Conspiracy
- Thread starter DoD1776
- Start date
100%
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
freddy, post:You provide a single blurry close up. If it was a coverup why would they provide that photo?
Overlooked .
Not obvious it is damage caused by a shotgun or rifle.
I don't know one person on this gun forum who would contest it other than you. If contested, it would need to be contested by Illustration.
Do have any closeup photos in focus?
yes there are, You have to dig through the police photos to find them .
Even if that was damage from shotshell... so what?
Its never been addressed by the police , and it is a mystery why it is there.
Might be a clerical error or ND by police
A clerical error? A shotgun blast was a clerical error? The police said there no empty shotgun casings found, Is that a clerical error also? The police say he never fired his shotgun, it was found in the car,clerical error? A ND would have been recorded. It would Have to be recorded . or the officer could lose his job for omitting it .
Could be either to my untrained eye. Debris from impact of rifle bullet could cause that possibly. But I am not a ballistics expert. Are you?
No Im not an expert, But Ive fired thousands of rounds of both calibers at dozens or hundreds of types of targets and Ive never seen a small caliber rifle round mimic a shotgun round ever. Not once. This is a gun forum , Im sure there are experts or people with enough experience on here to either verify or deny what Im saying . Your going to be hard pressed to find anyone on here who thinks that damage was made by 223.
- what of it? Massive conspiracy? Coverup? Staged shooting with crisis actors? Not a real school?
This shotgun blast contradicts the police official account , that no shotgun was used by police or the shooter. No empty shotgun caseings were found or cataloged. This in itself does not prove a conspiracy . What it does show is that police have omitted this from all the reports . This SUPPORTS my claim that we were not told the truth of what happened.
Come on man. Let's see something substantial. So far we have not. Do you have anything else?
This is massively substantial evidence that We weren't told the truth . Yes I have a shit ton of things to discuss.
Overlooked .
Not obvious it is damage caused by a shotgun or rifle.
I don't know one person on this gun forum who would contest it other than you. If contested, it would need to be contested by Illustration.
Do have any closeup photos in focus?
yes there are, You have to dig through the police photos to find them .
Even if that was damage from shotshell... so what?
Its never been addressed by the police , and it is a mystery why it is there.
Might be a clerical error or ND by police
A clerical error? A shotgun blast was a clerical error? The police said there no empty shotgun casings found, Is that a clerical error also? The police say he never fired his shotgun, it was found in the car,clerical error? A ND would have been recorded. It would Have to be recorded . or the officer could lose his job for omitting it .
Could be either to my untrained eye. Debris from impact of rifle bullet could cause that possibly. But I am not a ballistics expert. Are you?
No Im not an expert, But Ive fired thousands of rounds of both calibers at dozens or hundreds of types of targets and Ive never seen a small caliber rifle round mimic a shotgun round ever. Not once. This is a gun forum , Im sure there are experts or people with enough experience on here to either verify or deny what Im saying . Your going to be hard pressed to find anyone on here who thinks that damage was made by 223.
- what of it? Massive conspiracy? Coverup? Staged shooting with crisis actors? Not a real school?
This shotgun blast contradicts the police official account , that no shotgun was used by police or the shooter. No empty shotgun caseings were found or cataloged. This in itself does not prove a conspiracy . What it does show is that police have omitted this from all the reports . This SUPPORTS my claim that we were not told the truth of what happened.
Come on man. Let's see something substantial. So far we have not. Do you have anything else?
This is massively substantial evidence that We weren't told the truth . Yes I have a shit ton of things to discuss.
freddy
.308 Win
Ok, but please just list the top three most incriminating, most damning, most irrefutable items that prove a cover up.
And no more yellow text please - it cannot be read on certain backgrounds. Any dark color will work.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
There are plenty of crazy cops. I don’t have to watch anything. I know it’s impossible for that many people to be part of a cover up. It simply cannot happen. The director of the cia could not hide the fact that he was banging some author and you think to gov can orchestrate a massive cover up like this?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Its not that simple Sir. Statements must be backed up by some type of documentation .
My screen has a dark background Ill simply use italics .
Police report page 28
The mother wanted to buy the shooter a CZ 83 pistol for Christmas and had prepared a check for that purchase to give the shooter.
The problem is that Adam didn't have a pistol permit because he was only 20 years old. So where are we going with this right?
This supports the fact that we are being fed a false narrative .
My screen has a dark background Ill simply use italics .
Police report page 28
The mother wanted to buy the shooter a CZ 83 pistol for Christmas and had prepared a check for that purchase to give the shooter.
The problem is that Adam didn't have a pistol permit because he was only 20 years old. So where are we going with this right?
This supports the fact that we are being fed a false narrative .
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I don't have to watch a video. I know what i know.
Yep. That's what I thought. Don't ask me another question until you do your homework.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
100 percent.
No more yellow text please and no more inserting text within the quotes. It breaks the quotes.
It's unreadable. I end up skipping over it which is a shame because you know what you are talking about.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
Last question... do you miss your sanity?
So if I am to understand this correctly, there is a massive conspiracy that would take all of the thousands of people it would take to pull this off...but they can't get the date correct on a check?Its not that simple Sir. Statements must be backed up by some type of documentation .
My screen has a dark background Ill simply use italics .
Police report page 28
The mother wanted to buy the shooter a CZ 83 pistol for Christmas and had prepared a check for that purchase to give the shooter.
The problem is that Adam didn't have a pistol permit because he was only 20 years old. So where are we going with this right?
This supports the fact that we are being fed a false narrative .
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Ill use Italics , Its hard to answer 15 questions in one paragraph and make any sense. I break each question down and answer it separately
Sometimes it gets to jumbled if I don't .
Sometimes it gets to jumbled if I don't .
I wish I could like this a million times.
Holdover, if you drag your mouse over any text in a post, a pop up menu comes up to quote things. Just click.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
The 50k it would take to pull this off are not perfect sir. That’s why they have nbc to cover for them.
It kind of goes along with my side question of:
So we have this all powerful government that can lie cheat and steal, make up false narratives, censor people, kill people to cover things up right? Ok, and that same government can't censor people "digging too deep into their master plan" on an Internet forum?
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
So how many innocents were killed by the cops in the pulse nightclub? That entry could not have been without some collateral damage.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
Pretty sure the mother knew how old her son was, and that he could not buy a Pistol . What does the evidence tell you?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
It kind of goes along with my side question of:
So we have this all powerful government that can lie cheat and steal, make up false narratives, censor people, kill people to cover things up right? Ok, and that same government can't censor people "digging too deep into their master plan" on an Internet forum?
why would they bother? were no threat to anybody , were just a couple of fruitcake conspiracy theorists who believe the lizards are taking over.
That the people orchestrating this cover up...invented a document to make it specifically look false?
What?
What does it tell you, because I am completely lost on that one.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
At least a few! But that's another case.
Ah, they are just waiting until your movement gains momentum before they send out the death squads...
?
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
They were never reported. I would say it’s more than a few.
By the way, this brings up another point.
You said the damning evidence was classified, so you couldn't provide proof. But the "evidence" you provided...didn't make it to the classified bin? Did they mail it to the wrong address or something?
You said the damning evidence was classified, so you couldn't provide proof. But the "evidence" you provided...didn't make it to the classified bin? Did they mail it to the wrong address or something?
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
It can be one or the other . the mother gave money to her demented son who she was afraid of , to buy a CZ when she knew he didn't have a pistol permit or could buy one , or somebody creating the false narrative overlooked the fact .
Theres no way in the world she gave that kid money to buy a specific gun when she knew he wasn't old enough to buy it.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
probably
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
Is it possible the mom didn’t know what a cz83 was?
Yeah, there is no way anybody might not know all of the gun laws of the state they are in...
Why does the document exist I guess would be my question. If I were planning a massive cover up, I wouldn't invent a document and put incorrect information on it to make people question the narrative.
holdover
.475 A&M Magnum
That's really reaching , the narrative is she was gun nut.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
I
I’m good. I will read it and watch wills video when I have to take a dump later. ThanksThat was in reference to the theory, but if you feel left out, sure, we can include you too.
ECU Pirates
.308 Win
I’m a gun nut and didn’t know much about a cz 83
THAT is reaching!?
So she was a gun nut. So let's say she knew the laws and would never give her son that money for that gun. Therefor it was all part of the false narrative, making the new narrative:
"We made up this fake document to...show people that...we made it up so...
?
my brain can't do any more backflips...