Woman detained for wearing a bikini - Myrtle Beach, SC police Department

[meketrefe]

UK has a problem with muslims trying to impose sharia law, therefore we need to loosen up our decency laws. GOT IT. Very convincing.

What I mean all laws apply to all humans the same. There will not be a law specific for anyone regardeless of color, gender, religion or whatever. Very simple concept.
In this case there is sex discrimination since guys can walk around topless and women cannot.
It is like the breast feeding Bs, who came up with the idea this is a tabu when it is the most natural thing in the world.
All man made BS rules.

 

[meketrefe]

I am pretty conservative but with certain things I have to remain open and socially advanving with the times otherwise we are stuck in the 18th century BS.

 

[Darth]

This is what I have tried and failed to explain on numerous occasions around here. The ubiquitous phone and camera and internet is a potential grenade given to kids, and many do not navigate it well, causing long term damage to themselves and others.

Anyway are there any more vids of Sam or...?

Oh I'd love to hear the backing for this.

 

[Darth]

I already explained how pushing the envelope of one freedom can impact another freedom where this will be used as an argument against. It's a major hurdle in pro-gun movement. "If we allow to own this, what's going to stop people from owning that" is a common anti-gun argument.

And it's just as wrong.

What is currently preventing one from owning a nuke?

 

[Darth]

As a sidebar,
Personally I hate when underwear wadges between my buttocks. It's a big turn off when I see this on a woman. I have been spoiled with sexy lingerie, stockings and gutter belts. Even women in burlesque pictures of 100 years ago looked sexier than this.

I always prefer the tease. I'd take a girl in stockings/pantyhose over bare any day. Same with tight clothing. Something about that tease is a big turn on for many.

 

[Darth]

View attachment 81853


So then this should be allowed on the beach right? I mean its covered.

Correct.

In fact, I believe it is...

 

[Blimey]

Oh I'd love to hear the backing for this.

Surely you aren’t challenging the notion that teens regularly get themselves into severe trouble on their phones.

 

[Darth]

Surely you aren’t challenging the notion that teens regularly get themselves into severe trouble on their phones.

As this thread was regarding "nudity" that is what the comment was directed at.

 

[Darth]

I think a few on this thread have to just admit it's something they personally don't like. But if it's not against the law (which in this case it wasn't since no nudity) then there's nothing that can be done. And if you agree with it not being against the law as was done with the beer bellied titty man example, then what the hell are you arguing about?

Yeah, it happens way too often.

And people always ask why I "defend" things that I don't personally agree with all the time. If you don't, you get this.

 

[Darth]

I disputed that because I don't see it on several beaches I go to.

I ate lunch today, ergo world hunger is a myth.

 

[Darth]

Ok, I've made it all the way through this one. Here is where we stand:

Some people claim that this is OK. Some claim it's nudity and should be banned.

As the default position is unlimited freedoms until they are taken away, we're going to need to hear from the "should be banned" side as to what the reasoning is for the ban.

What tangible threat exists to the populace from this?

Go.

 

[Mosinitis]

What I mean all laws apply to all humans the same. There will not be a law specific for anyone regardeless of color, gender, religion or whatever. Very simple concept.
In this case there is sex discrimination since guys can walk around topless and women cannot.
It is like the breast feeding Bs, who came up with the idea this is a tabu when it is the most natural thing in the world.
All man made BS rules.

I showed to you how men's and women's anatomies are treated differently by our legal system. Nothing odd about that.

 

[Marine Cpl]

Anyway. It isn’t illegal in Myrtle Beach as per their city ordinances. Case closed.

 

[Mosinitis]

Umm. Hold your horses. The case is open again.

They is no such ordinance on Myrtle Beach’s laws. It’s just written on the website that Nortatoga posted. That is not law. Here is Myrtle Beach’s city ordinances. Tell me where it bans thongs.

Chapter 5. BEACH AND BOATING REGULATIONS, CODE OF ORDINANCES, Code of Ordinances, Myrtle Beach

myrtlebeach-sc.elaws.us

It's the same interpretation of the law as was done by these cops.

 

[Mosinitis]

Negative. In every town in south America and Europe topless is everywhere. In Africa is a 50/50 obviosly excliding the Muslim countries where women have zero rights.
'Our' culture is a pretty arbitrary term.
I understand laws are laws but my question is how so many absurd and draconian laws and ordinances are introduced.
Soon anything and everything will be illegal.

"Negative" to what? You see more tits in South America and Europe, therefore it's not considered a private part? There are no restrictions there? Teachers can come to class topless?

 

[Marine Cpl]

It's the same interpretation of the law as was done by these cops.

Which is a BS interpretation. The thong covers the rear hole same as a skimpy bikini. Unless of course those are illegal as well and only granny panties are allowed.

 

[Darth]

Looking for even one tangible reason to ban this...

Going once...

 

[meketrefe]

Negative to obsolete and distorted perceptions and prejudices.
billions of people have evolved from that concept that women's breast is something to be covered and even to be ashamed of.
We cannot have equality w/o equality so buckle up and embrace this simple concept or don't. it is up to you.
I like to think that all humans have the same basic rights, no exceptions at all.

 

[Grimscale]

I didn't say no one. I said it's uncommon. Your claim that you see it all over is bullshit.

No, your claim that someone else didn't see something they saw is what is bullshit. You got a pocket video recorder on him? do you have E.S.P., that you can read his mind?
I've seen women in thongs and I don't even live that close to a beach.

Typical hypocrite. "I don't see it, so it isn't common." Followed by "You may have seen it, but it still isn't common."

Fact is it's legal, whether your prudish ways object to it or not. It's not nudity.

 

[Grimscale]

Correct.

In fact, I believe it is...

Actually, i believe it isn't, because it leaves the scrotum exposed. The scrotum is part of the male genitalia just like the labia is part of the female genitalia, so thus is considered nudity.
But... go ahead and prove me wrong. seeing a guy's wanker on a beach doesn't send me into a death spiral of despair and a fierce desire to suppress the rights of half the population.

 

[Mosinitis]

No, your claim that someone else didn't see something they saw is what is bullshit. You got a pocket video recorder on him? do you have E.S.P., that you can read his mind?
I've seen women in thongs and I don't even live that close to a beach.

Typical hypocrite. "I don't see it, so it isn't common." Followed by "You may have seen it, but it still isn't common."

Fact is it's legal, whether your prudish ways object to it or not. It's not nudity.

Once again you fucking ego gets in the way of logic. He implied it's common and worn on beaches everywhere. He was on all of the beaches? If I don't see it on several beaches I go to, it's not everywhere. Apparently women around here have better taste. It's not legal in South Carolina. Even the people who depend on tourist industry there warn it's illegal on their beaches.
One doesn't have to be nude to expose himself/herself. This is how SC law is written.
Go ahead, keep it coming. I love to pick on morons.

 

[Mosinitis]

Negative to obsolete and distorted perceptions and prejudices.
billions of people have evolved from that concept that women's breast is something to be covered and even to be ashamed of.
We cannot have equality w/o equality so buckle up and embrace this simple concept or don't. it is up to you.
I like to think that all humans have the same basic rights, no exceptions at all.

People shouldn't be ashamed of their natural body parts, but they should be ashamed of posting stupid straw-man arguments.

 

[Darth]

Actually, i believe it isn't, because it leaves the scrotum exposed. The scrotum is part of the male genitalia just like the labia is part of the female genitalia, so thus is considered nudity.
But... go ahead and prove me wrong. seeing a guy's wanker on a beach doesn't send me into a death spiral of despair and a fierce desire to suppress the rights of half the population.

Well if we are talking sexual organs, maybe that's why everyone's mouth needs to be covered as of late.

IYKWIM gentlemen.

 

[Grimscale]

Once again you fucking ego gets in the way of logic. He implied it's common and worn on beaches everywhere. He was on all of the beaches? If I don't see it on several beaches I go to, it's not everywhere.

And if people don't see it on several beaches it is not "uncommon". Who's the one with the "fucking ego"?
Your statement has nothing to do with logic and everything to do with emotion and a childish temper-tantrum. you are practically shouting "what I say goes" and ignoring any evidence to the contrary.

Apparently women around here have better taste. It's not legal in South Carolina. Even the people who depend on tourist industry there warn it's illegal on their beaches.

Citation please. Preferably a law stating that thongs are not permitted. Local beach rules are not law, BTW.
Oh, and it is your OPINION that it is "better taste". Personally I find a woman in a thong to be very tasteful. It's all in how she acts, not what she wears.

I've seen women in far more clothing act like a slut, and I've seen women with practically nothing on act very regal.

If you don't like it, don't look.

One doesn't have to be nude to expose himself/herself. This is how SC law is written.
Go ahead, keep it coming. I love to pick on morons.

Umm... exposing is the definition of nude. Without the nudity how it is exposing? Sounds awfully vague and unenforceable.
What is being "exposed" to make it illegal? Necks? Wrists? Ankles?

Go ahead, keep it coming. I love to pick on morons.

et tu, Brute?

 

[Elwood]

Once again you fucking ego gets in the way of logic. He implied it's common and worn on beaches everywhere. He was on all of the beaches? If I don't see it on several beaches I go to, it's not everywhere. Apparently women around here have better taste. It's not legal in South Carolina. Even the people who depend on tourist industry there warn it's illegal on their beaches.
One doesn't have to be nude to expose himself/herself. This is how SC law is written.
Go ahead, keep it coming. I love to pick on morons.

Just admit your a little jealous that she looks better in a thong than you

 

[Mosinitis]

Just admit your a little jealous that she looks better in a thong than you

Does she look better than me in my summer thong or my winter thong? I have two, I change every April and October.

 

[nortatoga]

And back to South Carolina (Cira 2009)

Myrtle Beach adjusts 'thong law' Tuesday

Myrtle Beach leaders have passed tougher indecent exposure law that now allows officers to issue tickets or make arrests the first time they see someone baring too much skin.

www.wmbfnews.com

MYRTLE BEACH, SC (WMBF) - Myrtle Beach leaders are one step closer to passing a tougher indecent exposure law that allows officers to issue tickets or make arrests the first time they see someone baring too much skin.
The City Council passed the first reading of the ordinance Tuesday. The previous so-called "thong ordinance" requires officers to issue a warning before issuing tickets.

 

[gun_slinger_boy]

Let's take a brief intermission and then get back to the discussion.

 

[E the massive]

And back to South Carolina (Cira 2009)

Myrtle Beach adjusts 'thong law' Tuesday

Myrtle Beach leaders have passed tougher indecent exposure law that now allows officers to issue tickets or make arrests the first time they see someone baring too much skin.

www.wmbfnews.com

MYRTLE BEACH, SC (WMBF) - Myrtle Beach leaders are one step closer to passing a tougher indecent exposure law that allows officers to issue tickets or make arrests the first time they see someone baring too much skin.
The City Council passed the first reading of the ordinance Tuesday. The previous so-called "thong ordinance" requires officers to issue a warning before issuing tickets.

Can you find the actual law? I did a brief search and did not find any law banning thongs in Myrtle Beach.

 

[Grimscale]

And back to South Carolina (Cira 2009)

Myrtle Beach adjusts 'thong law' Tuesday

Myrtle Beach leaders have passed tougher indecent exposure law that now allows officers to issue tickets or make arrests the first time they see someone baring too much skin.

www.wmbfnews.com

MYRTLE BEACH, SC (WMBF) - Myrtle Beach leaders are one step closer to passing a tougher indecent exposure law that allows officers to issue tickets or make arrests the first time they see someone baring too much skin.
The City Council passed the first reading of the ordinance Tuesday. The previous so-called "thong ordinance" requires officers to issue a warning before issuing tickets.

this whole statement implies there is not, at this time, a LAW in Myrtle Beach banning thongs.

Hmm... didn't someone tell me they were illegal in SC? Maybe I misheard that.


Ironic that New York would support more women's Rights than a "Southern State". After all, it was declared that women are allowed to bare their chests just like men do (unless a city makes a law against it themselves).
OMG, the HORROR!