If your take was correct, and none of know if it is, then you would have a case of selective enforcement, an actual effective legal defense.As written, open carry is illegal for security and us because we do not have an exemption for it. It’s a poorly written law with unintended illegality just the same as when they forgot to exempt cops when the safe act was passed. The only difference is that they didn’t amend it for us to fix it like they did with the police. It just isn’t enforced for security just the same as it isn’t enforced for us when hunting, at the range, or on private property.
I do not feel like getting into a pissing match here but anyone with a good grasp of reading comprehension can see that all carry and possession is illegal via penal law 265 unless exempted via penal law 400. The exemptions listed in penal law 400 is possession only if you get premise license and to have and carry concealed if you get license F. There is no exemption for any other method of carry besides concealed.
That’s the debate. To have and to carry concealed. If I own a pen and it is held on top of my ear or clipped to my shirt I have the pen. Everyone looking at me would say “he has a pen”. If I put the pen inside my pocket I am carrying the pen concealed. To have AND to carry concealed. An additional permission as I understand it.
Concealed carry was what was to be regulated when the law was enacted. Up until then it was the criminals who would conceal so they could surprise their victims. This law granted ordinary citizens the ability to conceal. I understand you don’t have the same opinion and yours is no more valid than mine. I wish the AG or someone would just give us an answer in this.