Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
And one again, actions speak for themselves.
Cinder blocks. 9mm vs .40 vs .45
- Thread starter Marine Cpl
- Start date
Bananabandit
.338 Win Mag
Dont judge me
2 Sentenced for Killing Man With Cinder Block
:O
:O
Code:
https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7a6_1308752575
HighlandLofts
6.5 Creedmoor
It's PROVEN, Andrew's REPUBLIC of NEW YORKISTAN need's a SAFE ACT on CINDER BLOCKS!
HighlandLofts
6.5 Creedmoor
No cinder blocks over 4 ounces and one cubic foot.
GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
Three different Guns three different loads of Powder oh and all cinder blocks aren't built the same 
HighlandLofts
6.5 Creedmoor
THIS IS NEW YORK, CINDER BLOCKS IS NOT WHO WE ARE!
Carlos Hathcock
.450/400 Nitro Ex
I've been threatened by gangs of cinderblocks on more than one occasion. I feel better knowing which caliber I should be using to defend myself.
dwa12479
.338 Win Mag
So the cinder block still has its soul?
Saltwater60
20×102mm Vulcan
And who needs a round to go through a cider block? All you need is a round that will penetrate and stop a human. Any of those rounds listed above will do the trick.
But if you were behind the Cider block? Ahhhh
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Or if the perp is behind a refrigerator, large piece of wooden furniture, an aluminum display stand at a store, gas pump, garbage can or small dumpster returning fire. You are going to want a caliber that is better suited in penetrating these barriers.
Last edited:
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Eh. Non comparable ammo different barrel lengths. If you don't care about the barrel length then what the hell is the point lol? At least he displayed how the 45 is superior.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
All it did was make a small dent. The others went through the first layer.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
I don't like the shot placement. And I also don't like that the 45 was the shortest barrel. Why not shoot the 45 out of a 1911 and the 9 out of a short barrel?
ArmedCorgi
.475 A&M Magnum
Hard cider...
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
It wouldn't of made a difference. I've got other videos showing the 9 or .40 out penetrating the .45 on hard barriers. There's the medieval helmet, steel pot WW2 helmet, phone books, asbestos planks, ect. There are many.
Don't forget the infamous frying pan too.
Can a .45 even penetrate paper? I'm starting to wonder.
meketrefe
.450/400 Nitro Ex
Who uses FMJ's for SD ? ?
fmjs are the most popular bullets all over the world.
Some actually fragment like crazy.
In a 380 is a good idea to use fmj to gain a tad penetration.
They might not be the first choice for many for personal proteccion but if you have decent FMJ ammo do not feel
shorthanded. In certain situations might even give you a tactical advantage like shooting through glass and other
intermediate and hard barriers.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Anything soft that that requires weight for penetration.... Yes!
Anything hard that requires speed for penetration.... No!
For targets hiding behind cinder blocks or frying pans, or T 34 tanks I like to use this.
Picked one up at a Texas gun show back in the day. Skip to 6:35 for the actual firing.
Picked one up at a Texas gun show back in the day. Skip to 6:35 for the actual firing.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Funny you say that. I picked up a bunch of brass at my range yesterday and mixed in was some 357 sig brass. Looking at the brass I wasn't sure it could even reliably cut through the wind.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Jokes can be used for for diversion but facts don't lie. I used to be a 1911fanboy. Nobody could tell me that the manly .45 wasn't the beast tamer. How could it not be? It's bigger!
Well, when you research ballistics and tests and learn how bullets work, you see different. It's up to you to see these results with a bias or not. That's entirely based on your character.
Well, when you research ballistics and tests and learn how bullets work, you see different. It's up to you to see these results with a bias or not. That's entirely based on your character.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
Eh. The 45 is effective. I don't need much more research than that. And speaking of bias... if you find the 45 acp that can penetrate the notorious frying pan then it would be about capacity. Then if you find a way to increase capacity then it would be about weight. Then if you find a way to reduce the overall weight then it's about cost and so on and so on. Honestly these tests are silly. They're all effective. Use whatever you like best.