Since there is absolutely no evidence even conceivable that could disprove it, then he is not guilty.
That's how justice works. He doesn't have to prove it. They have to disprove it.
This isn't in dispute.Do presidents have 'the ability to declassify anything'?
The blockbuster article in The Washington Post saying President Donald Trump had "revealed highly classified informationwww.politifact.com
I guess you were in the room also!!!This isn't in dispute.
Except he isn't potus anymore and absent proof he actually declassified anything it's just him lying again. In any case, the records do not belong to him.
Don't for a second think that the FBI put itself on the line here because it was too lazy to read a couple of wiki articles on popular legislation.
I guess a single chat with Patel and all of this misunderstanding could have been cleared up.I guess you were in the room also!!!
FBI Affidavit Acknowledges Breitbart News Article with Trump's Defense
The FBI special agent who sought a search warrant of Trump's home in Mar-a-Lago cited a Breitbart News article in his affidavit.www.breitbart.com
“The White House counsel failed to generate the paperwork to change the classification markings, but that doesn’t mean the information wasn’t declassified,” Patel told Breitbart News. “I was there with President Trump when he said, ‘We are declassifying this information.’”
Patel told Breitbart News that the material was information that Trump “felt spoke to matters regarding everything from Russiagate to the Ukraine impeachment fiasco to major national security matters of great public importance — anything the president felt the American people had a right to know is in there and more.”
Patel is also a former prosecutor, former public defender, former principal deputy to the acting director of national intelligence, former National Security Council aide, and former top House Intelligence Committee staffer who would be well-versed in classification matters.
The FBI special agent wrote in the affidavit:
You could have left it at that. Keep cucking.I may not know all of the facts
Dude, you lost all of your credibility in the covid thread.You could have left it at that. Keep cucking.
I'll never understand how TDS can get people to take a story in the ny times based on leaks from a corrupt agency at face value. It's almost as if hate overwhelms critical thinking ability.I'll never understand why so many grown men are on their knees defending a guy who couldn't give a shit about them.
He was given emphatic, multiple warnings about the repercussions of his impropriety. He is too stupid, or stubborn, or both to have heeded them. Don't you dare cry for trump. He brought this upon himself; volunteering, when you don't even know the substantive details of this case, to fight for him is true cuck behavior.
Inside the 20-month fight to get Trump to return Presidential material
The National Archives and the Justice Department tried and failed repeatedly for more than a year and a half to retrieve classified and sensitive documents from former President Donald Trump. Here's how the events unfolded.indianexpress.com
Late 2021
Archives officials warn of consequences.
Officials at the archives warn Trump’s representatives that there could be a referral to the Justice Department or an alert to Congress if the former president continues to refuse to comply with the Presidential Records Act.
Guess that means the next president can waive all of Biden, Obama, and Clinton's privilege ?This is from the above post interesting ...
a major impediment to the FBI’s legal ability to search a former president’s home: Presidential privilege. The privilege completely protects a former President’s confidential records and communications. It was a thorny problem.
But don’t worry! Joe and his lawyers found a loophole: Joe, acting as the CURRENT President, conveniently waived aside the Presidential privilege FOR TRUMP, on the theory that the acting President holds the right to waive or preserve the privilege, no matter which President first asserted it.
Is the waiver legal? Who knows. Who cares! It’s never been done before
Honey, I've been doing this a lot longer than you have. Feel better, okay?Dude, you lost all of your credibility in the covid thread.
You were wrong about everything then. LOL
And you're wrong about everything now.
By the way, you're projecting again.
You're almost there...hate for an entire [slightly more than] half of the country is so pervasive in a certain subset of indoctrinated people that they will abdicate all sense of reason and go deep-throat on whatever a proven liar has concocted for them to believe in.It's almost as if hate overwhelms critical thinking ability.
just because you have been doing it longer doesn’t mean you have been doing it right, but this off topic lovers quarrel you and @Bigfoot are having needs to be taken to pm or you can just agree to disagree without the sidemouthing.Honey, I've been doing this a lot longer than you have. Feel better, okay?
The right is not the group foaming at the mouth about Trump being the antichrist.You're almost there...hate for an entire [slightly more than] half of the country is so pervasive in a certain subset of indoctrinated people that they will abdicate all sense of reason and go deep-throat on whatever a proven liar has concocted for them to believe in.
Clearly you're talking about hillary clinton. She's the only one that derided the half of the country that didn't support her. Lol, do you not see your projection?You're almost there...hate for an entire [slightly more than] half of the country is so pervasive in a certain subset of indoctrinated people that they will abdicate all sense of reason and go deep-throat on whatever a proven liar has concocted for them to believe in.