libertysnake
.338 Win Mag
In the interest of posting more gun related threads, I'll post about how I'm going about deciding on my first pistol, like @Prudii !
I went to the range yesterday and fondled some. I ended up renting two that felt good in my hand, the Beretta 92 (A1) and the Sig P226 (E2 grip). I'm leaning toward heavier, full size pistols since I won't be carrying it, and I'm thinking the extra weight will give better stability and recoil control when target shooting.
Here's my synopsis of what I thought of each that I shot and handled.
Shot:
Beretta 92A1 -Wow I was surprised I liked this as much as I did. I originally thought it would be too large for me. I found it to be well balanced and a smooth shooter. Recoil was very smooth. Double action was frickin' heavy! But the single action was very nice. I couldn't really reach the slide release with my primary hand. I was hitting it fine with my support hand, but I'd buy a lever extension if I went with this pistol.
Sig P226 (E2 grip) - nice gun, fits your hand well. The muzzle seemed to flip a little more than the Beretta, probably due to the higher bore axis. It had the smoothest double action I tried. But IIRC, I thought the single action wasn't as crisp as the Beretta. I had a problem shooting this one. I found that the trigger travels really far back before firing, this causes me to start hooking my finger to push it all the way and the pad of my finger gets pinched between the trigger back and frame, ouch. I'm thinking this wouldn't happen with the old style grips.
Ones I only handled:
CZ 75B: I really wanted to like this gun, but it just doesn't fit me great. I was barely reaching the trigger in DA, and I felt like I couldn't get a good support hand grip on the frame, I think because of the curved trigger guard.
Sig P320: the 5" felt unbalanced, but I liked the 4" (carry?) model. Might have to come back to that one.
H&K VP9: was very comfortable. It was the only one with an "on-trigger" safety that felt I would reliably actuate every time.
Walther PPQ and PPX: these were nice and comfortable, and I really liked the PPQ trigger but I didn't like the on-trigger safety. I have slimmer fingers and feel I could fail to actuate it on this and some other pistols. I really want to try the P99 though.
FN FNX: I liked the feel of this one. It seemed very light, but also well balanced. Trigger was nice enough, I can't remember specifics about how the trigger felt.
Glock 19: I liked the balance, it felt like it had a low CoG. But it didn't fill my palm very well. The grip angle didn't seem crazy or anything, but I think it caused the grip to not settle in my hand well. I felt some of the single stack ones, and they felt comfortable.
List of ones I still need to handle:
CZ P01, P07, P09?, SP01?, P10
Sig Pxxx gen 1 grip, P220?, SP2022
HK USP, P30, 45, P2000?,
Walther P99
Beretta PX4, APX, 92c?
Browning Hi Power
IMI Jericho 941
FN FNX again, FNS
S&W M&P, revolvers
Kahr anything
Steyr anything
Ok, what do you guys think? Got any two cents for me? How goes your search @Prudii ?
I have both a S&W M&P Shield in 9MM, and a Glock 43. I prefer the glock 43. Both are reliable, both are great to fire, but the Glock 43 is actually supported by Glock. You can get replacement barrels no problem from them, and at a reasonable price, along with anything else you'd want. Their warranty is solid as well, and you don't have to worry about voiding it by changing sights or dumb things like that. S&W is very strict on their warranties, and you can easily void it / replacement parts are harder to come by.
The Glock43 is also damn small and conceals super easy -- which, if you're looking to carry the pistol, is always a feature you're looking for.
Just my two cents.