Now your going to get pissed lol.
If it was me, 99.9 range gun at 100 to 200, I would be looking at a 3x prism scope.
Super durable, etched illuminated reticle with bdc, good glass with no distortion, perfect for the ranges you said.
This is the reason military uses acogs, which is a prism sight.
Was that primary arms the gen3 with Chevron reticle? I heard those are much better than the earlier ones. The good 1x6 scopes can be pricey.Hory shet this thread got weird.
I've had two holosuns. One mounted on an utlimak, another on an ar.
They are a little cheap feeling compared to my aimpoint. At the same time, they held up just fine and took the heat of an ak gas system like a champ.
That being said, I still have my aimpoint. The holosuns went with various rifles when they were sold... I would grab one again for a pcc or a cheap upper and expect it to hold up just fine. While I enjoy torture tests, I dont plan to drag mine behind a truck.
The sig, tru glo, holosun, palmetto, and primary arms are all made by the same oem. Just buy whatever one is cheapest the time with the features you want.
My personal over looked favorites are 1-3 and 2-7 scopes. I have several from Japanese and American companies. They give quick shots yet better long range ability. Especially when you're trying to make out a critter through brush and thread the eyes of a needle through branches.
A weaver v3 1-3x literally weighs nine ounces and had an 87 foot fov at 100 yards. They are $139 with free shipping at Natchez right now. Not the cool, hip thing since about 2012, but widely used in 3 gun before the new wonder 1-6 scopes came out. Made in Japan.
P.s. I had a primary arms 1-6 and hated it. Heavy, busy reticle, and fish tank like clarity. If you're going 1-6, buy once, cry once.
I'll agree about the tube holosuns feeling cheaply made, including the risers, but they hold up. The 510 on the other hand is very nice, and quite beefy. They are even using a titanium hood for protection.Hory shet this thread got weird.
I've had two holosuns. One mounted on an utlimak, another on an ar.
They are a little cheap feeling compared to my aimpoint. At the same time, they held up just fine and took the heat of an ak gas system like a champ.
That being said, I still have my aimpoint. The holosuns went with various rifles when they were sold... I would grab one again for a pcc or a cheap upper and expect it to hold up just fine. While I enjoy torture tests, I dont plan to drag mine behind a truck.
The sig, tru glo, holosun, palmetto, and primary arms are all made by the same oem. Just buy whatever one is cheapest the time with the features you want.
My personal over looked favorites are 1-3 and 2-7 scopes. I have several from Japanese and American companies. They give quick shots yet better long range ability. Especially when you're trying to make out a critter through brush and thread the eyes of a needle through branches.
A weaver v3 1-3x literally weighs nine ounces and had an 87 foot fov at 100 yards. They are $139 with free shipping at Natchez right now. Not the cool, hip thing since about 2012, but widely used in 3 gun before the new wonder 1-6 scopes came out. Made in Japan.
P.s. I had a primary arms 1-6 and hated it. Heavy, busy reticle, and fish tank like clarity. If you're going 1-6, buy once, cry once.
Vortex Strike Eagle, good scope and it's right in your budget range. Around $500 gets you into a lot of quality budget scopes.I hate you!!!!
Excellent point to consider.
Mostly 99.9% range time from 100-200 yds.
I'm leaning back to LPVO again. The problem with this choice is my budget is not putting me into anything near decent quality. That bothers me.
P.s. I had a primary arms 1-6 and hated it. Heavy, busy reticle, and fish tank like clarity. If you're going 1-6, buy once, cry once.
This is probably the most helpful thing said in the thread. If you are in my AO I would offer you the same with different choices of course.@masterswimmer if you aren't in a rush, and you are relatively close, and interested, I have a vortex lvpo and holosun red dot, vortex sparc and strike fire 2 you can look at/try out. Let me know. The vortex I have is the less expensive crossfire but should give you an idea of what the LVPO is like. As for the holosuns I have both a 510c and 503GU. And if you are curious could bring along an ACOG and trijicon reflex.
@masterswimmer if you aren't in a rush, and you are relatively close, and interested, I have a vortex lvpo and holosun red dot, vortex sparc and strike fire 2 you can look at/try out. Let me know. The vortex I have is the less expensive crossfire but should give you an idea of what the LVPO is like. As for the holosuns I have both a 510c and 503GU. And if you are curious could bring along an ACOG and trijicon reflex.
Thanks for that offer. You anywhere near Orange County?
Yep. Live in OC. Near Newburgh. If you have a range we can meet there. Not sure the schedule of my range this weekend but can check tonight.
Make sure to let us know what you settle on.I do have a range available. PM incoming.
Thanks!
Make sure to let us know what you settle on.
Downsides? If for defense, 0 to 50 will always be mostly what you’ll shoot at and you’ll handicap your rifle with a 2x7.Re 2x7 and 1x4- I have to do some swapping and testing but I've found (so far) that i actually like my Vortex 2x7 better than my Burris 1x4 for the 50-150 yard environment. Its lighter, smaller, and I fuss with the zoom a lot less.
I have to try it some more at shorter distances but may actually replace the 1x4 with another 2x7 (the Burris is on a .223 AR and the Vortex is on a .308 Mossberg Patrol so there are more variables than the scopes I need to play with). Anyone see downsides to going to the 2x7 instead of the 1x4?
ETA: this was sort of a hijack because the 2x7 has no illumination. Just throwing it out there.
I just ordered a Vortex 2-7 for my 7.62x39 AR. I had been using mostly 1-4 scopes, but 4x was leaving me wanting more.Re 2x7 and 1x4- I have to do some swapping and testing but I've found (so far) that i actually like my Vortex 2x7 better than my Burris 1x4 for the 50-150 yard environment. Its lighter, smaller, and I fuss with the zoom a lot less.
I have to try it some more at shorter distances but may actually replace the 1x4 with another 2x7 (the Burris is on a .223 AR and the Vortex is on a .308 Mossberg Patrol so there are more variables than the scopes I need to play with). Anyone see downsides to going to the 2x7 instead of the 1x4?
ETA: this was sort of a hijack because the 2x7 has no illumination. Just throwing it out there.
Actually it was @Edwardteach72 that first suggested a scope. Must've gotten lost in the two pages of back and forth bickering.
Anyways, the PST is quite an upgrade over what you were originally planning, happens to all of us. That scope should serve you very well, it is a popular and well liked optic, a notch or two above the Strike Eagles.
With even a 1-6 scope, hits that took some concentration with a red dot become boringly routine under 6x. There is a small steel target set out at the 200 yard line of the High Power line at my range. With a RDS I could hit it maybe 7 of ten times. With my scope I can hit it every single time with out trying very hard. Seriously, I loaded up a 30 round make and just had at it.
"Bang, ping, bang, ping, bang, ping"
Every single time, not one miss.
That's what I meant by @masterswimmer upgrading. Not a cheap scope. It's a good scope though. Ian of forgotten weapons bought one for his "what would Stoner do?" rifle and he likes it.Ouch.. msrp $899..
Ouch.. msrp $899..