m trying to figure out your angle. What is it? Just expose those who aren’t healthy enough? What does being healthy or not have to do with trying to prevent infections so that the healthy don’t get it and pass it on to the non healthy? I got news for you. Your pizza guy isn’t healthy. Your mechanic isn’t as well. Neither is your mailman or your wife’s sister’s cousin’s husband. You keep preaching that the healthy have nothing to worry about. What about the non healthy? Do they matter?I am sorry for the loss of your coworkers. Nobody would say that's a good thing. My point is how you and many people define health. I am not talking about those with obvious illness and disease. I am talking about what constitutes as health in this country. People think you are healthy if you are fit. People think you are healthy if you don't have aches and pains. People think health comes in a synthetic drug or shot. People think that when they have symptoms they are sick and when they don't they are well. People think that when they have symptoms and take the drug that gets rid of the symptoms they are well. It is hard to blame anyone for this paradigm because this is how most are raised. It's how I was raised. It is also the reason why we are so unhealthy and sick as a nation.
My mother in law, who I mentioned previously, showed nothing on the outside for most of her life. She looked good, felt good and acted good. Anyone who would have seen her would have thought she was in good health because after all, we base "health" on what I mentioned above. Most wouldn't know she was on high blood pressure meds even though she didn't fit the typical profile of a smoker, being overweight, etc.. She died 9 years ago at 69 due to a tumor the doctors didn't even address for 25 years that was causing her high blood pressure. Almost right up to the end you probably would have thought she was doing great if you had met her again, because of what I mentioned above.
I'll mention Florence Joyner again. Most were STUNNED when she died in her late 30's. "But she was so healthy" they exclaimed. Why? Well, they were basing it again on what I mentioned above. As a matter of fact, do you see sickness here? Would you have though she was "healthy?" I'm sure you would have. View attachment 68494
It always makes me shake my head when someone passes from an illness that doesn't lend outward notification to others and people still claim, "I can't believe they died. They were so healthy." Um, no, if they were they would still be here.
Years ago there was a frat house that had a party with a lot of grain alcohol. 4 college students died from alcohol poisoning but 5 actually were poisoned. The one guy who didn't die threw up before he passed out, the others didn't. So the guy who threw up had a healthy function that saved his life and the others didn't. People think throwing up means you're sick. No, it means your body function is doing what it should do by getting rid of toxins. We have a very warped idea of health.
Please don't conflate my words with not thinking loss of life during this situation is real and sad. It is. I am just saying just because you or anyone else says this person or that person was healthy and they died doesn't make it so.
My angle? I guess I always look at cause vs. effect. You can't ultimately avoid infections unless you are the boy that lives in a plastic bubble. You can though prevent the damage done by them. I guess that's my angle. Of course the non healthy matter. I just wish more people would do things to become healthy instead of things that lead to them being non-healthy and have to treat disease. Why don't you point your questions to the profession that has gotten most people where they are? Maybe they have some answers lol.I’m trying to figure out your angle. What is it? Just expose those who aren’t healthy enough? What does being healthy or not have to do with trying to prevent infections so that the healthy don’t get it and pass it on to the non healthy? I got news for you. Your pizza guy isn’t healthy. Your mechanic isn’t as well. Neither is your mailman or your wife’s sister’s cousin’s husband. You keep preaching that the healthy have nothing to worry about. What about the non healthy? Do they matter?
Unfortunately I would say more than half this population is unhealthy as you would put it. Some by bad habits and some by genetics. Your disdain if that’s the right word (maybe not) or your wish for the unhealthy to be healthy isn’t going to change. Some cannot change due to genetics and some have no willpower or are too far gone. Welcome to America.I just wish more people would do things to become healthy instead of things that lead to them being non-healthy.
opinions, opinions, opinions.
Genetics doesn't mean destined. You can turn them on and off based on lifestyle. Epigenetics is a field that is showing this. Genes are like bullets in a gun and lifestyle is what pulls the trigger. Disdain? No disdain at all. Frustration that many like you have the attitude you do. The pizza guy isn't healthy, the mechanic isn't healthy. They have no willpower. Get used to it. Yes, welcome to America. I was a sick kid growing up. My epiglotis swelled shut, cut off my airway and I almost died. I had terrible allergies and got shots. I had stomach issues and had many colonoscopies early on. I wasn't happy with the answers I was getting so I looked, learned and applied. I am healthier now than I was when I was younger because I decided to look outside of the box so to speak. Couldn't help yourself with the old vaccine issue huh. You think that health is basically out of your hands and the responsibility of others. I find that pretty fucked up to coin a phrase. You have no clue what I do and your examples and analogies are pretty fruitless. You say tomato, I say tomato. Let's just call the whole thing off. It is you Will, isn't it? Why the name change?Unfortunately I would say more than half this population is unhealthy as you would put it. Some by bad habits and some by genetics. Your disdain if that’s the right word (maybe not) or your wish for the unhealthy to be healthy isn’t going to change. Some cannot change due to genetics and some have no willpower or are too far gone. Welcome to America.
You always preach no vaccines and live of the fruits of those that are vaccinated and because of them your family doesn’t get sick. Now you want to disregard all those unhealthy people that kept your loved ones from getting polio, measles, smallpox, ect and motherfuck them because you want to sit in a movie theater to watch iron man while eating celery sticks.
I find that pretty fucked up.
Regarding genetics, I personally know a family that suffers from all kinds of genetic deficiencies. Riley Day Syndrome, diabetes, all sorts of shit. As a person of Jewish ancestry, you should know that many people suffer from these diseases and no amount of exercise, diet, and meditation will make it go away once they manifest themselves. And to think the same to prevent manifestation is just false. To write these people off or say that it can all go away with a lifestyle change is wrong.Genetics doesn't mean destined. You can turn them on and off based on lifestyle. Epigenetics is a field that is showing this. Genes are like bullets in a gun and lifestyle is what pulls the trigger. Disdain? No disdain at all. Frustration that many like you have the attitude you do. The pizza guy isn't healthy, the mechanic isn't healthy. They have no willpower. Get used to it. Couldn't help yourself with the old vaccine issue huh. You think that health is basically out of your hands and the responsibility of others. I find that pretty fucked up to coin a phrase. You have no clue what I do and your examples and analogies are pretty fruitless. You say tomato, I say tomato. Let's just call the whole thing off. It is you Will, isn't it? Why the name change?
I'm saying for the average person with lifestyle diseases they can change things if they want to. I also never said that there wasn't a limitation of matter genetics or not where too much damage is done to reverse things. Only roughly 5-10% of cancers are genetic. Again though, even if genetic that doesn't mean it is out of your hands. Sure there are some diseases where there is a limitation of matter where too much damage is done. There are also many who abuse themselves too long to also have the time to change things. If you are driving 100 mph and see a sign that the bridge is washed out 10 miles ahead you have time to stop. Travel 100 mph and see a sign that the bridge is washed out 50 feet ahead and you are going over. You can't blame the brakes though. They did their job. You just applied them too late. More so than not people have the ability to change the course of their health. Some choose though not to or choose to just settle with their situation. I can't tell you how many people I have worked with that were told they would just have to learn to live with it and then find that wasn't necessarily true. That is both sad a frustrating. You don't like my answers. You don't agree with my thought process. Understood.Regarding genetics, I personally know a family that suffers from all kinds of genetic deficiencies. Riley Day Syndrome, diabetes, all sorts of shit. As a person of Jewish ancestry, you should know that many people suffer from these diseases and no amount of exercise, diet, and meditation will make it go away once they manifest themselves. And to think the same to prevent manifestation is just false. To write these people off or say that it can all go away with a lifestyle change is wrong.
I mentioned the vaccinations because it’s true. Not a jab at you to get you but the truth. Give back to those that have given is always the right way to go.
My name change was due to a number of reasons. It was pointed out to me that a google search of it pulled up all kinds of things. Gun forums, dating websites when I did that back in the day, ect. So I changed it and my email.
When you say 200,000 people in the US are going to die before this is over. That is a prediction, and that asshat was wrong, so wrong, it was like they came up with that number to cause this mass hysteria.
"""if someone dies with the COVID-19 we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.""
That Sir, is not an opinion , It is a stated fact by the white house Response Coordinator for the White House Coronavirus Task Force
If you believe your going to get accurate numbers by skewing information the way they want . Have at it . They are cooking the books by admission the numbers are obviously going to be higher . I don't see how anyone can deny that. And I don't see how that is useful in recording raw data. Can you tell me the benefits of doing it?
No the doctors are not stupid, but they have to follow hospital policy mandated by the government . The doctor really has no say in it. If these are the guidelines set down he has to obey them , or possibly lose his job .
Video above:
MN Sen & Dr.
@drscottjensen
Either you keep posting the same thing over and over or you don’t read other people’s posts. This particular video has been posted numerous times.If you believe your going to get accurate numbers by skewing information the way they want . Have at it . They are cooking the books by admission the numbers are obviously going to be higher . I don't see how anyone can deny that. And I don't see how that is useful in recording raw data. Can you tell me the benefits of doing it?
No the doctors are not stupid, but they have to follow hospital policy mandated by the government . The doctor really has no say in it. If these are the guidelines set down he has to obey them , or possibly lose his job .
Video above:
MN Sen & Dr.
@drscottjensen
Nobody is cooking any books. This is not money loundry or a movie. Doctors have to sign the death certificate that it is processed with all other papers and making false reports is unethical and illegal. There are several data collection methods and the best ones are not from goverment and not in the US in the first place.If you believe your going to get accurate numbers by skewing information the way they want . Have at it . They are cooking the books by admission the numbers are obviously going to be higher . I don't see how anyone can deny that. And I don't see how that is useful in recording raw data. Can you tell me the benefits of doing it?
No the doctors are not stupid, but they have to follow hospital policy mandated by the government . The doctor really has no say in it. If these are the guidelines set down he has to obey them , or possibly lose his job .
Video above:
MN Sen & Dr.
@drscottjensen
Extrange there is no mention about helping doctors and nurses and each other fight this. Forget about politics. Fuck that right now.
Either you keep posting the same thing over and over or you don’t read other people’s posts. This particular video has been posted numerous times.
You are beating a dead horse. Yes number are being skewed. But make no mistake, people are dying from this. And it isn’t just the frail and weak like some of you kooks are alluding to.
Nobody is cooking any books.
A press statement is not a fact, 2 complete different things.Your in denial of the facts . They came right out and said it. You explain to me how doing that is beneficial to the data records?
What evidence do you want me to provide? If I recall correctly, it is you providing information from blogs. Like I said, get in your car and drive down here. Go to a hospital in Brooklyn. Prove us all wrong. Show us how bad this hoax really is.#1 You may not be the only person reading the thread.
#2 nobody ever said people are not dying, I dont know why you insist on putting words in my mouth or making false accusations.
#3 provide evidence of your claims.
Coronavirus patients over age 80 have a death rate of 15%. Here's the death rate for every age bracket.
Patients in their 50s had a death rate that was three times higher than the death rate for patients in their 40s.
Coronavirus patients over age 80 have a death rate of 15%. Here's the death rate for every age bracket.
Coronavirus patients in their 50s are about three times more likely to die than patients in their 40s.www.businessinsider.com
Coronavirus Deaths Are So Far Mostly Older Men, Many With Previous Health Issues
Coronavirus Deaths Are So Far Mostly Older Men, Many With Previous Health Issues (Published 2020)
As China released details about the first 17 people who have died in the outbreak, a well-known SARS expert raised an alarm about the virus’s spread, saying he felt “powerless.”www.nytimes.com
What are the risks for people like me?
The elderly and the unwell are more likely to die, if they contract coronavirus.
Current estimates from Imperial College London are that the death rate is almost 10 times higher than average for those over 80, and much lower for those under 40.
The UK government's chief medical advisor, Professor Chris Whitty, says even though the rates are higher for older people, "the great majority of older people will have a mild or moderate disease".
He also warns that we should not think it's a trivial infection for younger people, pointing out that there are some young people who have ended up in intensive care.
It's not just age that determines the risk of infections.
In the first big analysis of more than 44,000 cases from China, deaths were at least five times more common among confirmed cases with diabetes, high blood pressure or heart or breathing problems.
All of these factors interact with each other and we don't yet have a complete picture of the risk for every type of person in every location.
And even though patterns in the death rates among confirmed cases can tell us who is most at risk, they can't tell us about the precise risk in any single group.
Coronavirus death rate: What are the chances of dying?
The current best guess of a 1% death rate does not apply to everyone.www.bbc.com
Researchers on Monday announced the most comprehensive estimates to date of elderly people’s elevated risk of serious illness and death from the new coronavirus: Covid-19 kills an estimated 13.4% of patients 80 and older, compared to 1.25% of those in their 50s and 0.3% of those in their 40s.
The sharpest divide came at age 70. Although 4% of patients in their 60s died, more than twice that, or 8.6%, of those in their 70s did, Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London and his colleagues estimated in their paper, published in Lancet Infectious Diseases.
What explains Covid-19's lethality for the elderly? - STAT
Please stop making false accusations .
I have no doubt that some hospitals in the hot zones are very busy. The people working there are no doubt working their asses off, and we all owe them a debt.What evidence do you want me to provide? If I recall correctly, it is you providing information from blogs. Like I said, get in your car and drive down here. Go to a hospital in Brooklyn. Prove us all wrong. Show us how bad this hoax really is.
A press statement is not a fact, 2 complete different things.
The US government doesn't own the data. The US is not the only country with data about this virus.
We go with what the doctors, hospitals and universities data not what the government reports.
The government and all politicians have been wrong about this virus from the beginning.
Because of their failures people don't have much trust on anything they say.
What evidence do you want me to provide? If I recall correctly, it is you providing information from blogs. Like I said, get in your car and drive down here. Go to a hospital in Brooklyn. Prove us all wrong. Show us how bad this hoax really is.
WATCH: Police Raid Church's Drive-In Service, Issue $500 Tickets to Entire Congregation - Todd Starnes
Police in Greenville, Mississippi raided the parking lot of Temple Baptist Church during a drive-in prayer service and issued $500 […]www.toddstarnes.com
Church leaders decided to rig up a radio frequency where congregants could sit in their cars and listen as the pastor delivered the message from the pulpit. In other words, the church was in compliance with social distancing rules.
You want proof? You want me to go to hospitals and steal medical records? If I had access to my coworkers medical records that died, would that be proof to you? Not all of them were frail and weak. All those nurses, doctors, ect are all the frail and weak too.You stated that it wasn't just the frail and weak that are dying from this.
I gave you several references (not blogs) to dispute what you have said .
Im asking you to post the references that back up your claim that its affecting everyone equally .
If I make a statement that I think someone might question, I post a reference or two to a reliable source so people know I didn't just make it up or misinterpret it . So even if they disagree at least they know Im not talking out of my ass.
You are going to have to show Holdover proof.I know a few people 50 and under who have died. My mother has implored me over and over not to be cocky because she's had some patients in perfect health around my age who've died.