I'm sure. I bet they drove the files right over to you.If you knew what I did for a living, your sphincter would have an ND.
I'm sure. I bet they drove the files right over to you.If you knew what I did for a living, your sphincter would have an ND.
A quick google search will tell you BH enter the wrong house pretty regularlyYep. Or don’t harbor crims. Either way.
Just curious how you came to the conclusion that my interpretation of case law is flawed. How do you know my education and background?
I am speaking from a position of authority and direct knowledge here. Not google searches and interpreting it how I think it reads. I heard it right from instructors and top lawyers mouths and was tested on it where I scored 100%.
Again you were not instructed and certified in this.
I’ll take my official state instruction and top lawyer instruction over what you think you read and understood in google.
Of course some think google U is a good instructor too.
Only you didn’t know that because you relied on google U to educate you.
Your google U supersedes my state education.
yea let me upload my personal information and certifications. Lol GTFO!
Not good. Was it the wrong house altogether like my grannies house or the right house and the crim just happen to not be there at that exact moment? Those are very different things.A quick google search will tell you BH enter the wrong house pretty regularly
Wow. Very out of touch. As stated, you are making the accusations of wrongdoing. Prove it in court. Let it play out. If they did wrong they should face the music. But on its face its not very reasonable to believe there was wrongdoing. You dont invite the cops to your crime scene. See Michael Brown. All the outrage and it was all proven to be fake. You are. the. ones. getting all excited. I'm letting it play out. Whatever is right is. right and thats what will happen.He knows because he is all knowing and no one could ever equal his intelligence and training. Just ask him, he'll be proud to tell you over and over and over and over again just how wonderful he is, and how you could NEVER hope to compete with his awesomeness. Anything you think you've accomplished is solely due to your "Google-fu" and is dismissed.
And don't take MY word for it (nor his, since he won't post proof):
He is also privy to information that even the authorities don't have as the the living arrangements of the accused, and can try and convict the family that was terrorized all by himself.
He also feels that bounty hunters can do no wrong, and that police don't just take their word for things. So if they are there, it absolutely MUST be legit and no errors could EVER be made by authorities, or even by non-authoritative civilians acting like authorities.
I agree with @spat , I'm half expecting a diatribe on droplets and how awesome it is to be a train cop.
Have you watched the video? Those cops seemed clueless on what is appropriate for BH. They didn’t even know where they were from. The cops were just there incase shit went south with a shootout. My dads a cop and he has had people call and say so and so stole my drugs can you recover them? So your statement isn’t true people do call the police when they commit a crime.The problem is you will be given jury instructions and these laws are not written for bounty hunters legally entering without a warrant to apprehend a wanted criminal (SC rulings). Otherwise it could also be charged anytime police enter on a warrant (remember no warrant needed for BH). Let it play out. If they did something wrong and it can be proven beyond all reasonable doubt in court, then yes they should face the music, but we are 100 steps away from any of that. All we have are speculations, news headlines, and google U interpretations of laws that we don't know the contextual history of and how they apply or do not apply in this situation. Let it be. It all will come out in the wash.
I will say however it does not look good for the theories floating around here that they called and involved the police beforehand. It's not like they got caught doing something after the fact. They announced their actions to police and even asked them to show up to back them up. This is not something criminals do. If they were there doing something they weren't allowed to do either by law or by SC rulings, then I cannot in good faith imagine they would have broadcast their crime to the police and then conspired with them to arrive and participate in said crime. Talk about a reach. It doesn't pass the reasonableness standard. We will see where it goes. My guess is nowhere.
Could still lead to one showing up at your home someday. That was my point. That’s all. Or a relative could list your address on their bail paperwork and they might show up. You never know and this is not acceptable unless they had proof and permission to enter. They had no right to point a gun at that man. What justification do they have for that?Not good. Was it the wrong house altogether like my grannies house or the right house and the crim just happen to not be there at that exact moment? Those are very different things.
This thread is nonsense at this point. I'm out.
The video is all you need. They entered the tenants house and forced their way into the first home. Both crimes. I’ll give you them forcing their way in may not be able to be proven in a court of law but I’d vote to convict. There’s no reason none at all for them to enter the tenants dwelling and that’s a crime unless the tenant gave permission but doesn’t seem that way.Because you can't possibly know the facts of this particular case or seen the relevant documents. Also before I chimed in here everyone was under the impression that they needed a warrant and were in violation of 4A. Those have been established to not be so.
Let it play out. The guys with the info - all of it, and knowledge of the laws - all of them, will handle this if the need is there. If the BH did something wrong they should be punished. We are a very long way from that being proven in a court of law beyond all reasonable doubt. Try to remain calm. You aren't helping the situation by getting yourself worked up.
I'm going to let it play out. There are many facts that we just don't know. Whatever is decided I am good with. It will all come out in the wash in the court room. It always does. In the meantime Im not going to get worked up over it because I'm smart enough to know what I don't know.Could still lead to one showing up at your home someday. That was my point. That’s all. Or a relative could list your address on their bail paperwork and they might show up. You never know and this is not acceptable unless they had proof and permission to enter. They had no right to point a gun at that man. What justification do they have for that?
The video only tells half the story. We don't have all the facts or laws. A google search of BH laws is all anyone here is going off of. That;'s a far cry from actual law and the relevance of it to this case. For all you know they have the proper documents for exactly what they did. It will work itself out.The video is all you need. They entered the tenants house and forced their way into the first home. Both crimes. I’ll give you them forcing their way in may not be able to be proven in a court of law but I’d vote to convict. There’s no reason none at all for them to enter the tenants dwelling and that’s a crime unless the tenant gave permission but doesn’t seem that way.
I'm going to let it play out. There are many facts that we just don't know. Whatever is decided I am good with. It will all come out in the wash in the court room. It always does. In the meantime I'm not going to get worked up over it because I'm smart enough to know what I don't know.
A swing and a miss!You are the only one "getting worked up". You are the only one that is looking foolish with your ridiculous statements and self worth.
No one else is claiming to be an expert and all knowing, only you.
You are the only one that continues to push your education, knowledge and experience without stating what this knowledge really is.
You went to Security guard/Peace officer school a few months ago and now, now you are the only one who knows anything.
We have cops on this forum, we have real, honest to gods Lawyers here. Some of them are in this discussion, but you know more because you went to guard school.
There are two lawyers that have been commenting on this situation and still you say that you know more than they do.
You are the only one getting worked up.
A swing and a miss!
Strike 3In what way, seriously dude, you are a joke and you are showing it constantly in this Thread.
You got all giddy over the BH's, almost gushing over them and their actions. You claim to be an expert. An expert because you sat in a class to be a security guard.
You buy more gear to pretend you are a cop, you speak of things that you clearly do not know. You continue to insult people here in this thread as well as other threads.
You have nothing at all to back up anything that you have stated. You keep talking about the Court ruling in regards to BH's. A case from the late 1800's. Good for you, looks like you did some half assed Google searching.
Again, you should just stop. You have gone down the hole of ignorance so bad, there is no pulling yourself out.
I'm the only one not getting all worked up and the only one saying to let the facts play out. Just because someone is a cop or lawyer doesn't mean they know anything about this specific case or circumstances. A divorce lawyer commenting on SC BH rulings carries no weight anymore than a Toyota mechanic can diagnose and fix the space shuttle. Let it play out. Nobody in here is in charge of this situation. Let it be.
Ok supercop.But you, a person that went through security guard school knows more about the law than people that do it for a living? Speaking of not knowing the case, you were so positive that everything was done correctly. Go back and re-read some of your insane posts.
A joke, your comments must be your attempt at being funny....
In what way, seriously dude, you are a joke and you are showing it constantly in this Thread.
You got all giddy over the BH's, almost gushing over them and their actions. You claim to be an expert. An expert because you sat in a class to be a security guard.
You buy more gear to pretend you are a cop, you speak of things that you clearly do not know. You continue to insult people here in this thread as well as other threads.
You have nothing at all to back up anything that you have stated. You keep talking about the Court ruling in regards to BH's. A case from the late 1800's. Good for you, looks like you did some half assed Google searching.
Again, you should just stop. You have gone down the hole of ignorance so bad, there is no pulling yourself out.
Strike 3
*Punch out*
Ok supercop.
Have a good one.
People that do stuff what would make others "shit their pants if they knew about it", well those people don't use things like this as their body armor
View attachment 106758
People who sit at banks. Or ride around in money trucks for $14 an hour, or sit outside of gated communities with their golf carts at the ready wear things like that
I dont need to let the facts play out. Under no circumstances were they allowed to do what they did especially enter the tenants house unless the tenant specifically gave them permission. The homeowner says no. Pretty funny how the bail bonds company and BPD have not really made a comment on what the BH did only what police did and no comment by BB company. I’m not surprised. Also how about the supervisor that came and said mistakes were made. I’d imagine he has more facts than either you or I do. All the facts you disregard.I'm the only one not getting all worked up and the only one saying to let the facts play out. Just because someone is a cop or lawyer doesn't mean they know anything about this specific case or circumstances. A divorce lawyer commenting on SC BH rulings carries no weight anymore than a Toyota mechanic can diagnose and fix the space shuttle. Let it play out. Nobody in here is in charge of this situation. Let it be.
Yep. I'll let it play out. Mistakes were made. Nice statement. Doesn't really mean anything though. When again is the DA reading the charges? I want to be sure I'm near the tv. Until then, we've got nothing other than emotions and opinions.I dont need to let the facts play out. Under no circumstances were they allowed to do what they did especially enter the tenants house unless the tenant specifically gave them permission. The homeowner says no. Pretty funny how the bail bonds company and BPD have not really made a comment on what the BH did only what police did and no comment by BB company. I’m not surprised. Also how about the supervisor that came and said mistakes were made. I’d imagine he has more facts than either you or I do. All the facts you disregard.