Read the laws and tell me where he fits into them. I already explained to you that neither of the 2 apply. He wasn’t committing a crime or intending to commit a crime and he wasn’t in a dwelling or conveyance.
He arrived and left in a conveyance.
Read the laws and tell me where he fits into them. I already explained to you that neither of the 2 apply. He wasn’t committing a crime or intending to commit a crime and he wasn’t in a dwelling or conveyance.
What? OMG. Irrelevant. It was his own car! Dude. You need help. He should get trespassed from his own car?He arrived and left in a conveyance.
Thanks for your opinion. And again, he was warned to leave. He wasn't charged with a crime. When he was told it was time to go, he got in his minivan and ran away, just like all of the fake tough guys do.You do not need to be a trial lawyer to read trespass laws. They are written in plain English. And human nature has nothing to do with law. He either committed a crime or he didn’t. Thank god that you aren’t a cop. You’d be just like the LT. Just the way that you argue here even after being proved wrong is evidence to that. Ego is a big problem with you. If you let ego get to you now, imagine if you had a badge.
What? OMG. Irrelevant. It was his own car! Dude. You need help. He should get trespassed from his own car?
You cannot get trespassed from a public place when no crime is committed. That’s like you being warned to leave a public area like a road for no reason when you have every legal right to be there.Thanks for your opinion. And again, he was warned to leave. He wasn't charged with a crime. When he was told it was time to go, he got in his minivan and ran away, just like all of the fake tough guys do.
Well he was, so yes you can.You cannot get trespassed from a public place when no crime is committed. That’s like you being warned to leave a public area like a road for no reason when you have every legal right to be there.
How about you post the definition in the actual law? Again. So what is he getting trespassed from? His own car or from underneath the bridge which isn’t a conveyance?con·vey·ance
/kənˈvāəns/
noun
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
- 1.the action or process of transporting someone or something from one place to another:"he was building vessels for the conveyance of live cod"synonymstransportation, transport, carriage, carrying, transfer, ... more
- 2.the legal process of transferring property from one owner to another:"protective measures that might be taken before the conveyance is concluded"synonymstransfer, transference, transferral, granting, ceding, ... more
That’s why the Game Warden told him to take them to court. It was illegal for them to do so. You are championing right’s violations.Well he was, so yes you can.
Your google search and 5 minutes of research does not make you the authority on Florida law. I'll go with the 10 or so cops on scene over your understanding of a paragraph you read somewhere online.That’s why the Game Warden told him to take them to court. It was illegal for them to do so. You are championing right’s violations.
I did read that. Quote the actual part in the law that applies to him. You have serious comprehension issues.I guess you missed this from a Criminal Defense Attorney in Florida!
Trespass in a Conveyance in Florida
In Florida, the crime of Trespass in a Conveyance is committed when a person willfully enters or remains in a conveyance without being authorized, licensed, or invited or refuses to exit after being asked by an owner to do so.www.richardhornsby.com
I did read that. Quote the actual part in the law that applies to him. You have serious comprehension issues.
And what conveyance was he in when he was fishing?Armed Trespass in a Conveyance
The crime of Armed Trespass in a Conveyance is a Third Degree Felony and is a Level 3 Offense under Florida’s Criminal Punishment Code.
A person is considered armed if they are in possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon when the trespass occurs.
If convicted of Armed Trespass in a Conveyance, a judge can impose any combination of the following penalties:
- Up to five (5) years in jail.
- Up to five (5) years of probation.
- Up to $5,000 in fines.
And what conveyance was he in when he was fishing?
OMG. So are you saying that he was getting trespassed from his own car? Is that what you are saying?How did he get there and how did he leave? The Game Warden was not his friend (Where is your car?) This douche set himself up plain and simple!! Thinking he was so smart!!
You don't have to be in a conveyance to be trespassing. This is a very similar situation and was upheld by Florida District Court AND the Eleventh Circuit Court Of Appeals. I guess you don't know as much as you think you do!And what conveyance was he in when he was fishing?
That’s private property. You guys really need to proofread what you post. Every post you guys make, make you look even more ignorant and uneducated.You don't have to be in a conveyance to be trespassing. This is a very similar situation and was upheld by Florida District Court AND the Eleventh Circuit Court Of Appeals. I guess you don't know as much as you think you do!
OFFICER SUED FOR ISSUING MAN TRESPASS WARNING AND TELLING HIM TO LEAVE PREMISES - LLRMI - Police Training and Expert Services for Law Enforcement, Jails & Corrections, Insurance Pools, Risk Managers, and Attorneys
On July 19, 2019, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided Watkins v. Miller[i], in which the court examined whether, in response to a 911 call regarding a man in a parking lot, an officer violated the Fourth or Fourteenth […]www.llrmi.com
So you would dishonor your oath and violate his rights because you didn’t like the level of submission he would have given you or the weapon he chose to open carry with?Just remember this...
I did not comment, positive or negative, about the officers.
I did not comment on rules, laws or rights that may or may not have been violated.
I only commented on the fact, as I see it, the Fisher guy acted and sounded like o douche bag.
If he were have dealt with me in the same manner, he would have had a bad day as well.
He started being a douche right from the start. He knew some citizens would call the police the way he was dressed. He knew the Police would have to show up. This was a planned thing in his mind. This is the biggest reason I claim him to be a douchebag!
That’s private property. You guys really need to proofread what you post. Every post you guys make, make you look even more ignorant and uneducated.
Why is that funny? That trespass case has nothing to do with the situation here? Was he on private property? Did someone on private property that owned the place tell him to leave?Now that's FUNNY THERE!!!
So you would dishonor your oath and violate his rights because you didn’t like the level of submission he would have given you or the weapon he chose to open carry with?
I guess it's you who cannot read.Why is that funny? That trespass case has nothing to do with the situation here? Was he on private property? Did someone on private property that owned the place tell him to leave?
Why is that funny? That trespass case has nothing to do with the situation here? Was he on private property? Did someone on private property that owned the place tell him to leave?
But why? Why would you fish for an offense? What did he do exactly that would have hurt your ego? The ID? The not wanting to turn the camera off? What was it exactly that would have put you on fishing mode to fuck with an American exercising his rights?Nope, I would not have charged him with the gun charges. Never have in all my working career baged someone with gun violations.
There would be other things that I would have charged him with. I could completely inspect his tackle Box and rods. I could written him for the broken twilight on the van, well his girlfriend would have gotten the ticket.
As soon as he decided to argue about the tresspass, he would have been taken to jail for refusing to obey the tresspass.
Many ways around things, it is all in the articulation.
Again, this occurred because he, the DB, wanted it to occur
Explain please.You truly have no concept of the laws or court decisions. You believe that you do, but you are clueless.
It was private property owned by the store. What don’t you understand about that? How does that have any relevance to a public fishing area?I guess it's you who cannot read.
"Lastly, Watkins’ argument that officer was not the “owner or authorized person” to issue a criminal trespass warning was also without merit because this was not a “structure or conveyance,” the only two places with that requirement."
It’s a county park. You cannot be trespassed from a public area if no crime is committed.11:30 of your video!!
Because it proves that the police can trespass you without being owners of the property.It was private property owned by the store. What don’t you understand about that? How does that have any relevance to a public fishing area?