And now read what his stance is, and think about that.
What gun laws do you support.
- Thread starter Edwardteach72
- Start date
I see your point.
But, it can be read either way.
He could be saying if you are free, you should be able to own a gun.
Orrrr
He could be saying that sinse you are not free, you shouldnt own a gun.
It's both.
If you can't be trusted with a gun, you are too dangerous to be in society.
I agree 100%
Unfortunately we dont live in that world.
And it doesnt exist i this country.
Even the most strict conservative, law loving states have 10s of thousands of violent criminals walking the streets.
Ive said many times that I would rather my taxes go towards more prisons rather than welfare and housing undocumented aliens.
spat
.950 JDJ
And you think it's safe to let them run free if you just ask them nicely not to buy any guns ?
Any one of those guys will have a weapon hours after you let them out, no law you can pass will fix that.
Anything other than keeping them locked up is useless.
spat
.950 JDJ
No, we do not want them running around free.
Are you really going to feel safer because there will be one more charge to tack on next time one of these guys shoots someone ?
If people spent as much energy changing the catch and release plan as they do trying to control guns these guys would be under the jail.
spat
.950 JDJ
I am saying if you identify someone who can't be trusted with access to a gun you should lock them up.
Ditto
This is pretty close to my opinion as well.
Crazy, unstable and proven violent people should not have guns.
Soccer mom who needs mommy's little helper to cope with her disappointing life. Sure good to go.
Dad's who drink every night because they can't handle their nagging wives and ungrateful kids. No problem.
Crazy Carl down the road who is building a backyard bunker. Yep no problem
Shoplifting Steve, sure once he serves his time.
The world is made up of imperfect people. Small transgressions or mistakes should not cause you to lose a natural right.
It's ok to be different. Having different views, opinions and attitudes shouldn't negatively go against you. If you are worried about an impending alien invasion or are a guy who wants to be a girl, as long as you are not a threat to others, have at it. Live you life. Your right is your right. People don't have to agree with it but it should in no way cause you to lose a right.
^^^This 1 right here!^^^ WITHOUT exceptions!! I don't believe there should be restrictions of our Constitutional rights, period. If someone is a felon, serves their time, including parole (which is indirectly part of their sentence!!), then they should be able to own a gun. If more people were properly armed, the chances of recidivism would probably go down. That shit would solve itself. If the 2nd amendment wasn't being so infringed upon, there wouldn't be as much crime.
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.", Robert A. Heinlein
I couldn't agree more with the above quote, I see it down here, where it is pretty much a safe bet that the mass majority of Folks are carrying!! AND, we do not have shoot outs at high noon, and blood running in the streets as the gun-grabbing snowflakes want you to believe!!!
Agree 100%
Exactly
There are people who cannot be rehabilitated no matter how any times the are incarcerated.
There are gys with 30-40-50 arrests over 30 years. They have proven they cannot be trusted......but they are free.
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
Exactly the type of guy that doesn’t need a gun because he hurts our cause and he’s kill someone. I also agree with this guy should not be released from prison but at what point do you make that call. The 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th arrest? I also think at some point those doing life in prison if they continue to commit crimes or hurt others they should just be put to death.
But, there are people who cannot mentally handle gun ownership.
Heck, in the days of our founders there were groups that were denied guns.
Slaves, freed slaves, whites who refused to support the revolution and yes, violent criminals were denied.
And carrying concealed was seen as cowardly.
We are talking about seriously violent criminals, they exist and WILL kill you f necessary.
Oooh ok so because freed slaves and turncoat loyalist were denied guns it's ok to continue that anti 2A sentiment now??
"wE aRe tAlKiNg aBoUt sErIoUsLy vIoLeNt CrImInAls"
The good news is it's currently illegal for them to be in possession of a gun so few we are all safe.. thank God
I understand the rest of your post, BUT, this part here ^^^ I have a problem with.
There are problems in our legal system. If they are violent, which would insinuate that they have been charged with some type of violent crime, then they should not be getting out any time soon. Add that to the fact that the prison system needs to be 're-tooled' so as to be a form of punishment, not an EFing social club, where it becomes 'old home week' when someone goes back in. Make prison a place where someone ABSOLUTELY fears having to go back to.
Get rid of the plea deal, get rid of early release, and get back to real sentences. It makes me crazy when I read that someone is convicted of murder, and gets a sentence of 20-30 years. WTF happened to 'serious' sentences, in 'serious' prisons? I think that might mitigate the 'seriously violent criminal' problem we have here.
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
So, how many violent felons do we think don't have guns because its illegal? They're pretty easy to get, despite the legal restrictions.
I don't even think guns are more dangerous than other commonly accessible items. A lot of people were killed 25 years ago today with diesel fuel and fertilizer in Oklahoma City. In 1990, 87 people were killed by arson at the Happyland Social Club. I imagine a well motivated but unskilled individual could do a lot more harm with 5-10 gallons of gasoline than they could with a handgun or a rifle. But we regulate the crap out of guns more than gas and diesel because its more politically convenient.
I don't even think guns are more dangerous than other commonly accessible items. A lot of people were killed 25 years ago today with diesel fuel and fertilizer in Oklahoma City. In 1990, 87 people were killed by arson at the Happyland Social Club. I imagine a well motivated but unskilled individual could do a lot more harm with 5-10 gallons of gasoline than they could with a handgun or a rifle. But we regulate the crap out of guns more than gas and diesel because its more politically convenient.
spat
.950 JDJ
How about something simple ? Every prison stint you have served previously is a multiplier on the sentence for the next conviction.
Your 12th conviction would mean a 12x sentence.
Only the most petty criminals would live long enough to be released and commit crime #12.
Toecutter
.308 Win
As far as felons go, right now their rights are automatically void on release, it shouldn’t be that way , every release should have rights restored, it should be on the state who needs to prove why they shout not have rights restored. That being said if someone is so far gone that they shouldn’t have a gun should they even be released?
I won’t get into how our prisons are ineffective, create criminals and make people worse then when they entered, that’s another problem for another discussion .
I won’t get into how our prisons are ineffective, create criminals and make people worse then when they entered, that’s another problem for another discussion .
Jsmegs77
.308 Win
I'm not a complicated person. OP's question was "What gun laws do you support?", and my statement is my baseline answer. No thought was given to current statutory infringements in the making of this answer =)
And just a note as to Criticalt's statement.... these characters mentioned, in a just society, would have been either incarcerated for life just by accumulation of charges, or shot and killed by someone responding to their violence. The existence of these, or people like them, does not influence my (for example) stance on gun laws. Crime and punishment is a separate category entire from "What gun laws do you support" and these are the absolute last people in society who would even think to obey a law anyway, as their life patterns have obviously proven. Why they are free to roam is more an indictment of the trainwreck that is our justice system, rather than anything to do with laws regarding firearms.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Uh?? So a thug robs a bank, insurance covers that, nobody is hurt and everyone is happy?
Also coyotes at the border are just human capital managers!
Did you take your meds today?
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
There are victims in both of those scenarios though.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Nobody is hurt. The bank gives a bonus for the stress . lol
The coyote gets an illegal across to have a job and the tomato farmer gets a good rate for labor. A win win situation.
Still victims.
Vs say, dude gets caught smoking weed, and has what the crown decides is more weight on him than for personal use so he must be a dealer (whether he is or not doesnt actually matter) and now thanks to the war on drugs, hes going to be doing 5 years .... victimless crime. = no crime
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
The situation is a lot more complex than what it seems.
If someone cannot get a job to deliver gasoline due to a screening process it could be that the same person should
not own a gun or operate dangerous machinery, etc...
Like an schizophrenic who all the sudden feels people dressing in black are the zombies and they need to be exterminated.
Perhaps there should be also a test to determine if a citizen is qualified to vote like many other things.
If someone cannot get a job to deliver gasoline due to a screening process it could be that the same person should
not own a gun or operate dangerous machinery, etc...
Like an schizophrenic who all the sudden feels people dressing in black are the zombies and they need to be exterminated.
Perhaps there should be also a test to determine if a citizen is qualified to vote like many other things.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Like no rule of law?
How is that no rule of law?
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I actually agree the drugs should be all legal and controlled so that will end the crime like in Portugal but if there is a law who decides what laws have victims or not and why? There is no time for debate or interpretation, if something is law or not it should be clear.