Yes but no deadline given. What's a reasonable time? A week? A month? 6 Months? 18 Months?
That’s a good question. But I think 30 days is more than reasonable. If I were the applicants I would apply for relief again next month
I goggled reasonable time frame and it says the standard is from 48 hours to 10 calendar days so we'll see .
Oh, sorry, i didn`t know.
While the court on Wednesday let a New York handgun restriction stand pending further legal action, Alito essentially said the challengers should remain vigilant and keep the pressure on the courts.
I have a feeling some gears are turning in the background to make it look like they are working on it.
They need to rile up their base so that the left is ok with packing the Supreme Court or over ruling the Bruen decision.
I doubt the Supreme Court is googling that or that they care about what google says.
Granting our stay would not have interfered with any of your thoughts here. The stay should have been granted.
Oh, trust me, I totally agree.
No....trust ME....ive been carrying 24/7 legally with an UNRESTRICTED CCW since 1989....no one feels less comfortable than me going ANYWHERE without my sidearm on my right hip. The majority of ppl with permits in this state have been unaffected by the CCIA because they've held hunting/target permits since day 1....
Wat?
Wat?
My point is that prior to the CCIA, ppl with restricted permits technically weren't allowed to carry in most places....while not illegal, they did risk, at the discretion of the issuing authority, of having their permits revoked if found to be carrying in most areas. Ive never agreed with it....im just sayin....Wat?
I think most ppl understand exactly what I said my friend. Its been common knowledge for years that issuing authorities have had the power to revoke permits of restricted permit holders if found carrying in places other than the range and hunting....to and from....etc...
Yes, that's been the unsubstantiated rumor for years.
Reread my post....I specifically said "while not illegal..."
And then you ruined it with "technically not allowed", which of course isn't true.
Lol
Are you a CCW holder and if so, was it restricted prior to Bruen?
Are you a CCW holder and if so.....was it restricted prior to Bruen?
This is true. But the risk was having your permit revoked. Not the end of the world and could fight it in court. Now it’s a class d felony. That’s a risk few are willing to take. That’s what makes this law so egregious. If the penalty was something like a fine we wouldn’t even be talking about it. But a felony is over the top bullshit.
That question is both irrelevant, as this thread is not about me, and based on a false pretense, as Bruen changed nothing in the law relating to "restrictions" as "restrictions" are not mentioned in the law.
I agree with you 100%
