Anyone who supports Disney is the enemy. Those also who support Climate Change, Ukraine, Vaxxers, open borders, Money Laundering to foreign shores. Ignorant Communists! You can't be on the side of America if you support these.
As would I, but I wouldn't call that victory.Depends on your perspective. I'd literally burn my house down before I let someone else just take it.
Even if Russia wins they will only get to be lord of the ashes.
Transnistria has huge stockpiles of Soviet era ammo and artillery shells that Ukraine desperately needs.
I read Britain has about a Brigade of Infantry (2000 ? soldiers)Can I get an Amen! Of course, I would assume the Russians have it rigged to blow in place in case of attack. It would have to be the Ukrainians to do it.
Franceand Britian are talking out their ass'es . Neither can field an army capable of beating the Russians thier militay has been gutted for the last 30 years, The Us did all the heavy lifting for NATO while these socialist bastards sat back and laughed Trump was the only one who made them pay into NATO . Well now here we are.
Our Navy's Army has the 5th largest Airforce in the world (Marine Corp Air wing)I read Britain has about a Brigade of Infantry (2000 ? soldiers)
France has about a Division of Infantry (10,000 ?)
Don't we have 2 Brigades of one of our Airborne Divisions in Poland?
How did we come to this? Source: Operator 13 The NATO Air Force entered the territory of Ukraine to practice strikes on Crimea "Against the background of a published conversation between German generals about the attacks on the Crimean Bridge, three NATO aircraft flew into Ukrainian airspace from Romania today. Two F 16s and one F 35.
The planes simulated missile strikes from the territory of the Mykolaiv region in the Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation. Among other things, Patriot air defense systems and 3 mobile radars in the Kherson and Zaporizhia regions actively accompanied these three aircraft. In addition to practicing strikes on the Crimea, the F 35 aircraft actively tried to track the location of Russian radars and radar on the front line. The entire operation lasted about 32 minutes, after which all the planes left Ukrainian airspace.
We have already written that American fighters will be based in Romania. The peculiarity of the F-16 is their "capriciousness")) The runway needs to be perfectly smooth. There are no such people in Ukraine. The West is escalating the conflict, which will inevitably spread beyond the borders of Ukraine. But not with tank battles, but with missile strikes on NATO infrastructure." If Russia does not stop this trend of NATO escalation of the conflict, a major war is inevitable. Force can only be broken by force, not by impotent threats, no matter how terrible they are. Nuclear test explosions, strikes on NATO military installations involved in this war, can stop the escalation of the conflict on the part of NATO. Sergey Lavrov will not stop this.
Obviously done to locate radar and missile sites to hit at a later time. Looks like they want to hit that bridge again and Knock out the defenses before hand.
These dumbasses are playing a very dangerous game, and as an American citizen trying to mind my own business 5000 miles away I don't like it at all.
Stop trying to get us dragged into WW3 you evil greedy evil psychopaths.
I said earlier in this thread that Ukrainian (NATO donated) F16s will be based in Poland, the Baltics or Romania due to the infrastructure. How is Russia to know which country is flying the F16s out of those airfields that is attacking them? They won't. They will have to treat them all as hostile and they will have to attack their origination airfields.
We are already in WW3, it's just that all the countries haven't finished setting up their play tactics.
I keep seeing shit on MSN and YouTube ads about what if "nukes hit the US" and "nukes hit all over"... and "what to do if nukes start falling"... and "what will nukes do to the weather"... this shit ain't just made up on whim. Folks know what is going to happen here in the next year or two.
I've made up my mind, I keep prepping, but know that in the back of my mind, I might be a casualty. Shitty situation, but the red flags are all over the place.
If I'm wrong, then thank God.
If this escalates into a full blown shooting war between NATO and Russia/China, then history will record the start date as Feb 24, 2022.I think WW3 has already started most just don't realize it yet.
Ww2 wasn't "labeled" as being world war 2 in 1939, it was after the fact and 1939 was the date given on for the start. You could argue it started even earlier. But that's what historians on the winning side do, they write the history.
We're likely already in ww3 and at some point in the future there will be historians that look back as say... Oh looks like the best start date for WW3 was xx,xx,xxxx
What a bunch of bullshit.
This is a momentous occasion, there is no right side!!!!!!! They are all corrupt. so, which is the wrongest? The blood thirsty aggressor Putin, easy peasy.
Robin
Just my opinion guy. What specifically did you think was false?What a bunch of bullshit.
This is a momentous occasion, there is no right side!!!!!!! They are all corrupt. so, which is the wrongest? The blood thirsty aggressor Putin, easy peasy.
Robin
For one, in the Cuban missile crisis, NATO and the Warsaw Pact were peers.Just my opinion guy. What specifically did you think was false?
The wrongest? Id say The side that illegally overthrew the Ukrainian government in 2014 then armed them for the last 10 years , Id say the side that made zelensky turn down the peace offer knowing it meant war.
How is this any different than the Cuban missile crisis ?
For one, in the Cuban missile crisis, NATO and the Warsaw Pact were peers.
Russia is not a peer to NATO.
You asked how the Ukraine situation was different than the Cuban missile crisis.What are you talking about?
I fail to see the significance, another difference is that the Cubans speak Spanish.You asked how the Ukraine situation was different than the Cuban missile crisis.
I listed *one* of the ways.
Another is that Ukraine wasn't installing nuclear missiles that could hit Moscow before the warnings even sounded.
You fail to see the difference between a satellite state of a near peer enemy, and an recent ally of a much superior power ?I fail to see the significance, another difference is that the Cubans speak Spanish.
Yeah, not yet.
Russia, and some on this forum, seem to be unwilling to acknowledge that the relationship between NATO and Russia is so massively unbalanced that any difference Ukraine could make is irrelevant.
NATO would absolutely curb stomp Russia in a war, r
You fail to see the difference between a satellite state of a near peer enemy, and an recent ally of a much superior power ?
The bottom line is that the missiles in Cuba were a major escalation in what was a balanced power relationship.
Russia, and some on this forum, seem to be unwilling to acknowledge that the relationship between NATO and Russia is so massively unbalanced that any difference Ukraine could make is irrelevant.
Think of it this way. You have a gang standoff with 5 guys on each side, and one side is trying to bring in #6, that's going to completely change the dynamic of the situation.
But, if it's 5 guys on one side and 25 on the other, bringing in #26 doesn't matter much.
NATO would absolutely curb stomp Russia in a war, regardless of what Ukraine does. That's why Russia trying to make anything out of it is ridiculous.