Active Shooter Mandalay Bay
- Thread starter Darth
- Start date
freddy
.308 Win
PROOF ELVIS WAS SECOND SHOOTER!!!
Newly released evidence (Youtube video) removes all doubt!!!
Newly released evidence (Youtube video) removes all doubt!!!
PROOF ELVIS WAS SECOND SHOOTER!!!
Newly released evidence (Youtube video) removes all doubt!!!
They already made that movie....
freddy
.308 Win
Ha ha! Touche!
livingston
20×102mm Vulcan
Where are the other 259 photos ... ? When was the above screenshot taken ? ... I know we all like firearms but I find it a bit odd at what we are seeing in the above screenshot. ... Kind of like that Roof fellow and the confederate flag ...
Magnus
6.5 Creedmoor
Case closed folks, let’s go back to our regular lives.
My issues with the video:
no weapon specified.
No caliber specified.
No mention of the victims wounds; caliber or angle
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
They left out the 2nd gunman. What ever happened to that other gunman/gunmen?
Magnus
6.5 Creedmoor
You can actually hear the police on the badge cam mention other shooters.
MothMan
.338 Win Mag
freddy
.308 Win
Ah ha! Missing brass! Proof of conspiracy! Russia! China! Clinton! Antifa! NSA! FBI! Reptile aliens! Democratic Grandmothers Union!
It was the build a bears!
Catskillkid
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I knew those bastards were hiding something. Them and the god dang care bears have been screwing us for years now. And don't get me started on my little pony either.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Former las Vegas police chief finds the information to be suspicious . Just another conspiracy theorist.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
^^^ Without looking at the video.
1. we don't know. he's dead
2. it was a shitshow and getting an exact timeline is difficult
3. the shooter wanted to blow shit up?
4. we don't know. it's missing
1. we don't know. he's dead
2. it was a shitshow and getting an exact timeline is difficult
3. the shooter wanted to blow shit up?
4. we don't know. it's missing
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Old news. Nobody cares anymore. Mission accomplished. Let's talk about this on the news instead.
Thanksgiving day 2017.
Thanksgiving day 2017.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
^^^ Very fake news.
freddy
.308 Win
HA HA HA!!!
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Which part is wrong?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Your whole post.
^^^ Without looking at the video.
1. we don't know. he's dead
2. it was a shitshow and getting an exact timeline is difficult
3. the shooter wanted to blow shit up?
4. we don't know. it's missing
The police in the video didn't address any of these things .
^^^ Without looking at the video.
1. we don't know. he's dead
2. it was a shitshow and getting an exact timeline is difficult
3. the shooter wanted to blow shit up?
4. we don't know. it's missing
The police in the video didn't address any of these things .
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Your whole post.
^^^ Without looking at the video.
1. we don't know. he's dead
2. it was a shitshow and getting an exact timeline is difficult
3. the shooter wanted to blow shit up?
4. we don't know. it's missing
The police in the video didn't address any of these things . Where were you correct?
^^^ Without looking at the video.
1. we don't know. he's dead
2. it was a shitshow and getting an exact timeline is difficult
3. the shooter wanted to blow shit up?
4. we don't know. it's missing
The police in the video didn't address any of these things . Where were you correct?
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Who said anything about police addressing anything? Or even police for that matter. The video still has four questions. I answered them with what I thought to be pretty obvious answers. I did happen to watch the video though and the interviewer is clearly suggesting there is some cover up as well. She kept asking where was the hard drive where was the hard drive where was the hard drive where was the hard drive. As if repeating it over and over would make it appear. What an imbecile. This is a filler interview.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
How about he video? the four questions on the front of the video were never even asked in the video !
you call her an idiot for asking what happened to the hard drive? Really? You think that missing evidence is a dumb question? the police have no explanation for it. and you think that's dumb? WTF? That means paddock brought a computer with no hard to his room or the police removed his hard drive in his room which they would never do because they would have turned it over to lab for analysis, not remove a hard drive at the crime scene.
You think taking the largest mass murder in American history away from homicide detective's and giving it to internal affairs is a dumb question ? The police are freaking the fuck out over it! If it was your kid that was dead you would be jumping up and down !
You know what I think is dumb? Commenting on a video you never watched.
you call her an idiot for asking what happened to the hard drive? Really? You think that missing evidence is a dumb question? the police have no explanation for it. and you think that's dumb? WTF? That means paddock brought a computer with no hard to his room or the police removed his hard drive in his room which they would never do because they would have turned it over to lab for analysis, not remove a hard drive at the crime scene.
You think taking the largest mass murder in American history away from homicide detective's and giving it to internal affairs is a dumb question ? The police are freaking the fuck out over it! If it was your kid that was dead you would be jumping up and down !
You know what I think is dumb? Commenting on a video you never watched.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Did you happen to read my post ("I did happen to watch the video though and the interviewer is clearly suggesting there is some cover up as well.")? Or watch the video? If those four questions weren't asked then how is it a video still in your original post lol?! Those 4 questions are asked literally 30 seconds into the video. And there are only two possible explanations to why a laptop has no hard drive in it? Either Paddock hid it somewhere or it's a big cover up? Why is everything so black and white for you? That doesn't make for very good police work. What if that computer was left there from the previous guest? What if the hard drive was in fact taken out by the police? What if another agency has it? What if it's some idiot that thinks it's a computer but it's actually some type of tablet or dvd player? We do have idiots that think aks are ars and every pistol is a glock. I could go on and on with possibilities but I suppose some will always go to the conspiracy theory because they want so badly for it to be true. Now that's dumb.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
="gun_slinger_boyDid you happen to read my post ("I did happen to watch the video though and the interviewer is clearly suggesting there is some cover up as well.")?
Yes ,I read your second post. but your first post you said you never watched the video and gave some lame answers to questions that were never even discussed.
the interviewer is Laura Ingraham
Ingraham worked as a speechwriter in the Ronald Reaganadministration for the Domestic Policy Advisor. She also briefly served as editor of The Prospect, the magazine issued by Concerned Alumni of Princeton After law school, in 1991, she served as a law clerk for Judge Ralph K. Winter, Jr., of the U.S. Courtof Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York and subsequently clerked for U.S. Supreme CourtJustice Clarence Thomas. She then worked as an attorney at the New York-based law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Ingraham launched The Laura Ingraham Show in April 2001, which is heard on 306 stations and on XM Satellite Radio. It was originally syndicated by Westwood One, but moved to Talk Radio Network in 2004. Ingraham was also the official guest host of The O'Reilly Factor on Fox News Channel and a weekly contributor with her segment, "The Ingraham Angle"
Shes an former lawyer, an unlike you, finds missing evidence disturbing. She unlike you , finds that to be a serious problem .Being a laywer she knows how important that hard drive can be and what kind of evidence can be found on it .
If those four questions weren't asked then how is it a video still in your original post lol?! Those 4 questions are asked literally 30 seconds into the video.
The you tube poster, for what ever reason, found that to be relevant enough to include it in his video. The point I made in my post had nothing to do with those questions as I stated , it was the police response to the shooting that was relevant only. which you fail to address.
And there are only two possible explanations to why a laptop has no hard drive in it? Either Paddock hid it somewhere or it's a big cover up? Why is everything so black and white for you?
No its not black and white at all, it has to be paddock the police or somebody else, and if its missing , and the police had it , it would make it a cover up. So where the fuck would he hide it? His Pants? Your logic is absurd , It would have to be in the room, or it would require him to bring a laptop with no use to his room . that makes sense only to people like you , who cant fucking think . secondly for what purpose would he hide it when he was going to kill himself , ?? that doesn't make any fucking sense whatsoever. thirdly, it if he hid it in room , the police would have found it. its not in his home or car,and its not in his room . what the fuck happened to his lap top is a legitimate question , that you or anyone else can answer.
The police losing the hard drive is not acceptable, nor do they claim to ever have been in possession of it. so they couldn't have lost it.
That doesn't make for very good police work.
What would you know about it? guessing at videos? not looking at the evidence because you already know the answers makes you an expert?
What if that computer was left there from the previous guest?
He had multiple computers in the room and the police identified it as his , so your wrong again.
What if the hard drive was in fact taken out by the police?
Then it wouldn't be missing then would it? it would be lost. the police are saying its missing. In other words they claim to have obtained the computer without a hard drive. If what the police are saying is true , it means the hard drive was gone when they entered the room. which leaves us with what possibilitys?
A) Paddock brought a useless computer to his room , took out the hard drive, and hid it in the room so well the police cant find it after 2 months which only a moron would conclude.
B) the police, who never claimed they had it , lost it .
C)it had some kind of damming evidence of on it , and was confiscated by the FBI .
D) fairy's made it disappear forever.
If the FBI didn't take the hard drive then where the hell is it? the police never had it. it would have to be in his room unless he hid somewhere after he was dead
What if another agency has it?
That's very likely, but again it wouldn't be missing, and the police would know where its at . If the FBI did take it , they would have notified the police that they did as would be legally required . which means if they took it. they took it illegally. if they took it illegally they would have a motive for it. Something on the hard drive was important enough to confiscate.
What if it's some idiot that thinks it's a computer but it's actually some type of tablet or dvd player?
LOL,NO, I cant even imagine such a scenario , theres a team of investigators , even if it happened , it would have been corrected ."'Hey Jim the hard drive is missing from this computer,whats up? that's because its a tablet you fucking idiot."" wouldn't happen ever.
We do have idiots that think aks are ars and every pistol is a glock. I could go on and on with possibilities but I suppose some will always go to the conspiracy theory because they want so badly for it to be true. Now that's dumb
Until you can come up with a believable explanation to what happed to it, Id say your the most gullible man on this forum .Conspiracy's happen every fucking day your just to stupid to grasp that, two men plan to rob a 7 eleven is a fucking conspiracy. the Mafia is a conspiracy, if the police knowingly covered up facts , its a conspiracy. If Hillary Clinton rigged the DNC it would be a conspiracy.
When something doesn't add up, you don't dismiss it because you have no explanation for it. you look into it and look at the real possibilities , not the far fetched idea that he took a laptop to his room that didn't work or contain a hard drive. or that he took his computer apart in his room and hid the hard drive in a really secret place that the police cant find. That's 4th grade logic.
If the FBI or anybody else ,took the hard drive without telling the police , THAT is a conspiracy!! and somebody did, which means there is a conspiracy to hide information on his computer from the public.
the other possibility was that he wasn't in the room alone and somebody took that hard drive with them when they left. which again would become a conspiracy of more than one person. the hard drive cannot leave the room without somebody taking it. SOMEBODY took that fucking hard drive and the police say it wasn't them
Yes ,I read your second post. but your first post you said you never watched the video and gave some lame answers to questions that were never even discussed.
the interviewer is Laura Ingraham
Ingraham worked as a speechwriter in the Ronald Reaganadministration for the Domestic Policy Advisor. She also briefly served as editor of The Prospect, the magazine issued by Concerned Alumni of Princeton After law school, in 1991, she served as a law clerk for Judge Ralph K. Winter, Jr., of the U.S. Courtof Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York and subsequently clerked for U.S. Supreme CourtJustice Clarence Thomas. She then worked as an attorney at the New York-based law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom Ingraham launched The Laura Ingraham Show in April 2001, which is heard on 306 stations and on XM Satellite Radio. It was originally syndicated by Westwood One, but moved to Talk Radio Network in 2004. Ingraham was also the official guest host of The O'Reilly Factor on Fox News Channel and a weekly contributor with her segment, "The Ingraham Angle"
Shes an former lawyer, an unlike you, finds missing evidence disturbing. She unlike you , finds that to be a serious problem .Being a laywer she knows how important that hard drive can be and what kind of evidence can be found on it .
If those four questions weren't asked then how is it a video still in your original post lol?! Those 4 questions are asked literally 30 seconds into the video.
The you tube poster, for what ever reason, found that to be relevant enough to include it in his video. The point I made in my post had nothing to do with those questions as I stated , it was the police response to the shooting that was relevant only. which you fail to address.
And there are only two possible explanations to why a laptop has no hard drive in it? Either Paddock hid it somewhere or it's a big cover up? Why is everything so black and white for you?
No its not black and white at all, it has to be paddock the police or somebody else, and if its missing , and the police had it , it would make it a cover up. So where the fuck would he hide it? His Pants? Your logic is absurd , It would have to be in the room, or it would require him to bring a laptop with no use to his room . that makes sense only to people like you , who cant fucking think . secondly for what purpose would he hide it when he was going to kill himself , ?? that doesn't make any fucking sense whatsoever. thirdly, it if he hid it in room , the police would have found it. its not in his home or car,and its not in his room . what the fuck happened to his lap top is a legitimate question , that you or anyone else can answer.
The police losing the hard drive is not acceptable, nor do they claim to ever have been in possession of it. so they couldn't have lost it.
That doesn't make for very good police work.
What would you know about it? guessing at videos? not looking at the evidence because you already know the answers makes you an expert?
What if that computer was left there from the previous guest?
He had multiple computers in the room and the police identified it as his , so your wrong again.
What if the hard drive was in fact taken out by the police?
Then it wouldn't be missing then would it? it would be lost. the police are saying its missing. In other words they claim to have obtained the computer without a hard drive. If what the police are saying is true , it means the hard drive was gone when they entered the room. which leaves us with what possibilitys?
A) Paddock brought a useless computer to his room , took out the hard drive, and hid it in the room so well the police cant find it after 2 months which only a moron would conclude.
B) the police, who never claimed they had it , lost it .
C)it had some kind of damming evidence of on it , and was confiscated by the FBI .
D) fairy's made it disappear forever.
If the FBI didn't take the hard drive then where the hell is it? the police never had it. it would have to be in his room unless he hid somewhere after he was dead
What if another agency has it?
That's very likely, but again it wouldn't be missing, and the police would know where its at . If the FBI did take it , they would have notified the police that they did as would be legally required . which means if they took it. they took it illegally. if they took it illegally they would have a motive for it. Something on the hard drive was important enough to confiscate.
What if it's some idiot that thinks it's a computer but it's actually some type of tablet or dvd player?
LOL,NO, I cant even imagine such a scenario , theres a team of investigators , even if it happened , it would have been corrected ."'Hey Jim the hard drive is missing from this computer,whats up? that's because its a tablet you fucking idiot."" wouldn't happen ever.
We do have idiots that think aks are ars and every pistol is a glock. I could go on and on with possibilities but I suppose some will always go to the conspiracy theory because they want so badly for it to be true. Now that's dumb
Until you can come up with a believable explanation to what happed to it, Id say your the most gullible man on this forum .Conspiracy's happen every fucking day your just to stupid to grasp that, two men plan to rob a 7 eleven is a fucking conspiracy. the Mafia is a conspiracy, if the police knowingly covered up facts , its a conspiracy. If Hillary Clinton rigged the DNC it would be a conspiracy.
When something doesn't add up, you don't dismiss it because you have no explanation for it. you look into it and look at the real possibilities , not the far fetched idea that he took a laptop to his room that didn't work or contain a hard drive. or that he took his computer apart in his room and hid the hard drive in a really secret place that the police cant find. That's 4th grade logic.
If the FBI or anybody else ,took the hard drive without telling the police , THAT is a conspiracy!! and somebody did, which means there is a conspiracy to hide information on his computer from the public.
the other possibility was that he wasn't in the room alone and somebody took that hard drive with them when they left. which again would become a conspiracy of more than one person. the hard drive cannot leave the room without somebody taking it. SOMEBODY took that fucking hard drive and the police say it wasn't them
Last edited:
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
I'm not even going to read your whole post. It seems you're really angry about this and for what? You sound like a damn fool and I won't waste my time with logic anymore. I'm done with you.
Catskillkid
.450/400 Nitro Ex
FBI: Report On Las Vegas Shooting Should Be Done By Anniversary
Looks like we may have some answers. Next year. Hopefully.
Looks like we may have some answers. Next year. Hopefully.
Robin
.475 A&M Magnum
Yep, they'll have all the loose ends tied up by then.
Robin
Robin
Catskillkid
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Not fishy at all either.
Robin
.475 A&M Magnum
Rehearsal for the FBI report presentation.
Robin
Robin