Thorsden meets Kel-tec..FUAC compliant AR
- Thread starter redtail
- Start date
Twogunwilly
6.5 Creedmoor
Looks heavy
BDinPutnam
.475 A&M Magnum
Looks like a friggin' cricket bat.
Eddie Gunks
.338 Win Mag
Ha ha ha. That was their intention the 1st time. Back then they knew it would not work.
It will work next time.
Last edited:
Uzi
.308 Win
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Meh...It looks as though the grip is a permanent part of the receiver (which I understand the reasoning) but it'd be nice to be able to put a pistol grip on it if you were to get out of NY. I fear that @Eddie Gunks and @BuffNiag are right though.
Cobalt Kinetics? That's a $3,000 AR then.
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
IMO that is a thumb hole stock just like the latest thordsen. Yes I know it has a paper thin slit. It looks and functions like a thumb hole.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I am sure it shoots the same or better than any other.
Even for people with large hands / fingers might be more adequate than standard pistol grips where the length to the trigger is too short
w/o some sort of customization anyway.
They should install a barrel though.
Even for people with large hands / fingers might be more adequate than standard pistol grips where the length to the trigger is too short
w/o some sort of customization anyway.
They should install a barrel though.
ManrisFrack
6.5 Creedmoor
Don't mean to insult but if you aren't absolutely certain of this, you haven't been paying attention. They've been openly laying the ground work and attempting to sway public opinion in this direction since, at least, Parkland. Demand all semi-autos, 'compromise' for detachable mag semi-autos.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
I know they are coming after semi autos @ManrisFrack, that's why I wrote what I wrote. Washington state has already basically done it and I think so much of what comes next, depends on how the challenges against that law go. But the Heller decision should also come into effect as semi auto's with detachable mags are very much in common use. So any ban would have to end up infront of the Supreme Court. I know, I know AWB's haven't yet and that's bull shit but a ban on all semi auto's even with a detachable mag compromise, would be too far reaching.
ManrisFrack
6.5 Creedmoor
Your original wording, and that of BuffNiag, left me thinking you weren't totally convinced of the left's intentions. I think a lot of our problems are the result of giving them the benefit of the doubt and thinking that they won't/can't push our society so far from freedom that our children will have no true concept of it.
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Believe me. I am totally convinced of what the left's intentions are.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Yes disarm the population and sell the country. ...well, actually... give it away.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I think you place too much stock in our Justice system I'm afraid.
And you are wrong
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Sorry, I missed the link from the state indicating that this was GTG. Can you provide the relevant court case or indication from NY state police/AG that this is good, like they did with the second gen thordsen?
https://www.thordsencustoms.com/media/wysiwyg/IF_YOUR_STATE_IS.pdf
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Look here, we got nunchucks back, lol.
Looks like a planet of the apes(org) rifle.
Curmudgeon
.308 Win
I'd pay more for the crappy pallet it was photographed on.
Robin
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Hell, I don't think it looks bad at all! Good ape hunter!
Robin
Robin
fartgamer
.223 Rem
Not as ugly as most, not bad, imo.
If you think that's a thumbhole stock then you don't even know what a stock is...
Duke
.357 mag
I'll stick with the SCR....
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
The lady doth protest too much.
Is this a thumbhole stock?
And when you say yes, as you must, do you really believe anybody buys that a 1/4” cut made lengthwise suddenly makes it not one?
Yoir blithe comment is undermined by the fact the very manufacturer of these products has put considerable effort into having the government confirm they do not run afoul of any laws (as yet no conclusion on the gen 3).
Attachments
The stock in the OP is splitting a very thin hair.
But again, UNSAFE act was never intended to make any cohesive sense.
But again, UNSAFE act was never intended to make any cohesive sense.
For the record I do think it looks cool.
E the massive
.308 Win
It's not a cut. The stock is two pieces.
Blimey
.450/400 Nitro Ex
So if the stock is made as two separate pieces there is a legal difference between that and if it is molded as one and then cut? Rhetorical question; there is nothing in any law that says that makes a difference.
I also challenge anybody here to identify in any state law exactly what a thumbhole stock is (e.g hole size, what percent of the hole perimiter must be removed to keep it from being a thumbhole, etc.) and how 1) this doesn’t meet that definition and 2) Precisely what precludes it meeting that definition.
Lots of guessing and hoping. What if the gap was 1/32”? Still GTG? What if while shouldered the weight of the gun actually causes the buffer tube to gently touch the stock? Thumbhole now after all?