Acer-m14
20×102mm Vulcan
S.W.A.T. stands for: "Sit. Watch. & Act Tough."
Maybe It is just me but, has anyone heard any media outlet even mention that maybe there is a connection between these teen terrorists and the video games they are playing? I have nothing against the first person shooter games but for a kid in his early formative years with other outstanding issues (family life sucks, bullied at school, etc.) to be subjected to this kind of non-stop violence, it has to have an affect on his mindset. If nothing else it could put ideas in his head and would have a desensitizing affect on his perception of the consequences of his actions.
No, you're right, only doctors are qualified to comment on non-medical, sociological issues.Thanks, doctor.
Disappointed, yes. Angry... hold off on that.I hope I'm wrong. I want to believe that these accounts are throwing me off and warping my opinions and that they're false. I want to find out that these were taken out of context. I pray it's not genuine. Sadly I'm prepared to be thoroughly disappointed and angry.
Joe Biden Suggests Americans Owning AR-15s Are 'Sick' People Who Want to 'Kill Someone'
President Joe Biden suggested Thursday that Americans were purchasing guns like AR-15s for the sake of killing people.www.breitbart.com
While we're at it Joe, fuck you too.
And then blame gun owners when a preventable mass murder happens.and then call someone with a gun if there's an emergency.
This. Along with the fact that has already been pointed out previously that most of these scumbags will commit suicide once confronted.Here's the thing that bothers me most about a DELAY...
One thing that War has taught us, is that the sooner we can get those who are wounded, to medical care, the better the chance they have at surviving!
So waiting, aside from confronting and eliminating the threat, may very well have CONTRIBUTED to the deaths that occured!!!
Yeah, read that again...
Because we know applying pressure to a wound can help tremendously. We know that an major bleed, clamped can save a life, maybe lose a limb, but still, preserve life!
Delay... Delay has absolutely NO advantage in an active shooter situation. And I'm curious on who wrote what policy or operation manual that would prescribe a delay...
If a squad car came upon gangbangers shooting up the neighborhood, would the responders sit and wait until they were done? Maybe hoping they ran out of ammo? I'm so confused...
Which religion?
The one that says it is ok to diddle little kids?
The one that says it is ok to murder those who do not believe as you do?
Or is it the one that thinks it is ok to torture and enslave those of other religions?
Religion is a man-made concept, fraught with the same corruption as our political structures. Most religions appear to be more about gaining followers so as to gain power and money, not to "save their souls".
You want to see what kind of religious people are pushing for America to become a theocratic nation, just go on over to Gab. You can read for yourself the comments, by it's creator, on how they need to convert everyone to Christianity at sword-point.
Sorry, but that kind of fanatical religious fervor is unacceptable.
Yes the cops are useless and have no duty to protect, but this AGAIN takes the blame away from the only place it lies.
Places the blame does not lay:
Violent video games
The NRA
The gun manufacturer
Social media
God /lack thereof in school
The gun
The president
Immigration policies
Background checks
Etc.
It's laughable how fast people take blame away from the actual responsible party in every one of these fiascos and then they say "OMG, why did it again!? :O"
Police don't have a duty to protect. Was determined by the courts a while back.
In 2005, Jessica Gonzales sued Castle Rock, Colorado police for failing to arrest her husband, who had violated a protective order, resulting in the murder of her three children. Her case went to the U.S. Supreme Court in The Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, where she lost because even though the order required arresting her husband upon violation, then-Justice Antonin Scalia successfully argued that “a well-established tradition of police discretion has long coexisted with apparently mandatory arrest statutes.”This case builds upon Supreme Court precedent in Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1989). In that case, a young boy was repeatedly abused at the hands of his father, something that county Social Services was aware of, but made no effort to remove the child. His mother sued once the four-year old entered a vegetative state, and the Court ruled that that the state did not have a special obligation to protect a citizen against harms it did not create.Based on these precedents, Lozito was told in the New York City case that “no direct promises of protection were made” to him, and therefore he could not sue the police for failing to come to his aid. In other words, the police do not have to act if someone is actively being harmed, they do not have to arrest someone who has violated orders, and they do not have any obligation to protect you from others.
Police Have No Duty to Protect the Public
Though often unsaid in police reform debates, numerous court precedents have established that cops aren’t obligated to act in the interests of citizens.prospect.org
The cops would have had to fight me off -- as in, shoot me -- to keep me from going inside. No way I would stand outside my kid's school listening to shots blasting. I'm not disparaging the guy who lost a child, but if the cops are just going to mass around and wait for backup, then they're just in the way.
Then those who think like that are in the wrong professionTexas Department of Public Safety official on why police waited before engaging the gunman in Uvalde, TX
Texas Department of Public Safety official on why police waited before engaging the gunman in Uvalde, TXrumble.comTexas Department of Public Safety official on why police waited before engaging the gunman in Uvalde, TX
The Post Millennial Clips
Texas Dept of Public Safety (DPS) Official Lt. Chris Olivarez was asked why law enforcement retreated and waited an hour before reengaging the Uvalde elementary school shooter. In his response to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, after an initial few minutes of obfuscation, eventually Lt. Olivarez explains the responding officers could have been shot, if they immediately rushed the gunman.
I mistakenly thought the main lesson from the investigation of the Broward County, Florida, Parkland school shooting was never to wait. Unfortunately, it looks like Parkland and Uvalde will have a lot in common.
Texas DPS Lt. Chris Olivarez Explains Law Enforcement Waited One Hour to Enter Uvalde School Because They Were Afraid of Being Shot
Texas DPS Lt. Chris Olivarez Explains Law Enforcement Waited One Hour to Enter Uvalde School Because They Were Afraid of Being Shot - The Last Refuge
Texas Dept of Public Safety (DPS) Official Lt. Chris Olivarez was asked why law enforcement retreated and waited an hour before reengaging the Uvalde elementary school shooter. In his response to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, after an initial few minutes of obfuscation, eventually Lt. Olivarez explains...theconservativetreehouse.com
NiceThe "won't somebody think of the children" of my day was Postal 2.
One of the few games I know of where you can use a live cat as an AR suppressor to eviscerate an army of rabid Gary Colemans as you pee on their dismembered corpses.
Now reporting gunman was in the school for over an hour before being engaged.
There's going to be a lot of explaining to do here.
But you don't need a gun, the police will protect you....Texas Department of Public Safety official on why police waited before engaging the gunman in Uvalde, TX
Texas Department of Public Safety official on why police waited before engaging the gunman in Uvalde, TXrumble.comTexas Department of Public Safety official on why police waited before engaging the gunman in Uvalde, TX
The Post Millennial Clips
Texas Dept of Public Safety (DPS) Official Lt. Chris Olivarez was asked why law enforcement retreated and waited an hour before reengaging the Uvalde elementary school shooter. In his response to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, after an initial few minutes of obfuscation, eventually Lt. Olivarez explains the responding officers could have been shot, if they immediately rushed the gunman.
I mistakenly thought the main lesson from the investigation of the Broward County, Florida, Parkland school shooting was never to wait. Unfortunately, it looks like Parkland and Uvalde will have a lot in common.
Texas DPS Lt. Chris Olivarez Explains Law Enforcement Waited One Hour to Enter Uvalde School Because They Were Afraid of Being Shot
Texas DPS Lt. Chris Olivarez Explains Law Enforcement Waited One Hour to Enter Uvalde School Because They Were Afraid of Being Shot - The Last Refuge
Texas Dept of Public Safety (DPS) Official Lt. Chris Olivarez was asked why law enforcement retreated and waited an hour before reengaging the Uvalde elementary school shooter. In his response to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, after an initial few minutes of obfuscation, eventually Lt. Olivarez explains...theconservativetreehouse.com
"How easy it is". They purchased it under the same rules that anyone else would.... including the background check. They didn't sit in their underwear drinking double decaf latte's and have it UPS's to their door. They followed the same rules as everyone else.
We ordered the same gun used in Uvalde. Here’s how easy it was.
Five clicks is all it took to order a semi-automatic rifle like the one used in the Uvalde school shooting.qz.com
What happened to the shoot out report with Border Patrol that happened first?
Just bs?