gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
I agree with Newtons laws but a pistols recoil isn't a good example of what's going on with energy transfer. A pistols recoil energy is slowed by springs, the breach face, slide mass/weight etc. And this is over an extremely short amount of time. That is, not enough time to get up to speed so to speak. A more fair comparison would be to have a pistol that had no means of catching the slide with a slide the same weight as the bullet. Also no springs or anything else to slow down the slide either (obviously). Fire the round and what would happen then? Much different right? Another way to look at it is if you put your hand up to the back of say a glock and fire what will happen? I mean put it right up flush against it. If you hold it tight enough it may even stop the action. Now you don't even have to put your hand right on the muzzle of the gun. Stand 10 feet away hold your hand up as hard as you can towards the muzzle and fire. What will the bullet do?Read the FBI Ballistics Manual. They talk about this. The amount of energy impacted on a target is equal to the amount of recoil of the weapon fired. It's Newton's law. You can go by people who actually conduct scientific tests or you can ignore it and go by myths created by people of the past in gun shops and by manufacturers trying to sell ammo. I used to think the same until I researched it for myself. The FBI aren't the only ones that dispelled these myths.
Full text of "fbi handgun wounding factors and effectiveness"