Would you support a ban on semi-automatic weapons and ammunition?

O

onzi710

.177 BB
Messages
8
Reaction score
18
Location
Buffalo
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.
I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.
 
Jem45472

Jem45472

.308 Win
Messages
4,139
Reaction score
6,660
Location
Erie
onzi710 said:
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily?
Click to expand...
Why deny the potential victim of the same? Ridiculous question.

This isn't about hunting. In a stressful situation you're bound to have missed shots. I want every advantage that someone else may have.
 
S&W Fan

S&W Fan

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
13,139
Reaction score
19,254
Location
Central NY
onzi710 said:
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.
I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.
Click to expand...
Where did you “ use” to hunt? Sounds like the crowd that you hunted with were a bunch of punks. I’ve hunted for more than half my life and not once was I Ever criticized for using my grandfather’s semi auto 30-06
 
Uninformed and Compliant

Uninformed and Compliant

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
12,894
Reaction score
48,258
Location
CNY
onzi710 said:
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.
I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure you have no idea what you are talking about.

I also bet 25 internets that Onzi710 is a prohibited person getting some of that sweet, sweet NYS tax money given to Everytown.

In the mean time, skip to the part where you, or anyone, including government, can COMPEL a weak person of good character to yield an advantage against a mob of unlawful attackers.
 
Last edited:
Phazer

Phazer

.338 Win Mag
Messages
9,196
Reaction score
18,868
Location
Province of Westchester
onzi710 said:
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.
I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.
Click to expand...
TROLL!

Begone foul creature. Return to the depths from which you came.
 
Tisto

Tisto

.308 Win
Messages
3,349
Reaction score
5,602
Location
Tonawanda
Who are you REALLY ? FED boi ? One of Hochul's lackies ? Just go away. Nobody wants to hear your anti rhetoric.

No, I would not, nor would anyone else that has the ability to think and reason, give up their semiautomatic so that a bunch of liberal retards FEEL better.

My suggestion to you is to just give up all your guns completely. The police will protect you if there is ever a problem. The Government is there for your every need.


Anyone else notice an increased number of TROLLS around here recently ?
 
Rap

Rap

.357 mag
Messages
558
Reaction score
578
Location
Rochester
@onzi710:
Semiautomatic is non-negotiable -- completely off the table. It's essential for defense. And there is no such thing as "semiautomatic ammunition".
There are bolt action/lever action/semiauto firearms all of the same caliber.
 
Last edited:
Jsmegs77

Jsmegs77

.308 Win
Messages
2,956
Reaction score
5,388
Location
Susquehanna Co. PA
onzi710 said:
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.
I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.
Click to expand...
Nope. The phrase “Shall not be infringed” is black and white, and only capable of misinterpretation by extreme mental gymnastics which indicate severe defect in the development of logic and reason.

I will not accept an infringement of my rights in lieu of punishing the criminal for their actions. If mass shooters were captured alive, convicted beyond a reasonable doubt, and summarily stood up against a wall and shot (speedily, no protracted trial bullshit), I posit that you would see a marked reduction in such crimes. If mass shooters were not made the subject of a torrent of mass media attention, resulting in their names being recognizable to a vast number of the population, I believe there would also be a reduction. These people who write lengthy papers on their crimes are narcissistic in the extreme, and want to be known.

As an aside, criminal acts of murder have fuck all to do with hunting. It’s quite beyond me how hunting always comes up in discussions of these crimes. I’ve never heard carpentry mentioned in any talk about a murder committed with a hammer, for example. It’s frankly idiotic.
 
dwa12479

dwa12479

.338 Win Mag
Messages
6,317
Reaction score
12,436
Location
Dark Side of the Moon
onzi710 said:
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.
I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.
Click to expand...
This is some of the biggest bunch of FUDD drivel I've ever heard. Maybe you could cut your dick off to help prevent rape.
 
M

mca90guitar

.357 mag
Messages
571
Reaction score
612
Location
NY
Crazy, bunch of Hunter I know have expensive semi autos and knock ducks and geese out of the sky every fall.

Quick YouTube, oh shit. Look at all those hogs getting shot with semi autos.

1) the people that often mock you are fudds or anti gun dorks that wouldn't know how to take the gun off safety with a YouTube tutorial. I couldn't give less of a shit about their opinions.

2) fuck no on the ban, the second amendment has nothing to do with hunting.

" But the gov has drones your AR won't go anything". Lol, watch how fast even the libs take up arms when drones start dropping bombs in cities.
 
Jmac00

Jmac00

.475 A&M Magnum
Messages
17,786
Reaction score
48,378
Location
somewhere in America
onzi710 said:
Mass killings cannot be stopped, but why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily? Sure, a pump, revolver, lever, or bolt action will kill but no way it can even come close to a semi.
I carry a semi or revolver for personal protection. I would happily give up the semi if it would lead to a (slow) reduction in the availability of that type of weapon.

When I use to hunt, absolutely no one carried a semi-automatic rifle since this would result in mocking their marksmanship or competence with a firearm. The goal was always one shot and done.
Click to expand...
your kidding right? what about those that hunt with a 1100? Like duck hunters? what about my buddies that hunt Bear with a semi-auto 30-06?

This bullshit has nothing to do with how the machine runs/works, this is all about controlling the LAW ABIDING citizen.

when was the last time a Law Abiding family man started shooting everyone in sight...............oh thats right, NEVER.

absolute bullshit
 
Saltwater60

Saltwater60

.950 JDJ
Messages
31,472
Reaction score
35,201
Location
Western NY
Your line of thinking will leave us with rocks and knives under 2” in blade length, oh wait a jugular vein is under 2” from the skins surface so scratch that. You’re a fool of you think they will stop with semi auto rifles or semi autos in general. Look at Canada and the UK. Canada is banning all pistols from future sale not just semi autos correct?
Wake up marksmen.
 
Last edited:
Uninformed and Compliant

Uninformed and Compliant

.450/400 Nitro Ex
Messages
12,894
Reaction score
48,258
Location
CNY
onzi710 said:
why give the killer the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily?
Click to expand...
It's really sick that you would condemn a black man, who is being chased down by a car load of racists intent on lynching him... you'd condemn him to be murdered because "nobody should have the advantage of a weapon which cycles quickly, carries multiple rounds, and can be reloaded easily."

That is disgusting.

Then again, Democrats have a long, long history of wanting their victims disarmed.

1654108018077.png
 
Deplorable Me

Deplorable Me

.577 Tyrannosaur.
Messages
23,987
Reaction score
46,683
Location
Western Front; Occupied NY
Why is government so obsessed with suburban and rural firearm ownership and allows urban illegal ownership to proliferate and encourages it via bail release and allowing multi crime offenders to keep arming? Urban criminals tend to work in packs. The problem is in suppressing the news on a national level not suburban and rural gun owners.

Feel free to exchange the word " news" with "propaganda".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top