Depick
.308 Win
Judge Suddaby is putting in OT on this one folks.
Will the CCIA be Enjoined this Week? Case dismissed
- Thread starter maverick52
- Start date
Phazer
.338 Win Mag
Booking plane tickets out of town to avoid a decision?
Celt
.338 Win Mag
The new laws are clearly a blatant FU to SCOTUS. I want to see politicians prosecuted then hanged for this.
Last edited:
drowhawk
.44 mag
Nothing. Not a word. I feel bad for those that actually thought an injuction would be granted.
"I hate to say a-toad-a-so but I fu***ng a-toad-a-so."
maverick52
.223 Rem
I’m holding out hope, but I’m starting to think the same.
Saltwater60
.950 JDJ
It could happen.
Depick
.308 Win
I’m going to stay hopeful and say finalizing his order.
Weird it's not September 1st yet...
Calm the fuck down.. 11:59pm tonight yea go ahead start freaking out..
Until then chill... also it's not like even of the injunction doesn't happen, that doesn't mean the judge ruled in favor of NY in the case.. we are literally at the beginning stages of the lawsuit
Calm the fuck down.. 11:59pm tonight yea go ahead start freaking out..
Until then chill... also it's not like even of the injunction doesn't happen, that doesn't mean the judge ruled in favor of NY in the case.. we are literally at the beginning stages of the lawsuit
Karpteach
6.5 Creedmoor
We have no choice but to keep hoping. Our minds and hearts know the truth yet, hope is EVER Lasting.
carpediem
.338 Win Mag
His order for take out while he watches innocent people become criminals and the criminals left unimpeded by the state? It will be on him.
maverick52
.223 Rem
I think we are all pissed off watching Horchul and Adams on their victory lap today. Then the delayed decision. It’s a lot of angst especially when it’s such a clear act of defiance to SCOTUS
maverick52
.223 Rem
WestchesterDoc
.177 BB
Everyone should just relax. Just as likely he’s writing a solid order that will withstand the 2nd circuit overturning the injunction. Just no way to know until we see the order, or the clock strikes midnight.
Or the injunction (or rejection of injunction) comes tomorrow.
There is nothing saying it has to he today and no later.. yes the judge said he wanted to make his decision before the 1st. Maybe he didn't think it'd take as long to go through everything and he will make his decision later than even he expected
You and me both.
FrankenCub
.338 Win Mag
I just came here to post that lmao
No injunction
Antonyuk v. Bruen, 1:22-cv-00734 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Antonyuk v. Bruen, 1:22-cv-00734 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
maverick52
.223 Rem
Keep hoping.
Keep hoping for what.. its done. The judge did not grant the injunction,
Law goes into effect tomorrow. On to the next part of the case
kev74
20×102mm Vulcan
Moot???
I don't think that word means what he thinks it means
I don't think that word means what he thinks it means
Yea I don't know why he put that tbh
Judges denial for injunction
US RIFLE M1A
.45 acp
Dismissed.
DECISION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs' Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3}. Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 9 ) is denied without prejudice as moot. Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 21 ) is denied without prejudice as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this action. Signed by Chief District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/31/2022. (sal ) (Entered: 08/31/2022)
DECISION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs' Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3}. Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 9 ) is denied without prejudice as moot. Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 21 ) is denied without prejudice as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this action. Signed by Chief District Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/31/2022. (sal ) (Entered: 08/31/2022)
US RIFLE M1A
.45 acp
Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction – #48 in Antonyuk v. Bruen (N.D.N.Y., 1:22-cv-00734) – CourtListener.com
DECISION AND ORDER that Plaintiffs' Complaint (Dkt. No. 1 ) is sua sponte DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3}. Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. No. 9 ) is denied without prejudice as moot. Defendant's...
Egret-II
.40 S&W
Does that mean that our permits are useless now?
For the time being