holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Eddie , chill man. why the hostility?
Polymer80 raided yesterday (12/10/20) by JBT
- Thread starter fnfalguy
- Start date
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Calling people snow flakes and putting words in their mouths . whats the Issue ? Trump banned bump stocks?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
As per GOP above bumpstocks aren't protected so they can be banned..
Well then based on that folding stocks aren't protected and therefore the safe act is ok.
Yes trump did
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
No,no. Thats not what he was saying. Your premises is correct. neither are considered firearms under the law , ergo they dont infringe on 2nd A rights
No snowflake here, it is just the garbage that you spew here is taxing to say the least, easier to not look at the spewed garbage.
You cannot even have a civil conversation. You have serious issues with reading comprehension, this is why I usually choose not to read your dribble.
You are correct, I missread that, that is my bad
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
OK so what? it never infringed on the 2nd A.
Still a snowflake for the ignore button 
How didnt it??
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
How old are you?
Keep reading buttercup
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Its really simple. Its not a firearm. its not protected under the law ,thought that obvious enough.
No problem
Cleck
.308 Win
You fuckers should get a room, jesus 
What about the rest of this that I read, "...failing to pay taxes, shipping guns across state lines and failing to conduct background investigations."
Is none of that a legit reason to raid them for doing, like what happened w/ Jackson or another gun shop doing something similar? Or is this just all based on the fact they were packaging this whole kit together, which even if just parts in a box, apparently is now a whole firearm?
What about the rest of this that I read, "...failing to pay taxes, shipping guns across state lines and failing to conduct background investigations."
Is none of that a legit reason to raid them for doing, like what happened w/ Jackson or another gun shop doing something similar? Or is this just all based on the fact they were packaging this whole kit together, which even if just parts in a box, apparently is now a whole firearm?
drowhawk
.44 mag
"Shall not be infringed." Why is it that you would take the ATF's classification for what is a protected or non-protected item as gospel? Banning bump stocks was not about whether or not I wanted a bump stock. It's whether or not I had the RIGHT (which I do).
With your logic, an outright ban on solar reflectors for vehicle windshields would be legal, as it wouldn't ban the ownership of a vehicle itself. And as friggin stupid and pointless solar reflectors are for vehicles, I would never tell someone they shouldn't be able to use one.
The same is true for bump stocks. Whatever helps you sleep at night GOPerfect, that's fine with me. Just know that as a patriot; someone who TRULY supports liberty, I support the 2nd amendment to its fullest extent. Regardless of what you feel we should or shouldn't have, I still support your right to keep and bear arms.
With your logic, an outright ban on solar reflectors for vehicle windshields would be legal, as it wouldn't ban the ownership of a vehicle itself. And as friggin stupid and pointless solar reflectors are for vehicles, I would never tell someone they shouldn't be able to use one.
The same is true for bump stocks. Whatever helps you sleep at night GOPerfect, that's fine with me. Just know that as a patriot; someone who TRULY supports liberty, I support the 2nd amendment to its fullest extent. Regardless of what you feel we should or shouldn't have, I still support your right to keep and bear arms.
drowhawk
.44 mag
This is why I have a hard time getting behind law enforcement these days. A lot of you say you support the constitution and the 2nd amendment, right up until the point that you don't. The excuses I hear some of you making that justify supporting someone like Trump, are the same excuses I hear when LEO's are shutting down businesses by executive order, justifying it by saying, "well, I'm just following orders."
I have family in LE that I wouldn't trust to uphold the constitution for this reason. It's the mental gymnastics you have to perform to justify these infringements that scares me. It shows that there's no limit to the tyranny most of our boys in blue will go to bat for.
It's sad because I have a tremendous amount of respect for the job and the people that do it. I just don't trust them.
I have family in LE that I wouldn't trust to uphold the constitution for this reason. It's the mental gymnastics you have to perform to justify these infringements that scares me. It shows that there's no limit to the tyranny most of our boys in blue will go to bat for.
It's sad because I have a tremendous amount of respect for the job and the people that do it. I just don't trust them.
drowhawk
.44 mag
Neither is a trigger.
BAN.
Ooops don't forget the barrel, that's not technically a firearm either.
BAN.
And those pesky firing pins that make the bullets go boom.
BAN.
See how slippery of a slope this mentality is? Pretty soon the only "legal" firearm we can buy is a serialized lower. Owning any of the other parts that actually make it functional would be a felony.
Again, with the lack of reading comprehension, that apparently you are lacking, nowhere did I say I support the ban on this stock.
I asked a question and you creamed your pants in anticipation of saying something worth while, which you have not as of yet.
Sounds like some of the people in your family are lacking something. You should try and fix that.
Shit even figured this was cleared up by now.. since post 71
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
A firearm is defined by law. Clearly a bump stock is not a firearm under any stretch of the definition.
Yes I see where your going with this. and I generally agree with it. A bump stock is not a necessity for a firearm to function, therefore it is not an infringement like banning barrels or triggers.