stokes
.338 Win Mag
If he hasnt done it yet, I dont think he will. He's a true dem and I will never trust him.I bet he becomes the first Kennedy to switch parties
If he hasnt done it yet, I dont think he will. He's a true dem and I will never trust him.I bet he becomes the first Kennedy to switch parties
If he hasnt done it yet, I dont think he will. He's a true dem and I will never trust him.
I realized long ago that party affiliation means nothing.....actions are everything. A few good apples on each side, a LOT of bad apples on both sides.I do not think Party means all that much to him. He has an idea and a vision. I am watching him and his actions closely/
Agreed, Trump is not a Republican/.I realized long ago that party affiliation means nothing.....actions are everything. A few good apples on each side, a LOT of bad apples on both sides.
The real sides aren't Democrats vs Republicans.I realized long ago that party affiliation means nothing.....actions are everything. A few good apples on each side, a LOT of bad apples on both sides.
And that is what makes him palpable.Agreed, Trump is not a Republican/.
They PHYSICALLY removed her from the Building!I think the trump administration now has an idea of which FBI agents need to be fired.
Whistleblower: Multiple FBI Agents Called In Sick With 'Blue Flu' To Avoid Helping ICE Round-Up Criminal Illegals In Chicago | ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zerowww.zerohedge.com
Just like the USDA inspector general, these people who self identify as democratic party operatives will not like the ultimate outcome.
Useful idiots comes to mind , plus they are expendable .The real sides aren't Democrats vs Republicans.
It isn't even liberals vs conservatives.
It is deep state globalists vs Americans.
The liberal democrats outside of the party elite are just dupes. They're like the privates in the German Army in 1943. They're not bad people, they're just following evil leaders because they have been duped.
Cry me a river snowflake. I'm impressed she figured out 1.5 hours each way was a total of 3 hours.
Its actually kinda scary that there are so many people this unhinged over such trivial bullshit out there. Its like they are programmed, or as I've said before, brainwashed. Its the damned cell phones and social media. Imagine how bad its gonna get when its all driven by AI.
They PHYSICALLY removed her from the Building!
Not just expendable, after "The revolution" they are the first to go.Useful idiots comes to mind , plus they are expendable .
From my conversation last night:He's lucky no one is talking of hard charges like sedition. An easy case could be made for that one. Fucking turd.
Robin
Calling your opinion program "news" is false advertising.From my conversation last night:
"He saved us from WWIII with China"
"He didn't actually say he would call China if the U.S. decided to attack"
"Trump is a dictator who wants to expand our borders, just like his buddy, Putin"
"Our Democracy hasn't been at risk like this, ever"
"Trump is putting in people who have no idea how to do the job they are getting"
ad nauseum.
Sooner or later Trump's FCC needs to get all of these "news" organizations either shut down, or told they cannot use the term "news" in their name/advertising/statements.
Funny I read that there needs to be no acceptance for the pardon to be valid. The two death row inmates don’t want to accept it because they think it will be seen as an admission of guilt is what I read. No expert though and don’t remember what source it was but I think it was associated press.I'm hoping Brandons pardons get washed. From what I see, a person has to accept the pardon by signing an admission of guilt to a specific crime. There are already 2 people on death row that opted not to sign and accept the pardon. These other fuckers that got "preemptive" pardons should be disqualified.
Deterrence is the cheapest and safest option.
You are correct that a pardon need not be accepted, and is not considered an admission of guilt. The two guys on death row are fighting the pardons in court. They would not need to do so if they could simply refuse to accept them.Funny I read that there needs to be no acceptance for the pardon to be valid. The two death row inmates don’t want to accept it because they think it will be seen as an admission of guilt is what I read. No expert though and don’t remember what source it was but I think it was associated press.
Dont remember where I saw the other view, but I went looking and it seems a lot of facets of the pardon rules and procedures are the result of court decisions on challenges over the years. The act of granting a preemptive pardon, Nixons is the only one I found, have never been challenged in court as yet.Funny I read that there needs to be no acceptance for the pardon to be valid. The two death row inmates don’t want to accept it because they think it will be seen as an admission of guilt is what I read. No expert though and don’t remember what source it was but I think it was associated press.
Near the end of President Trump's first term, all of the legal scholars interpreted Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 to mean that accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt. Now that the pardons have been issued by Biden, the interpretation is not clear.You are correct that a pardon need not be accepted, and is not considered an admission of guilt. The two guys on death row are fighting the pardons in court. They would not need to do so if they could simply refuse to accept them.