Curmudgeon
.308 Win
Fool me once...
Now Trumps a sell out and bans bump stocks.
- Thread starter Saltwater60
- Start date
Fool me once...
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
The only thing the president pushed for 2a wise was theirs and red flag laws. He never really pushed for National ccw after his campaign. Now he’s backing down on the boarder wall and going to sign criminal justice reform. Seems like he’s switching sides to me.
S&W Fan
.475 A&M Magnum
They’re gonna have to cut off Jerry’s finger now
pjzwtl
.308 Win
You will get no argument from me there.
pjzwtl
.308 Win
Which I believe I addressed further down in my postAnd yet the president DEMANDED that the ATF reclassify bump stocks as machine guns...
“As for the DOJ I don’t want depts to be able to policy my rights regardless of who is in the White House”
Curmudgeon
.308 Win
Is FOPA like FUPA?
Were bump stocks banned by the Senate and the House with a law? Which has a better chance of being overturn in the Courts a Regulation banning or a passed Law banning?
I was explaining why he said what he said.
Let me guess 4D chess from trump huh? This was his plan the whole time
Here is a weird fucking idea. Follow me cause it's hard for people to grasp..
Alt. Universe, Trump is actually Pro 2A
And the house and Senate pass some bill banning bump stocks.
Trump, as PRESIDENT can veto it and tell them to fuck off.
But 498271^6 chess
They were going to get banned one way or another! Would you rather see a bill go to the Senate and hope Trump could Veto it and have it not get over-ridden ( It will for sure pass in the new House!)
So you just dont want to openly admit you are one of the "4d chess" guys huh?
So you think it would withstand a Veto Over-ride?
subsonic
.44 mag
I don't "care" about bump stocks either but I do care about a regulatory agency rewriting the law and banning a previously approved device without compensation. The question now is who is going to step up and sue the ATF?
The 'right' way to ban bump stocks, if it was, would be for Congress to pass a law and either grandfather in those in circulation, or if they decided to go the lovely route of confiscating private property, buying them back at fair pre-ban value. This is a regulatory taking and if it's not afoul of the 2nd amendment it's afoul of the 5th.
It takes very little imagination to extend this to a future administration coming for our Ruger 10/22s. Washington state voters declared them evil assault weapons in the last election and made them expensive and onerous to own, essentially creating a registry.
The 'right' way to ban bump stocks, if it was, would be for Congress to pass a law and either grandfather in those in circulation, or if they decided to go the lovely route of confiscating private property, buying them back at fair pre-ban value. This is a regulatory taking and if it's not afoul of the 2nd amendment it's afoul of the 5th.
It takes very little imagination to extend this to a future administration coming for our Ruger 10/22s. Washington state voters declared them evil assault weapons in the last election and made them expensive and onerous to own, essentially creating a registry.
There wouldn't be a veto, trump isn't pro 2A
So as I said they were going to be banned one way or another!
And the legal way would expose the RHINOS or even reopened the machine gun registry
And not open up the doors for the atf to rewrite laws and other shit that you apologist seem to overlook
Why the need for insults?
I quite sure we know who the Rhino's are!
Now the NFA of 68 was passed as a Law not an ATF Regulation.
National Firearms Act - Wikipedia
The NFA started in 1934
Reagan in 1986 with the advice of the NRA signed the Hughes amendment banning any new manufacturing and sales of "machine guns" to the civilian market, only allowing the transfers of already registered guns.
And as you pointed out '68 was passed as a law and not the ATF doing. And yet here we are watching the ATF rewrite a law to include bumpstocks and what's this they arent the legislative branch..
So no insults at all you are making excuses and validating Trump and the NRA complete disregard for not only the 2nd amendment but others as well
Regulations and Laws are to different things! And I'm not at all making excuses, Again these were going to be banned by a ATF regulation or a act of Congress! Regulation can be overturned much easier the a Law! Do I think it will happen NO! And as was asked before do you really think that Bump-stocks are protected under the 2A?
What proof do you have that Congress would have passed it?
And no they are now illegal BY LAW not regulation
And no they are now illegal BY LAW not regulation
So you are ok with magazine bans?
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
pjzwtl
.308 Win
Now what’s to stop the ATF to rule AR’s with a trigger pull less then 10 lbs are illegal to attempt to thwart the belt loop bump? Silly yes but possible.
After all we need to protect you from yourself.
After all we need to protect you from yourself.
And what proof do you have that Congress would not have?