Nevar
.357 mag
Hey [censored] tell us your SS number them maybe we will warm up . . Nothing like a princess adnie foot licker.
I don’t know how much land is required to sustain an average sized family. That’s irrelevant. Whatever the acreage is, is what is. The point is to be away from others that need what you have so that you do not have to fight them.
A couple of boxes of 300 ACDC blackout / watchout.What's the megaton yield to round conversion?
Let me make this simple. If you have 4 years of food for a family of 4 stashed away, where are your chances better? In the woods or in a suburb?So how does one get away when many people, in an attempt to get away, go to the same places you go?
The problem is that there is not enough land for everyone to be away from others.
hiding permanently doesn't work. Homesteading doesn't work if everyone wants it.
That is why groups, villages, farming and commerce became so popular.
Even homesteading today is so expensive that requires at least one person to have a seasonal job with
a few exceptions like very large family farms.
Once you farm you don't get away from anything. It is quite a job at a permanent location.
As far as living form the land land it is required very few if you homestead with the exception of wood that requires 10 acres of diverse forest long term. Latest homesteading acts like the one in Alaska in 1988 produced over 3K homesteads wiht an average of over 100 acres each and very hard living for many. That is w/o taking into account the rights to fishing and game that is runinng short like restrictions on salmon even the natives face.
So living off the land might be great as a concept but it cannot literally sustain humanity. We are too many.
Let me make this simple. If you have 4 years of food for a family of 4 stashed away, where are your chances better? In the woods or in a suburb?
Hard to say. It depends of so many other factors.Let me make this simple. If you have 4 years of food for a family of 4 stashed away, where are your chances better? In the woods or in a suburb?
Bottom line, if you can find a remote area away from others, your food stock will last longer. Here’s an example.Hard to say. It depends of so many other factors.
In the remote woods so many people just vanish and nobody ever knows how.
The Amish are huge on community and cooperation, They don't build barns alone. Just saying.You want to self rely and survive for a long time? ...start thinking Amish.
Yes, if you have a second home or family you could spread your preps with. This is one way to do it. The way animals will stash food in different locations for the winter. Even so, you'd still face the possibility of having to abandon those locations and your stashes along with them.Have all of your preps in different locations. Maybe, some at home. Some at your country property. And, maybe some in between at one of those storage areas. Monthly charges are fairly low for the small storage spaces, so I hear...
They do not take expensive insurance neither. Their insurance is their community.The Amish are huge on community and cooperation, They don't build barns alone. Just saying.
I keep 2 boxes of thirty aught six for my single shot rifle that CNN tells me is all I need for hutnin'.
Sounds like an arsenal to me. Why do you need 40 rounds for a single shot?Why so much? Are you that bad of a hunter? You need forty rounds??
4 years of food is useless no matter where you live.Let me make this simple. If you have 4 years of food for a family of 4 stashed away, where are your chances better? In the woods or in a suburb?
Which reinforces my point. What better place to secure additional sources of food then in the wild compared to a suburb? At least in the wild you can procure grubs and other stuff to supplement what you don’t have if you area not successful in hunting.4 years of food is useless no matter where you live.
If you can’t secure a new source of food in a year or 2, more years won't help.
Sounds like an arsenal to me. Why do you need 40 rounds for a single shot?
I think we can all agree, in any sort of SHTF scenario less urban and more rural is almost always better.Which reinforces my point. What better place to secure additional sources of food then in the wild compared to a suburb? At least in the wild you can procure grubs and other stuff to supplement what you don’t have if you area not successful in hunting.
Let me make this simple. If you have 4 years of food for a family of 4 stashed away, where are your chances better? In the woods or in a suburb?
When civilization breaks down, you need to be thinking about what's going to replace it, not how to get away.In a SHTF scenario, ammo, like gas, food, water... Becomes a commodity! If I had stockpiles, I wouldn't be selling for profit because money becomes less meaningful than nourishment or survival. I'd be holding onto all I have at the moment and accumulating what I can, when I can.
Am I prepping for doomsday? No, not at all... But for a sustained holdout for the SHTF to blow over, yeah sure! Because if doomsday comes, they'll be no hope, just survival! Would suck to be facing an enemy and reaching for that last full mag, while looking at the cases of ammo laying there in the corner useless as shit! Just saying, lol... So in your stockpiling, magazines is an often overlooked commodity for your firearms, don't skimp out!
That's all I'm sayin lol
And you've stored 4 years of water too? How about sewage ability to handle 4 years? No matter what you think, they odds are probably all about the same. The thing(s) the woods will isolate you from as an advantage, will also be a disadvantage at some point. Are you trained in First Aid? How about advanced First Aid? Have some drugs on hand as well for any eventuality? Again, SHTF scenarios are fun to talk about, but the general rule is once it happens, all plans fall to shit!!! There'll be 1000 things that happen that you didn't foresee or plan for.
Well, as I stated earlier I have more than enough ammo for any practical purpose but not near enough for recreation. I would like to have years supply of recreational ammo stocked so I can comfortably ride out these panics. When availability comes back I'd like to stack a couple thousand 55gr HP match 5.56 ammo, that being my favorite range load, and whatever couple thousand of 9mm.Yeah stockpiling ammo is great if you have a bunker and plan on bugging in, but how about if you have to up and leave? Ammo is very heavy and you can only pack so much in your vehicle (assuming driving is still an option) and you are definitely limited if you are on foot. There is nothing wrong with stocking up and putting yourself in the best position you think possible, but at the same time, there is no way to tell what, if anything, will happen. You have to be OK with the idea that dispite all the effort and money put into to stocking up, you may have to leave it all in order to survive. The same goes for buying up guns. You can only use/carry so many. It's one thing to want to buy enough to arm your family and close friends, but as far as getting this gun or that and accumulating a collection, you can't use them all at one time and likely could not realistically take them all with you if you had to go.