Yeah, I like how you proved they are a joke. Nice touch.
Active Shooter Mandalay Bay
- Thread starter Darth
- Start date
Yeah, I like how you proved they are a joke. Nice touch.
freddy
.308 Win
Wow! Imagine if it actually happened like this....
...Too boring. This thread would be way too short.
2017 Las Vegas shooting - Wikipedia
On the night of October 1, 2017, a gunman opened fire on a large crowd of concertgoers at the Route 91 Harvest music festival on the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada, leaving 58 people dead and 489 injured. Between 10:05 and 10:15 p.m. PDT, 64-year-old Stephen Paddock ofMesquite, Nevada, fired hundreds of rifle rounds from his suite on the 32nd floor of the nearby Mandalay Bay hotel. About an hour after Paddock fired his last shot, he was found dead in his room from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. His motive is unknown. The incident is the deadliest mass shooting committed by an individual in the United States.
...Too boring. This thread would be way too short.
2017 Las Vegas shooting - Wikipedia
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Do you happen to know what a null hypothesis is? If you did you would know it's not my job to prove the video is a joke. It's the videos job to prove what it claims is fact. I find that hard to do considering they are just pulling things out of thin air. If anything the video proves the video is a joke.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
That's some terrible logic right there. The burden of proof is on you. The army uses flash to bang method to determine range also they're full of shot too?
It's based on the known speed of the bullet and the known speed of sound,vs various distances that they travel how is that bullshit?
It's based on the known speed of the bullet and the known speed of sound,vs various distances that they travel how is that bullshit?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
There are to many things that don't fit the narrative
Police story's have changed to much. To many unanswered questions
There should be almost no unanswered questions at this point
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
A simple mind is easily fooled to go along with that narrative. I bet you believed that the Sandy Hook Coroner pulled .223 bullets out of 6 year old children too.
freddy
.308 Win
Not even 2 weeks ago? It took the Warren Commision nearly a year. Warren Commission - Wikipedia
freddy
.308 Win
No, of course not! Those bullets were pulled out of alien reptiles from the planet Xenogoslia. Duh!
Last edited:
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Jokes are clever way to bury your head in the sand and try to look like you aren't burying your head in the sand.
freddy
.308 Win
freddy
.308 Win
Look! I posted clear irrefutable photographic proof! Anyone can see we have been invaded by alien reptiles! Do you really deny this obvious truth?!?! How else can you explain all these mysterious happenings? C'mon man, get with it!
freddy
.308 Win
Here is more! Don't bury your head in the sand!
freddy
.308 Win
You didn't really believe that Trump was HUMAN, did you?
freddy
.308 Win
You know I love you man. Even if we disagree at times.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
You'll be hearing from my attorney.
What did they pull out of thin air?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
The Warren commission? Man you are reaching, most homicides are solved very quickly, most withen days.
This case is a lot more complex than you seem to understand. Name one mass shooter who brought 20 guns and thousands of round of ammo to a shooting. This man thought through every step of the way right down to cameras in the hall. Even the police think he had help. This wasn't a mad man this was a statement.
Last edited:
Yet nobody can provide any. Weird.
freddy
.308 Win
Agreed! So maybe therefore it takes a little more time than you would like, no?
Magnus
6.5 Creedmoor
Those casinos are rigged with so many cameras, they shove complimentary ones in every rectum. There is no way it takes so long to get information on his days there. They have his hotel key so they know how many times and what times he went out. They know when he checked in. They know when he went to gamble. Not only that but police can't even get their story straight. Was it even them who responded or was it the clean up crew? What happened during that hour gap on the 31st floor?
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
They saw multiple people go in and out of that room before and after the shooting. They are still at large.
Magnus
6.5 Creedmoor
There's no way all those guns were for a one man team.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Actually no. The burden of proof is on anyone trying to prove that the events of that day didn't happen as they were reported. What you are saying is like telling someone that doesn't believe unicorns exist to prove that they don't. If you can't see the logical fallacy in that then there is no point talking to me about this anymore.
I totally agree with this!
Look I was there. This is what I saw on Freemont Street aka "old Vegas". If this isn't proof that the flashing on the fourth floor was this guy then I don't know what is. I mean what else could it have been!? If you're looking into a second gunman I would take a serious look at this guy. No one would ever suspect he would hide right out in the open. Prove me wrong about this. I'll send this video to the feds if necessary.
Phazer
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Sheriff Lombardo says he stands by new timeline of Las Vegas shooting
Before ending the news conference without taking questions from reporters, the agitated sheriff addressed criticism of his team’s investigation surfacing online.
“In the public space, the word ‘incompetence’ has been brought forward,” he said. “And I am absolutely offended with that characterization.”
“In the public space, the word ‘incompetence’ has been brought forward,” he said. “And I am absolutely offended with that characterization.”
Libtards are often (always?) offended. And most of what they say is rubbish. Ergo.......
Robin
.475 A&M Magnum
Yep, probably aliens.
Robin
Lol...Word of advice, don't believe what the Government tells you or reports to you what it was.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Actually no. The burden of proof is on anyone trying to prove that the events of that day didn't happen as they were reported.
That would be correct, so how is the science wrong again? Did the speed of sound change? does 556 fly faster in Las Vegas? Its not bullshit. Its a problem that needs to be looked at .
What you are saying is like telling someone that doesn't believe unicorns exist to prove that they don't. If you can't see the logical fallacy in that then there is no point talking to me about this anymore.
Absolutely not anything like that at all. Physics and science cannot be dismissed because you don't like where it its pointing to. Police use science all the time to solve crimes its admissible in every courtroom in the country. Now if the flash to bang or crack to bang varies, it would support the idea of a second shooter ( I cant say if there was one or not) But there is evidence supporting the idea. Not proof but evidence . Facts of case support the idea of a group being involved. Not necessarily shooting but somehow involved with the man.
This guy is a scientist, he explains the science of crack to bang used by the military .It is 100 percent based on Physics.
I cant tell you if he is accurate or not but his ideas make sense if his data is valid. Seriously, Put down the koolaid for a
minute , Take a red pill and listen to the video , then tell me where hes wrong Ok?
That would be correct, so how is the science wrong again? Did the speed of sound change? does 556 fly faster in Las Vegas? Its not bullshit. Its a problem that needs to be looked at .
What you are saying is like telling someone that doesn't believe unicorns exist to prove that they don't. If you can't see the logical fallacy in that then there is no point talking to me about this anymore.
Absolutely not anything like that at all. Physics and science cannot be dismissed because you don't like where it its pointing to. Police use science all the time to solve crimes its admissible in every courtroom in the country. Now if the flash to bang or crack to bang varies, it would support the idea of a second shooter ( I cant say if there was one or not) But there is evidence supporting the idea. Not proof but evidence . Facts of case support the idea of a group being involved. Not necessarily shooting but somehow involved with the man.
This guy is a scientist, he explains the science of crack to bang used by the military .It is 100 percent based on Physics.
I cant tell you if he is accurate or not but his ideas make sense if his data is valid. Seriously, Put down the koolaid for a
minute , Take a red pill and listen to the video , then tell me where hes wrong Ok?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Some of the facts of the case are:
Shooter has no known motive
Shooter bought and brought brand new weapons.
Shooter brought more weapons than he could use.
Shooter wore gloves
Shooter has no history of mental illness
Shooter was a very successful man,was a pilot and owned 2 airplanes
Number expended brass in the room doesn't match the volume of fire.
recordings of strings uninterrupted fire doesn't match the magazines he was using
Shooter fired for nine minutes before going silent
Shooter had unneeded sniper solutions, with no calculations written On a piece of paper to hit a target 1/4 mile wide.@400 yards, shooting solutions require time and experience to aquire, Inexperienced people would not know to use shooting solutions, experienced shooters know none was required to hit target. nor really used for those weapons with bump stocks
Shooter used high end scopes on a bump fire rifle.
receipt from hotel showing shooters name on it was for two people.
Police suspect he may have had help.
weapons were strewn about the whole hotel that did not make any sense, and Not near the windows where he did the shooting while magazines were neatly stacked .
A phone charger not belonging to him was found in his room (Later recanted by police)
Police claim security guard saved lives by distracting the shooter (later recanted by police)
Police say somebody used his hotel card key to enter his room several time while his car was gone.
Shooter had a car full of Tannerite that was not placed in his arc of of fire.
Shooter flew from Las Vegas to phoenix and rented a car and drove back returning car on Sept 28th
Police said he checked into hotel room and receipts prove he was there two days earlier.
After spending at least four days in the hotel Police will not release hotel surveillance video
Shooter does not fit profile of mass shooter
shooter has no known motive
Target was a heavily conservative group
None of the above is made up bullshit , and none of the above have any reasonable explanation at this point . It doesn't prove anything , but the sheer number of things that don't add up builds suspicion .
For instance, he brought an unreasonable amount of weapons and ammunition into his room which he likely did for several days based on the amount of weapons, his duration of stay , and record of him leaving and arriving at the hotel.
Some of the weapons had bump fire stocks and high end scopes. he also wore gloves . He also had a pilots license and two airplanes , he had worked for the government and defense contractors he supposedly won millions in the casino and had millions of dollars in the bank . casinos are the number one place to launder dirty money , claim it on your taxes and purchase real estate with it.
Now lets speculate for minute , How in the world does this not scream gun runner to you? Gloves to keep his prints off of weapons hes selling? airplanes to move them? millions of dollars of untraceable funds in the bank, connections to government contractors?stupid amount of weapons and ammo in the room, most brand new, a rental car from Phoenix to las vegas? How do you know this guy wasn't an undercover FBI agent ? or even CIA? VS hes was just a crazy dude, ?? How do you know he wasn't selling arms to ANTFA who openly said they are looking to arm themselves and use violence ?or any other group ?
How do you just ignore the possibility ?How do you know this guy wasn't a patsy or victim? Only a small amount of information has come out , and despite the facts listed above ,you have come to a conclusion that he absolutely acted alone and he was just a mentally ill person who snapped? He never showed any signs of mental illness to support that in the first place .
I cant draw any conclusions about the case. but given the facts that were released by the police I am suspicious .
I don't need need tin foil to question what Im told , just inconsistency in the story. Most of its common sense
Shooter has no known motive
Shooter bought and brought brand new weapons.
Shooter brought more weapons than he could use.
Shooter wore gloves
Shooter has no history of mental illness
Shooter was a very successful man,was a pilot and owned 2 airplanes
Number expended brass in the room doesn't match the volume of fire.
recordings of strings uninterrupted fire doesn't match the magazines he was using
Shooter fired for nine minutes before going silent
Shooter had unneeded sniper solutions, with no calculations written On a piece of paper to hit a target 1/4 mile wide.@400 yards, shooting solutions require time and experience to aquire, Inexperienced people would not know to use shooting solutions, experienced shooters know none was required to hit target. nor really used for those weapons with bump stocks
Shooter used high end scopes on a bump fire rifle.
receipt from hotel showing shooters name on it was for two people.
Police suspect he may have had help.
weapons were strewn about the whole hotel that did not make any sense, and Not near the windows where he did the shooting while magazines were neatly stacked .
A phone charger not belonging to him was found in his room (Later recanted by police)
Police claim security guard saved lives by distracting the shooter (later recanted by police)
Police say somebody used his hotel card key to enter his room several time while his car was gone.
Shooter had a car full of Tannerite that was not placed in his arc of of fire.
Shooter flew from Las Vegas to phoenix and rented a car and drove back returning car on Sept 28th
Police said he checked into hotel room and receipts prove he was there two days earlier.
After spending at least four days in the hotel Police will not release hotel surveillance video
Shooter does not fit profile of mass shooter
shooter has no known motive
Target was a heavily conservative group
None of the above is made up bullshit , and none of the above have any reasonable explanation at this point . It doesn't prove anything , but the sheer number of things that don't add up builds suspicion .
For instance, he brought an unreasonable amount of weapons and ammunition into his room which he likely did for several days based on the amount of weapons, his duration of stay , and record of him leaving and arriving at the hotel.
Some of the weapons had bump fire stocks and high end scopes. he also wore gloves . He also had a pilots license and two airplanes , he had worked for the government and defense contractors he supposedly won millions in the casino and had millions of dollars in the bank . casinos are the number one place to launder dirty money , claim it on your taxes and purchase real estate with it.
Now lets speculate for minute , How in the world does this not scream gun runner to you? Gloves to keep his prints off of weapons hes selling? airplanes to move them? millions of dollars of untraceable funds in the bank, connections to government contractors?stupid amount of weapons and ammo in the room, most brand new, a rental car from Phoenix to las vegas? How do you know this guy wasn't an undercover FBI agent ? or even CIA? VS hes was just a crazy dude, ?? How do you know he wasn't selling arms to ANTFA who openly said they are looking to arm themselves and use violence ?or any other group ?
How do you just ignore the possibility ?How do you know this guy wasn't a patsy or victim? Only a small amount of information has come out , and despite the facts listed above ,you have come to a conclusion that he absolutely acted alone and he was just a mentally ill person who snapped? He never showed any signs of mental illness to support that in the first place .
I cant draw any conclusions about the case. but given the facts that were released by the police I am suspicious .
I don't need need tin foil to question what Im told , just inconsistency in the story. Most of its common sense