Supposedly the Supreme Court will over turn roe v wade

H

holdover

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
15,205
Reaction score
22,072
Location
occupied NY
SonOfSun said:
The decision was set to come out in June at the end of the SC session. That's still well before November elections. No need to leak if if that's your goal. Heck, waiting until it was closer would be better if that was their goal.

If the leak had a political purpose I think it would more to be influence the decision itself and not drum up votes.
Click to expand...
Yeah, because why would they want to do that?
 
nortatoga

nortatoga

.338 Win Mag
Monthly Donor
Messages
8,156
Reaction score
18,179
Location
Saratoga County
SonOfSun said:
It's not intimidation. It's protesting. If I don't like what you do as a government representative I can protest your actions in public places.

I'm also ok with the government representatives fearing the people. They've acted like royalty for far too long. They work for us, not the other way around.
Click to expand...

www.breitbart.com

Barr on SCOTUS Home Protests: 'Federal Crime' to Go to Judge's Residence to Influence Decisions

Former Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday on FNC's "Jesse Watters Primetime" that the protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices after a draft opinion leaked that would overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling were a violation of both federal and state law. | Clips
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
 
tirwin1

tirwin1

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
12,733
Reaction score
33,120
Location
rochester
Drinkthekoolaid said:
Too bad these "protestors" won't be treated with equivalency to Jan 6th protestors.

Let's see them all get intimidated by the limitless resources of the corrupt FBI, hunted down, rounded up, denied bail, sent to prison and or solitary confinement.
Click to expand...
This times 1,000. Clear evidence there are clear double standards when it comes to law enforcement.
 
SonOfSun

SonOfSun

.308 Win
Messages
4,015
Reaction score
4,726
Location
WNY
nortatoga said:
www.breitbart.com

Barr on SCOTUS Home Protests: 'Federal Crime' to Go to Judge's Residence to Influence Decisions

Former Attorney General Bill Barr said Monday on FNC's "Jesse Watters Primetime" that the protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices after a draft opinion leaked that would overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling were a violation of both federal and state law. | Clips
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
Click to expand...

Barr said, “Well, that’s not a valid form of protest because it’s a violation of the law. There is time and place for protests,

Sounds like shit a fascist would say.... "There's a time and place for protests".... as in you can protest when nobody else is around. Fuck him.


and the federal statute makes it clear if you go to the house of a judge, the residence of a judge to influence the judge in his decisions and demonstrate that that’s a federal crime

Sounds like a bullshit law and unconstitutional at that. The whole point of every protest is to influence government actions. More fascist shit from Barr. Yeah you can protest, just not the people making decision because it might influence them. Get the F outta here with that nonsense.
 
H

holdover

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
15,205
Reaction score
22,072
Location
occupied NY
SonOfSun said:
Barr said, “Well, that’s not a valid form of protest because it’s a violation of the law. There is time and place for protests,

Sounds like shit a fascist would say.... "There's a time and place for protests".... as in you can protest when nobody else is around. Fuck him.


and the federal statute makes it clear if you go to the house of a judge, the residence of a judge to influence the judge in his decisions and demonstrate that that’s a federal crime

Sounds like a bullshit law and unconstitutional at that. The whole point of every protest is to influence government actions. More fascist shit from Barr. Yeah you can protest, just not the people making decision because it might influence them. Get the F outta here with that nonsense.
Click to expand...

I have to admit, you've got a point.
 
tirwin1

tirwin1

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
12,733
Reaction score
33,120
Location
rochester
SonOfSun said:
Barr said, “Well, that’s not a valid form of protest because it’s a violation of the law. There is time and place for protests,

Sounds like shit a fascist would say.... "There's a time and place for protests".... as in you can protest when nobody else is around. Fuck him.


and the federal statute makes it clear if you go to the house of a judge, the residence of a judge to influence the judge in his decisions and demonstrate that that’s a federal crime

Sounds like a bullshit law and unconstitutional at that. The whole point of every protest is to influence government actions. More fascist shit from Barr. Yeah you can protest, just not the people making decision because it might influence them. Get the F outta here with that nonsense.
Click to expand...
Congratulations! You are part of the mob. Protesting at public buildings is different than taking it to the homes of supreme court justices. If you can't see the difference there is no hope for you. Civilized society depends upon norms of behavior and limits on the baser instinct of people. But I guess anything goes for people that aren't on your side.
 
SonOfSun

SonOfSun

.308 Win
Messages
4,015
Reaction score
4,726
Location
WNY
tirwin1 said:
Congratulations! You are part of the mob. Protesting at public buildings is different than taking it to the homes of supreme court justices. If you can't see the difference there is no hope for you. Civilized society depends upon norms of behavior and limits on the baser instinct of people. But I guess anything goes for people that aren't on your side.
Click to expand...
Nah, you get to protest government officials all you want. They're protesting public government officials on public land... land that is paid for with their tax dollars. Outside the court, or on the sidewalk in front of their home, it's no different. I didn't agree with the trucker protest but I supported their right to do it. Rights are more important that anyone's personal desires - yours, mine, and yes even a supreme court justice.

If the justices being protested can't handle the criticism that comes with being a government official they could always, you know... opt out of being a government official - nobody is chaining them to a desk at the SC, they're free to leave any time. Then nobody would care about them. However, if they're going to make decisions that impact how people live their lives then they get to live with the publics' response to those choices and the ire of those that disagree with them. That's the breaks.
 
Acer-m14

Acer-m14

.950 JDJ
Messages
34,558
Reaction score
36,361
Location
Livingston
SonOfSun said:
Barr said, “Well, that’s not a valid form of protest because it’s a violation of the law. There is time and place for protests,

Sounds like shit a fascist would say.... "There's a time and place for protests".... as in you can protest when nobody else is around. Fuck him.


and the federal statute makes it clear if you go to the house of a judge, the residence of a judge to influence the judge in his decisions and demonstrate that that’s a federal crime

Sounds like a bullshit law and unconstitutional at that. The whole point of every protest is to influence government actions. More fascist shit from Barr. Yeah you can protest, just not the people making decision because it might influence them. Get the F outta here with that nonsense.
Click to expand...
tirwin1 said:
Congratulations! You are part of the mob. Protesting at public buildings is different than taking it to the homes of supreme court justices. If you can't see the difference there is no hope for you. Civilized society depends upon norms of behavior and limits on the baser instinct of people. But I guess anything goes for people that aren't on your side.
Click to expand...


go protest at a NYSP house and see what happens .. ;)
 
spat

spat

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,040
Reaction score
54,146
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
SonOfSun said:
The decision was set to come out in June at the end of the SC session. That's still well before November elections. No need to leak if if that's your goal. Heck, waiting until it was closer would be better if that was their goal.

If the leak had a political purpose I think it would more to be influence the decision itself and not drum up votes.
Click to expand...
Could be to push other things out of the news cycle.

When a story is on every front page, you have to wonder what story is being buried.
 
spat

spat

.700 Nitro Express
Messages
26,040
Reaction score
54,146
Location
Formerly Geneseo, NY. Now free in AZ
SonOfSun said:
Barr said, “Well, that’s not a valid form of protest because it’s a violation of the law. There is time and place for protests,

Sounds like shit a fascist would say.... "There's a time and place for protests".... as in you can protest when nobody else is around. Fuck him.


and the federal statute makes it clear if you go to the house of a judge, the residence of a judge to influence the judge in his decisions and demonstrate that that’s a federal crime

Sounds like a bullshit law and unconstitutional at that. The whole point of every protest is to influence government actions. More fascist shit from Barr. Yeah you can protest, just not the people making decision because it might influence them. Get the F outta here with that nonsense.
Click to expand...
Time, place, and manor are the well established legal criteria for legally limiting speech.

You may not agree with that, but you certainly need it to be applied consistently.

When the government applies those limits sometimes, but ignores then when they like the speech, that is a recipe for totalitarianism.

So, either give these guys the Jan 6th treatment, or GTFO.
 
Last edited:
tirwin1

tirwin1

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
12,733
Reaction score
33,120
Location
rochester
SonOfSun said:
Nah, you get to protest government officials all you want. They're protesting public government officials on public land... land that is paid for with their tax dollars. Outside the court, or on the sidewalk in front of their home, it's no different.
Click to expand...
Pure sophistry. Actually it is quite different. The fact you don't see that speaks volumes about you.
 
Dr. Evil

Dr. Evil

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,053
Reaction score
74,289
Location
My Underground Lair
Dr. Evil

Dr. Evil

20×102mm Vulcan
Messages
35,053
Reaction score
74,289
Location
My Underground Lair
rumble.com

Biden's Treasury Sec. Janet Yellen Says Abortion is Good for the Economy

For more exclusive interviews, insight, and analysis like this, SUBSCRIBE to The Charlie Kirk Show TODAY: https://apple.co/2VCxGsh And for EVEN MORE—tune in to The Charlie Kirk Show LIVE on Salem Radi
rumble.com rumble.com

Really Janet? How about they stop having guys dump their load inside of them? Oh yeah, Tim Scott's last line? BOOM!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top