Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Yes. Who doesn’t? What do you think it’s for?
Kay Jewelers fires manager for turning deputy away over service weapon
- Thread starter Arjuna
- Start date
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
As a Right!!
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
For what purpose?
I would say thats exactly what was intended.
Jefferson on the right to change one’s government (1776) - Online Library of Liberty
it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.****
Jefferson on the right to change one’s government (1776) - Online Library of Liberty
it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.****
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
So then you think that you can't be charged with Treason?
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I have no words.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
By a tyrannical gov thst needs to be overthrown you can be. Even if it’s a bs charge. Hence the reason for the 2a. What else is it for?
nortatoga
.338 Win Mag
It is the ability too! Not the Right too! Big difference! You fail you don't get to say the 2A gave me the Right and now I can go home.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I think you need to read the Declaration of Independence. It may clear up any confusion, misinformation, or perhaps incorrect history lessons you were taught on the purpose of the 2nd Amendment. It may not be entirely your fault. It could be your teacher’s fault for misinforming you.
spat
.700 Nitro Express
The 2A doesn't say you can overthrow the government.
It *does* say you can have *the means* to overthrow the government.
Just like it says you can carry a gun, but doesn't say you can fire it wherever you want.
Shadow2
6.5 Creedmoor
Treason has a very specific definition, did anybody care to look it up? Its in support of an enemy,We the people are not the enemy.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
From a cop buying some bling to overthrowing the government. Welcome to nygunforum!
spat
.700 Nitro Express
The Declaration of Independence says you not only have a right to overthrow the government in certain circumstances, but a duty to do so.
But, and here's the kicker, while you have a right to successfully overthrow the government in those circumstances, you do not have a right to try and fail.
If you try and fail, the founding fathers fully expected you to be executed for the attempt.
What this boils down to is that a successful insurrection can establish a legitimate government (a concept the nobility of Europe at the time would have rejected, they still believed the right to rule was basically hereditary).
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum