holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Agree for the most part. We're all just spitballing. Time will tell.
Now that is an accurate statement.
Agree for the most part. We're all just spitballing. Time will tell.
I mentioned this up a few posts, I was going to post the video once I got home.
50 tanks x300 gallons 15,000 gallons per 8 hr
- M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank. Fuel Consumption A tank will need approximately 300 gallons every eight hours; this will vary depending on mission, terrain, and weather. A single tank takes 10 minutes to refuel.
My read is they are desperate.
15,000 gallons per 8 hours! Throw in some fuel for bradleys
For example, an armor company comprising 14 M2 Bradley fighting vehicles is conducting a one-day operation on rugged terrain. In a 24-hour period, the Bradleys are expected to be at a tactical idle for 16 hours and traverse conditions for eight hours. Expected fuel consumption at idle would be calculated in the following way: 14 × 1.4 GPH × 16 = ~314 gallons Expected fuel consumption during operations on rugged terrain is calculated like this: 14 × 18 GPH × 8 = 2,016 gallons Next, we add the products to find the total amount of fuel required. ~314 gallons + 2,016 gallons = ~2,330 gallons
Lol... Not exactly Green so to say.50 tanks x300 gallons 15,000 gallons per 8 hr
- M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank. Fuel Consumption A tank will need approximately 300 gallons every eight hours; this will vary depending on mission, terrain, and weather. A single tank takes 10 minutes to refuel.
My read is they are desperate.
15,000 gallons per 8 hours! Throw in some fuel for bradleys
For example, an armor company comprising 14 M2 Bradley fighting vehicles is conducting a one-day operation on rugged terrain. In a 24-hour period, the Bradleys are expected to be at a tactical idle for 16 hours and traverse conditions for eight hours. Expected fuel consumption at idle would be calculated in the following way: 14 × 1.4 GPH × 16 = ~314 gallons Expected fuel consumption during operations on rugged terrain is calculated like this: 14 × 18 GPH × 8 = 2,016 gallons Next, we add the products to find the total amount of fuel required. ~314 gallons + 2,016 gallons = ~2,330 gallons
No f-16s and Apaches are though.Tanks? They don't have what they need with the 100+ billion we gave them? What's next F35's?
Even if they do, they cant run them out of Ukraine. they have to come from Poland which gives the Russians a hell of lead time.No f-16s and Apaches are though.
100%. Lock it in.
I think you're right.Honestly, I believe they seriously miscalculated the situation. Im pretty sure they expected the Ukraine army and the people to jump in on their side and it would be a cake walk like Czechoslovakia . a few days of sporadic fighting and its over .
they expected a beer run .
I think you're right.
The question is, did they make that mistake all on their own, or were they led there like Saddam was..
I believe the real war is getting ready to begin.
I think you're right.
The question is, did they make that mistake all on their own, or were they led there like Saddam was..
Considering that they overthrew the Ukrainian government, then armed them to the teeth for the last eight years , then crossed a well known, well established, red line, outlined in the Maiden agreement which would knowingly lead to war , Useing Ukraine as a money laundering operation and conducting illegal bio lab experiments in which they knew all evidence would be destroyed, I lean toward the ""lead to war"" theory.
The why is because Russia did not want to give up her sovereignty to join the brotherhood of globalism
We would not invade Mexico.I think it's every bit as much about maintaining sovereignty as it is a buffer for an ever incrementally closing in NATO.
If the Warsaw pact was taking over Cuba, Venezuela, Brazil, central America and was moving up towards Mexico, what do you think the US would do? We would probably invade Mexico to get it first to give us a buffer zone.
the writing is on the wall. the Ukraine is slowly crumbling , NATO is probably going to step in at some point.I posted earlier in the thread 7 b52s were spotted leaving conus flying in formation east towards Europe..
Off the top of my head just the past month if I'm recalling correctly the US has committed to giving Ukraine
30ish Abrams
A patriot battery or 3
About 100 strykers
About 50 bradleys
About 50 mraps
About 50 humvees
More himars and Ionger range rockets
I'm sure they're also shipping lots of more logistical replenishment munitions as well.
That's what I can recall just from the past month and that's just the US.
We are equipping the Ukrainians to be our proxy army.
We're probably just a month away from hearing about f16s and Apaches being gifted too.
Reports are coming in of very unusual military movements. Trains full of armor heading to the coast. Etc very ominous developments all happening. I watch this YouTube channel and it's great, I'll give it a recommend.
And this channel
The 101st deployment just got extended and is now larger
![]()
U.S. Extends Troop Deployment in Romania, at Ukraine War’s Doorstep (Published 2023)
The buildup is part of President Biden’s commitment to increase American forces in Europe in response to the Russian invasion last February.www.nytimes.com
Every day the little breadcrumbs are right there in full sight for everyone to pick-up the indicators and clues.
We're a ball hair away from getting dragged into this war. I do not want American blood spilled because of greedy evil power hungry sociopaths. In ww3 the American homeland will not be spared. Our enemies can reach across the ocean with missiles, planes, electrons, sleeper cells, and computer codes.
What are we doing. Virtually no one I talk to is worried about this.
Etc
yupI think it's every bit as much about maintaining sovereignty as it is a buffer for an ever incrementally closing in NATO.
If the Warsaw pact was taking over Cuba, Venezuela, Brazil, central America and was moving up towards Mexico, what do you think the US would do? We would probably invade Mexico to get it first to give us a buffer zone.
NATO is being very careful not to let Ukraine get too much offensive capability.the writing is on the wall. the Ukraine is slowly crumbling , NATO is probably going to step in at some point.
Its really a beautiful cover story for a build up of military equipment without anyone asking questions
I dont believe Russia will use nukes unless her territory is under attack and she is losing . If she knows she cant win then shes taking everybody with her.
the Russians claim 3000 tanks destroyed, if its anywhere close to being true, the Ukrainians are out of tanks or close to it. thats why she is begging the west for heavy tanks , She doesn't have enough for an offensive.
However those modern tanks are going to be met with a sky full of drones and heavy artillery land mines, and kornet antitank missiles. there will be losses unless NATO goes all in
NATO is being very careful not to let Ukraine get too much offensive capability.
They're all about giving Ukraine the ability to grind the Russian military into dust on their territory, but they do not want them attacking into Russia at all.
This is classic western stupidity, it's what lost us every war we've ever lost.
Either you fight to win, or you do not fight.
We fought to stalemate in Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan and look what happened. We fight until we get bored, because we refuse to win.
What are we doing. Virtually no one I talk to is worried about this.
Etc
No shit. That’s messed up man. Cool fact but seriously messed up. My wife’s aunts mom had the numbers tattooed on her from her stay at a camp. I never met her but I sure wish I had. The people that lived through that amaze me and I can’t believe they don’t hold more hate for the Germans.I think Germany needs a litle guidance. They have a tendancy to overdo. I am going to write to them tomorrow. Can't hurt. Last time German tanks rolled into Ukraine, they killed half of my family. Our family name is listed in the Holocaust museum in Washington.
I don’t get the tank move. Why now? I guess it will take months to train them on our tanks but the German ones are easier to use? I don’t know but it just amazes me
I posted earlier in the thread 7 b52s were spotted leaving conus flying in formation east towards Europe..
Off the top of my head just the past month if I'm recalling correctly the US has committed to giving Ukraine
30ish Abrams
A patriot battery or 3
About 100 strykers
About 50 bradleys
About 50 mraps
About 50 humvees
More himars and Ionger range rockets
I'm sure they're also shipping lots of more logistical replenishment munitions as well.
That's what I can recall just from the past month and that's just the US.
We are equipping the Ukrainians to be our proxy army.
We're probably just a month away from hearing about f16s and Apaches being gifted too.
Reports are coming in of very unusual military movements. Trains full of armor heading to the coast. Etc very ominous developments all happening. I watch this YouTube channel and it's great, I'll give it a recommend.
And this channel
The 101st deployment just got extended and is now larger
![]()
U.S. Extends Troop Deployment in Romania, at Ukraine War’s Doorstep (Published 2023)
The buildup is part of President Biden’s commitment to increase American forces in Europe in response to the Russian invasion last February.www.nytimes.com
Every day the little breadcrumbs are right there in full sight for everyone to pick-up the indicators and clues.
We're a ball hair away from getting dragged into this war. I do not want American blood spilled because of greedy evil power hungry sociopaths. In ww3 the American homeland will not be spared. Our enemies can reach across the ocean with missiles, planes, electrons, sleeper cells, and computer codes.
What are we doing. Virtually no one I talk to is worried about this.
Etc
We won't provide the intelligence or support for that. Our government wants to degrade the military capacity of Russia and we'll sacrifice as many Ukrainian lives as possible to accomplish this. Hell the ghouls in Washington probably won't mind if both armies are effectively destroyed as a result.Theres truth to what your saying, given the opportunity, The Ukrainians would want some payback , they cant be trusted to follow the plan.
The more damage that happens to Ukraine, the more they can skim off the rebuilding contracts.We won't provide the intelligence or support for that. Our government wants to degrade the military capacity of Russia and we'll sacrifice as many Ukrainian lives as possible to accomplish this. Hell the ghouls in Washington probably won't mind if both armies are effectively destroyed as a result.
I'm not sure that this is a complete assessment with regards to "western stupidity."NATO is being very careful not to let Ukraine get too much offensive capability.
They're all about giving Ukraine the ability to grind the Russian military into dust on their territory, but they do not want them attacking into Russia at all.
This is classic western stupidity, it's what lost us every war we've ever lost.
Either you fight to win, or you do not fight.
We fought to stalemate in Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan and look what happened. We fight until we get bored, because we refuse to win.