data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ea35/5ea3544e46b5ac2df927536ef8d7505ea639b342" alt="www.bastabalkana.com"
Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler - the history of banks who funded Nazis
Wall Street's funding of the Nazis. Professor Antony Sutton In his book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, provides a documented account of the role of GE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d0e/a8d0e056a88e9eb6215408dc47f066b20beaeb2d" alt="www.bastabalkana.com"
You think those guys wouldn't have existed without the US ?Hitlers rise to power was supported by American industrialists and bankers. This is well documented. Start with that.
What countries did we invade?I don't follow the logic. The countries we invaded to impose our values were looking for someone to invade them?
You think those guys wouldn't have existed without the US ?
You think they wouldn't have done the same thing if they were still British subjects instead ?
Seems like you're being a little intellectually dishonest with that response.I don't follow the logic. The countries we invaded to impose our values were looking for someone to invade them?
LoL.They had the power of U.S. industrial and banking systems. Other bad players, real or hypothetical, is not a justification for being a bad player.
I call it the canine theory of international relations, based on the old joke:Bingo!
When I took a course in international relations in college, the takeaway message seemed to be "Might makes right." Strength, by a country that desires peace, promotes peace. Weakness by a country that desires peace results in strength exerted by opposing nations that want peace on their hostile terms.
LoL.
Your whole argument is that the US is terrible.
My argument is literally that it is better than everyone else.
So, everyone else being worse if we didn't exist is precisely the point.
But, sure, Robber Barons sucked. You know who was worse ? The East India Company.
If you think the world would be better off with more East India's and fewer Rockafellers, there's no helping you.
Seems like you're being a little intellectually dishonest with that response.
Which countries did we invade where there werent attrocities against civilians being carried out, genocide, or as a response to an attack against us first?
Would you agree that in regards to our ALLIES around the world that if we werent providing them economic and military support that they wouldnt look to other major world powers for the same?
Maybe, but considerably less shit than everyone else.Not terrible, just full of shit. Look at the mentality of people in this thread. Education replaced by indoctrination. It's scary.
Maybe, but considerably less shit than everyone else.
Look, if you put the US atrocities in perspective with the rest of the world, we're saints.
What's the worst things we've done ?
Well, everyone else did those too, and they did a lot worse.
When we were doing the worst stuff we've ever done, most of the rest of the world still considered the peasants disposable propery of the nobility.
So, if you judge the US actions against the standards of the time they occurred in, we were very good.
Obviously if you try to hold the world of 200 years ago to a modern standard, they're all terrible.
Like the Rwandan civil war that resulted in genocide? Waiting for you to blame that on the US in 3, 2,1.....Modern era, post-WWII. More people were killed in our wars then in wars of any other country.
Like the Rwandan civil war that resulted in genocide? Waiting for you to blame that on the US in 3, 2,1.....
Well, we did tend to get involved in every conflict on the planet since then.Modern era, post-WWII. More people were killed in our wars then in wars of any other country.
Stalinist Russia ? China ? Each of them have killed more people than the Nazi's, by an order of magnitude.
LOL, ok, Stalin and Mao were great leaders who cared deeply about their people. Sure.False and discredited propaganda.
LOL, ok, Stalin and Mao were great leaders who cared deeply about their people. Sure.
What color is the sky in your world ?
interestingI'd like to think we could steer clear.
No, no, no. Stalin murdered half of the Soviet citizenry and didn't do anything good. They were mysteriously reproducing just before every census to cover up his genocide.
Sure, you can trust a soviet census.No, no, no. Stalin murdered half of the Soviet citizenry and didn't do anything good. They were mysteriously reproducing just before every census to cover up his genocide.
Shipping lanes will be nonexistent if a prolonged war breaks out. .. ships will never get any insurance for one thing.Distance from China to Taiwan: 100 miles.
Distance from Taiwan to the USA: 7,619 miles.
So even with a Carrier Group operating in Theater, just exactly what is the U.S. Military going to do in the face of a full scale invasion? China could have 750,000 troops on the ground in days. Kind of makes this whole "who is better" argument pointless. Add in the fact that Biden's puppet masters would not allow a counter attack regardless and it becomes irrelevant. Further - Projection Of Power relies on the other Nations not having the technology, force, and willpower to withstand a full on assault. China is on the verge of developing hypersonic weapons and what their standard armament lacks in advances is still made up by numbers. They are beyond not afraid, they have become confrontational. And this is on their front doorstep. What it the actual reality of a full scale defensive effort on our part being sustainable or even possible when our Dear Leaders have crippled our domestic oil production and global supply lines are falling apart? (funny - it's like this was all planned)
Just nuke 'em? Funny - we've kind of determined what impact that would have. If you survive your homesteader skills better be on point.
Um...no. if you read it you would see the 7 million was much lower than expected.In close to 30 years of Stalin's rule there were only 600,000 death sentences carried out. That includes criminals, nazi colaborators guilty of war crimes and corrupt officials. Subsequent review by Chruschev appointed commission found only 5% of these cases didn't have sufficient evidence of guilt.
70% of Russian people today have positive opinion of Stalin, higher then of any other Soviet leader. I guess Russian people know less about their history then unbiased Westerners.
The above article actually proves my point. 7 million population growth. Must have been quite a baby boom to compensate for the countless victims.
600,000 actual death sentences, and several million people just randomly dropped dead, while being forced to work in brutal conditions and not being fed. Must have been early covid I guess.In close to 30 years of Stalin's rule there were only 600,000 death sentences carried out. That includes criminals, nazi colaborators guilty of war crimes and corrupt officials. Subsequent review by Chruschev appointed commission found only 5% of these cases didn't have sufficient evidence of guilt.
70% of Russian people today have positive opinion of Stalin, higher then of any other Soviet leader. I guess Russian people know less about their history then unbiased Westerners.
The above article actually proves my point. 7 million population growth. Must have been quite a baby boom to compensate for the countless victims.
600,000 actual death sentences, and several million people just randomly dropped dead, while being forced to work in brutal conditions and not being fed. Must have been early covid I guess.
Um...no. if you read it you would see the 7 million was much lower than expected.
As for the "only 600,000" claim -
a) you're off by quite a bit
b) even at that number is that something to be proud of?
Yea, Stalin was far worse. The only one to give him a run for his money was chairman Mao.To equate Stalin to Hitler is laughable.
Factoring in average life expectancy at the time and length of sentences it wasn't as bad