SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Ghost Gun Rule - Garland v. Vanderstok

Light or Train

  • Light

    Votes: 10 50.0%

  • Train

    Votes: 8 40.0%

  • Other

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • Total voters
    20
dsdmmat

dsdmmat

Donut Master
Moderator
Messages
10,894
Reaction score
24,285
Location
Alpha Quadrant, Sector 001
Ehh, I can see SCotUS screwing the pooch on this one. They seem to be agreeing with the solicitor general that drilling a couple of holes is not the same as working on a car.

I would argue the 1968 gun control act is unconstitutional and the ghost gun ban is unconstitutional as well because it points to an unconstitutional law as the basis for being lawful. 2 wrongs don’t make a right, but three lefts do.

is it unconstitutional to run your own newspaper out of your house? All it takes is a computer and a printer.
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

.950 JDJ
Messages
33,135
Reaction score
37,278
Location
Western NY
dsdmmat said:
Ehh, I can see SCotUS screwing the pooch on this one. They seem to be agreeing with the solicitor general that drilling a couple of holes is not the same as working on a car.

I would argue the 1968 gun control act is unconstitutional and the ghost gun ban is unconstitutional as well because it points to an unconstitutional law as the basis for being lawful. 2 wrongs don’t make a right, but three lefts do.

is it unconstitutional to run your own newspaper out of your house? All it takes is a computer and a printer.
Click to expand...
Plenary of news sources are saying they will agree with The feds on this one
 
Catskillkid

Catskillkid

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
9,956
Reaction score
18,132
Location
Livin' in a Gangsta's Paradise (AKA New York)
From what I read it sounds like Thomas and Alito will vote pro 2A and all the other justices will vote the other way. Even if you can still create a "ghost gun" with materials you can buy in Home Depot and Lowes.

This court overturned Roe v Wade with the Dodd decision and that's all they really cared about. Frankly, we should be glad they gave us the Bruen decision, even though the aftermath of that made most of our lives demonstrably worse off (e.g. ammo background check).
 
Catskillkid

Catskillkid

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
9,956
Reaction score
18,132
Location
Livin' in a Gangsta's Paradise (AKA New York)
IrishMick said:
I do not like green Glocks and Ham! I do not like them Sam Alito man! Hahaha!
Click to expand...

I would not could not with a Glock
I would not could not with a sock

Of these "ghost guns" I'm not a fan
I will not like Sam Alito man!

Would you shoot them with a Colt?
Would you shoot them if I'm a dolt?

I would never use ghost guns Alito Man
I would push the government for a ban!

- Ghost Guns and Bans
 
Celt

Celt

.338 Win Mag
Messages
9,440
Reaction score
19,256
Location
Westchester
Text history and tradition. Ctizens have been making firearms from the beginning of this country, and even before that, so I don't see how they can rule any other way ( while conforming with the Bruen decision).
 
Z

Zerex

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
1,890
Location
Rome, NY
SCOTUS ruled on bump stocks............

The law is clear....................
FEELINGS ARE NOT.

The frame and receiver rule/reg is about ...........FEELINGS, not law.

Libs fear all guns and especially home made guns...............FEELINGS
They feel that criminals might get one..........the Law is clear...........FEEL THIS.......

The BOR was about FEAR............. not feelings.........................feelings.......... by Tories and King George and their descendants, who are today are communists/Royalists.......................... who have bad feelings about guns and the peasants who kill kings, and who protect their personal property from Kings and the slothful whores...........via the BOR..................ALL OF THEM.
 
Cavalry

Cavalry

.308 Win
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
7,762
Location
Behind Enemy Lines
If the SC rules favorably as they should, that otherwise non prohibited individuals are free to construct their own arms, without infrighment or permission needed, what will NY's response be? Hopefully the Court has learned their lesson from Bruen and would craft a decision that does not allow for shenanigans.
 
VietnamEraVet

VietnamEraVet

.308 Win
U.S. Military
Messages
4,035
Reaction score
8,362
Location
Ex WNY as of 08/2018. Screw FUAC & FUKH too!
I was very disappointed with the argument in court made by Vanderstok's attorney. We'll see where this goes, but at this point, I expect Robert's and Barrett, - and maybe even Gorsuch and Kavanaugh to join with the libtards against us. They are simply in fear of a well armed populace, and the homemade firearms absolutely scare the shit out of them.
 
Z

Zerex

6.5 Creedmoor
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
1,890
Location
Rome, NY
Weak worthless/poor arguments really do not matter...................an idiot does not change the facts, and only the law counts...were legal, and now they are not, because a lawless cretin said so?



Bump Stocks are an example.............................FEELINGS were defeated in that case, by the law.
I expect the same next June.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top