yes they will.They won't have the senate after that.
yes they will.They won't have the senate after that.
The way I read it, it will be a crime to buy it or to wear armor while you are committing a crime. Wearing body armor if you already own it, or buy it out of state isn't illegal yet.View attachment 164557
So does mean, now that they're banning hard plate armor, the effective date is in the past? Or does "in the same manner" mean, similar to the passage of chapter 210, that there is a thirteen day window from passing (or amending, in this case)?
I'm not sure how they're going to retroactively make people felons here.
The way I read it, it will be a crime to buy it or to wear armor while you are committing a crime. Wearing body armor if you already own it, or buy it out of state isn't illegal yet.
None of it is supposed to. Much of this law will eventually be overturned, either piecemeal or all at once. Does not matter. The process is the punishment.None of this garbage makes any sense.
only if it is free.Training requirement will survive.
I thought this was already shot down with Heller or the other one.Safe Storage laws will survive
When was it ever illegal? It was just recommended that you don’t in my county. It was never forbidden.Ironically, it’s now going to be legal as per state law to leave your gun in your car-lol
It wasn’t actually banned. Only the sale in NY was banned. You can still own it.I'll have to read more, I don't remember hard armor being banned. I thought it was just soft armor, the kind the guy at Tops wasn't wearing.
It’s illegal in a lot of local laws. But I see the proposed state law allows locals to ban itWhen was it ever illegal? It was just recommended that you don’t in my county. It was never forbidden.
Still own it and buy hard plates.It wasn’t actually banned. Only the sale in NY was banned. You can still own it.
Still own it and buy hard plates.
Dems will not have 60 votes in the U.S. Senate in the next session ... it's impossible, and will most likely fall short of their current 50.yes they will.
I vaguely remember this happening to a NJ security guard. Similar in nature, as he was carrying hollow points, ISSUED to him by his employer. Hollow points are illegal in NJ. Got pulled over, displayed his SG card and firearm, was arrested and prosecuted for it. Don't know the outcome.Depending on the wording , it might be illegal to go to the licensing office to turn in your guns. It’s a government building.
It’s illegal for a security guard on his way to work to use mass transit ?
The outcome was all charges dropped. He had critical defense ammo which NJ says arent hollowpoints.I vaguely remember this happening to a NJ security guard. Similar in nature, as he was carrying hollow points, ISSUED to him by his employer. Hollow points are illegal in NJ. Got pulled over, displayed his SG card and firearm, was arrested and prosecuted for it. Don't know the outcome.
Cripes... for those that store your guns in a wooden gun case or metal stack-on cabinets: AND SHALL BE FIRE, IMPACT, AND TAMPER RESISTANT
Basically that means you need to buy an actual gun safe.
Also, I was reading that Senate Bill S51001 the training requirements seem rather rigorous... what is concerning is that I know of people that shoot only a couple times a year, and don't keep a lot of ammo on hand. A few friends relied on me to reload .380 for example for them because it was like non-existent for a while at least in my neck of the woods. What happens if you don't have the money or the resources to do the mandatory training? 2 hours shooting, I can see going through 200-300 rounds easy. On top of this, there aren't enough instructors as it is. Some folks are also shitty at taking exams as they get older.
19. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OR RENEWAL OF A LICENSE UNDER PARAGRAPH (F)
OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, ISSUED OR RENEWED ON OR AFTER THE
EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SUBDIVISION, AN APPLICANT SHALL COMPLETE AN
IN-PERSON LIVE FIREARMS SAFETY COURSE CONDUCTED BY A DULY AUTHORIZED
INSTRUCTOR WITH CURRICULUM APPROVED BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
SERVICES AND THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE POLICE, AND MEETING THE FOLLOW-
ING REQUIREMENTS: (A) A MINIMUM OF SIXTEEN HOURS OF IN-PERSON LIVE
CURRICULUM APPROVED BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES AND THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE POLICE, CONDUCTED BY A DULY AUTHORIZED INSTRUC-
TOR APPROVED BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES, AND SHALL
INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING TOPICS: (I) GENERAL FIREARM
SAFETY; (II) SAFE STORAGE REQUIREMENTS AND GENERAL SECURE STORAGE BEST
PRACTICES; (III) STATE AND FEDERAL GUN LAWS; (IV) SITUATIONAL AWARENESS;
(V) CONFLICT DE-ESCALATION; (VI) BEST PRACTICES WHEN ENCOUNTERING LAW
ENFORCEMENT; (VII) THE STATUTORILY DEFINED SENSITIVE PLACES IN SUBDIVI-
SION TWO OF SECTION 265.01-E OF THIS CHAPTER AND THE RESTRICTIONS ON
POSSESSION ON RESTRICTED PLACES UNDER SECTION 265.01-D OF THIS CHAPTER;
(VIII) CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; (IX) USE OF DEADLY FORCE; (X) SUICIDE
PREVENTION; AND (XI) THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF MARKSMANSHIP; AND (B) A
MINIMUM OF TWO HOURS OF A LIVE-FIRE RANGE TRAINING COURSE. THE APPLICANT
SHALL BE REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE PROFICIENCY BY SCORING A MINIMUM OF
EIGHTY PERCENT CORRECT ANSWERS ON A WRITTEN TEST FOR THE CURRICULUM
UNDER PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS SUBDIVISION AND THE PROFICIENCY LEVEL DETER-
MINED BY THE RULES AND REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMI-
NAL JUSTICE SERVICES AND THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE POLICE FOR THE
LIVE-FIRE RANGE TRAINING UNDER PARAGRAPH (B) OF THIS SUBDIVISION. UPON
DEMONSTRATION OF SUCH PROFICIENCY, A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION SHALL BE
ISSUED TO SUCH APPLICANT IN THE APPLICANT'S NAME AND ENDORSED AND
AFFIRMED UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY BY SUCH DULY AUTHORIZED INSTRUC-
TOR. AN APPLICANT REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE TRAINING REQUIRED HEREIN
PRIOR TO RENEWAL OF A LICENSE ISSUED PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS
SUBDIVISION SHALL ONLY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE SUCH TRAINING FOR THE
FIRST RENEWAL OF SUCH LICENSE AFTER SUCH EFFECTIVE DATE.
What passes for a "journalist" in 2022, so basically yea, elementary school.Who the fuck wrote that article? A 5th grader?
My .02. Having the 4 cases remanded back to the lower courts is actually not great for us in NY. Had SCOTUS issued a writ to hear those cases, it would be a national ruling, potentially helping all of us. Instead, having the determinations vacated and sent back down will only effect the original states, hence no bueno helping in NY.With the SCOTUS returning 4 2A cases back down to lower courts Thursday, the message is clear! When and if NY enacts an unconstitutional law, it will be struck down! The 2 step process that Justice Thomas noted in his decision is what will not be tolerated. The high capacity ban is in jeopardy too, and more!
But NY will drag it's citizens, it's law abiding citizens through the mud, just to make a point. All the while gangbangers and 100x losers are let go on the streets! It's all a fucking joke! Maybe if it were 100 years ago instead of everyone bullshiting on their cell phones things would be different... Just an observation!
FUNY!
That's what it states. The scary part is if you fail the test because you are a shitty exam taker. Now the .gov will tell you that you need to give up your guns.So this only applies to the renewal once? Either way this is insane. It's like the ammo database, it'll probably take years if at all to be implemented.
Or but it next door and bring it back.It wasn’t actually banned. Only the sale in NY was banned. You can still own it.
What I read is there is a "while hunting" exception for both sensitive places and restricted places (private property). So if you are afield with your gun (and back tag outside north country due to that stupid reg) in pursuit of game you should fall under the exception to those charges,There is a while hunting except, but that’s for state land and not private land. So my question is if your neighbors land is posted and he verbally gives you the ok is that enough now or would you still be a felon per the states rules. If he posts his land with OK TO HUNT then does that apply to everyone or just who he gives permission to. I hunt on land that isn’t mine, a guys land I have semi-regular contact with and a guys land who just doesn’t post it at all and no one has met him in the last 25 years that we know of. On my parents land there is a road where one guy owns half and another guy owns the other half. I have permission to hunt one guys property but not the other. Am I a felon if I step one step off the middle or hunt the guys land I have default permission to hunt since he doesn’t post it?
There's already a federal law making it illegal to sell ammo for pistols <21 years of age. At some big box stores I've been asked for pistol permit buying .22LR or 9mm. I just tell them it's for carbine and they sell it to me without that. This should be the same.Yes I’m aware of that, but many cartridges overlap bolt action or semi automatic so do you think stores will take your word that your .223 is a bolt action rifle and not semi auto? This is where it will be confusing and difficult to navigate.
Correct. They will only effect the 3rd, 4th, and 9th circuits directly, but can be used as precedent for lawsuits in other circuits.My .02. Having the 4 cases remanded back to the lower courts is actually not great for us in NY. Had SCOTUS issued a writ to hear those cases, it would be a national ruling, potentially helping all of us. Instead, having the determinations vacated and sent back down will only effect the original states, hence no bueno helping in NY.
So if one hunts on property without permission instead of just a trespass charge you become a felon. ? I know several landowners that in a large tract of woods really don't know where their boundary exactly is. Very easy to stray onto another property without knowing you did. .. Just wonderingThere is a while hunting except, but that’s for state land and not private land. So my question is if your neighbors land is posted and he verbally gives you the ok is that enough now or would you still be a felon per the states rules. If he posts his land with OK TO HUNT then does that apply to everyone or just who he gives permission to. I hunt on land that isn’t mine, a guys land I have semi-regular contact with and a guys land who just doesn’t post it at all and no one has met him in the last 25 years that we know of. On my parents land there is a road where one guy owns half and another guy owns the other half. I have permission to hunt one guys property but not the other. Am I a felon if I step one step off the middle or hunt the guys land I have default permission to hunt since he doesn’t post it?
Can anyone explain the recertification requirements? Also from what I read, all firearm transfers and ammo transfers/purchases and NICS background checks will go through a new division of the NYSP? Does that mean no more amendments when purchasing a firearm?Hochul's gun control bill passed the Assembly & Senate.
NY State Assembly Bill A41001
NY State Senate Bill S