Virginia man arrested for Criminal Possession of a Weapon
- Thread starter GOYABEAN
- Start date
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
So what oath did I specifically violate? What did I do specifically?
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
So you are saying that I was there?
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
And if you somehow have proof that I was there, what did I do specifically at that detention center?
Do you know what my MOS was?
Do you know what my MOS was?
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Weren't you a probation officer or something? The thin blue line wouldn't pertain to you if so.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
@Rocpo ! Where are you? I have all night until about 4 or 5 am to chat with you. Come back please.
Now that has to be about the stupidest thing you have ever said, and there have been too many to count!!
Five Conservative Justices ruled in favor of Heller and you think adding Four more will overturn it?
SCOTUS was wrong on all gun cases .. period!!!! .. the bloods , MS13 , ect ect .. still carry concealed weapons
so what was prohibited ?? "concealed weapons can be prohibited "
2A is the red headed step child from all the other amendments
PS .. your pocket knife is a CCW
"SCOTUS was wrong on all gun cases .. period!!!! .. " Please point out where they were wrong in Heller and McDonald ( Heller established the individual right and McDonald incorporated it to the States )
Yes "concealed weapons can be prohibited " and a License allows for you to CCW! (In 49 States, even those that are now Constitutional Carry still issue CCW licenses) So are the " the bloods , MS13 , ect ect .. still carry concealed weapons" being allow to CCW? Are they not charged when caught?
And yes "PS .. your pocket knife is a CCW
" it is a CCW and prohibited in places like NYC!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Went right over your head.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
You are like groundhogs day. You lose this argument in every thread and then 2 weeks later, you say the same exact thing. It's like your mind is already made up. No matter what facts are thrown your way, you repeat the same thing that got destroyed 2 weeks prior."SCOTUS was wrong on all gun cases .. period!!!! .. " Please point out where they were wrong in Heller and McDonald ( Heller established the individual right and McDonald incorporated it to the States )
Yes "concealed weapons can be prohibited " and a License allows for you to CCW! (In 49 States, even those that are now Constitutional Carry still issue CCW licenses) So are the " the bloods , MS13 , ect ect .. still carry concealed weapons" being allow to CCW? Are they not charged when caught?
And yes "PS .. your pocket knife is a CCW
Sorry but again I have never lost this argument! I do have to leave this site from time to time for work and other thing's in life!
As far as your facts Will Quotes of the founding are not laws, And that George Washington would want to CCW the really makes me laugh!
The Fact is that in 228 years since the BOR's was ratified not one Court has ruled in favor of Concealed Carry of Weapons! All those Courts are corrupt, you are delusional!
As far as your facts Will Quotes of the founding are not laws, And that George Washington would want to CCW the really makes me laugh!
The Fact is that in 228 years since the BOR's was ratified not one Court has ruled in favor of Concealed Carry of Weapons! All those Courts are corrupt, you are delusional!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Oh. Boy.
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
And yes "PS .. your pocket knife is a CCW
and is in violation of the 2nd Amendment too ..
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
@Willjr75 The original Philadelphia Deringer was a single-shot muzzleloading percussion cap pistol introduced in 1852
did they open carry it or CCW it
did they open carry it or CCW it
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
According to some, they open carried it.@Willjr75 The original Philadelphia Deringer was a single-shot muzzleloading percussion cap pistol introduced in 1852
did they open carry it or CCW it
We keep going back and forth, back and forth about some of the same issues.
Many, many, many years ago, bad guys, doing bad guy things would carry conceal. Most people way back when, open carried. Times were very, very different.
We cannot always compare today to yesteryear.
In regards to CCW compared to OC, I just wish we had the personal option.
Many, many, many years ago, bad guys, doing bad guy things would carry conceal. Most people way back when, open carried. Times were very, very different.
We cannot always compare today to yesteryear.
In regards to CCW compared to OC, I just wish we had the personal option.
Acer-m14
.950 JDJ
just going from western movies .. they all opened carried .. why ?? to to look cool and tuff .. .. disputes were settled at high noon .. sucks we lost that tradition ...
and still today bad guys carry concealed .. no matter how many laws are made up and passed ...
but way way way back .. like the 1800's deringer .. who got arrested for a CCW with no permit .. ?
wish for the same option .. and to find out how i transport a BP pistol with no components to someone that can shoot it hummm LOL
Some fail to understand, just like leftists, that we should still be able to converse as rational humans (a common occurrence in "yesteryears"). Simply bringing up facts does not imply anything else, and should not immediately illicit sarcasm, anger, and in some cases, outright trolling.
@GOPerfect you are right about having the personal option of both! But I think some here think that if we fight for OC we would lose CCW! That will not happen and it would at the least do away with restricted licenses, JMO!
just going from western movies .. they all opened carried .. why ?? to to look cool and tuff .. .. disputes were settled at high noon .. sucks we lost that tradition ...
and still today bad guys carry concealed .. no matter how many laws are made up and passed ...
but way way way back .. like the 1800's deringer .. who got arrested for a CCW with no permit .. ?
wish for the same option .. and to find out how i transport a BP pistol with no components to someone that can shoot it hummm LOL
You ask "like the 1800's deringer .. who got arrested for a CCW with no permit .. ?" Most likely people did in some places and not in other places, The Court said concealed weapons can be prohibited, not that they ARE or MUST be! That is why every State has there own License (or no license now in some cases)
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
The Court said. The Court said. The Court said. The Court said.
That's all we get from you. What about the Constitution said? What about the Founder's said?
It's amazing how much faith you put into these courts when you yourself said that the decision could sway one way based on the makeup of the Court or another way based on the makeup at any given time. You even said that Scalia had to sell it the Democratic judges.
That's all we get from you. What about the Constitution said? What about the Founder's said?
It's amazing how much faith you put into these courts when you yourself said that the decision could sway one way based on the makeup of the Court or another way based on the makeup at any given time. You even said that Scalia had to sell it the Democratic judges.
Sorry I never said he had to sell it to Democratic judges! (all 4 of them were sure NO's) Kennedy was the swing vote they needed. (And by the way he was a Republican appointed by President Reagan) And before you come down on him he was 81 and seemed to be in good health, he did retire to give Trump a 2nd pick (Brett Kavanaugh) that seems to be a stronger Conservative then Kennedy was.
If not the Court system Will who then decides? The people? Remember we are what they call the III% er's
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Yes you did. You did so in the other thread.
Who decides? It's a broken system that needs to be replaced. But just because it's all we have it doesn't mean we need to accept their corruption.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Corruption from those in the black robes that's
talk the system wouldn't allow anything like that ever happening
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Yep. When you have judges that can't rule as per the Constitution and they are all of a certain political party, it's corruption. The same goes with Republicans and abortion. It's not supposed to be that way. Judges are supposed to be impartial and rule as per the Constitution whether they like it or not.Corruption from those in the black robes that's
Last edited:
Quote the other thread that I said he had to sell it to the Democrat Judges!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
There too many threads where we had this type of discussion but I remember clearly you said that Scalia had to sell it to the other justices after I called him a traitor for inserting that Trojan horse that the 2A isn't an unlimited right.
I'm sure you remember that thread. It was the one where I called him a crafty traitor that duped us all.
I will respond to this later.
No Will in post #112 you said that I said Scalia had to sell in to the Democrat Judges!
And now I know what your so-called Trojan horse is that you think that Scalia came up with the 2A is not unlimited! And that he was a traitor for inserting it. Well Will it just show me that you really never read the whole Heller case! That was not his doing that was from a SCOTUS opinion from a 101 years earlier that I have posted many times before,
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
In incorporating these principles into the fundamental law, there was no intention of disregarding the exceptions, which continued to be recognized as if they had been formally expressed. Thus, the freedom of speech and of the press ( article 1) does not permit the publication of libels, blasphemous or indecent articles, or other publications injurious to public morals or private reputation; the right of the people [165 U.S. 275, 282] to keep and bear arms (article 2) is not infringed by laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons; the provision that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy (article 5) does not prevent a second trial, if upon the first trial the jury failed to agree, or if the verdict was set aside upon the defendant's motion (U. S. v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662, 627 , 16 S. Sup. Ct. 1192);
Here's another you wouldn't like!
Robertson V. Baldwin (1897)