GOYABEAN
.950 JDJ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3e82/f3e8233e4b4e2e3a0f332f43db2437039f407e5f" alt="citizenfreepress.com"
18 children, teacher shot and killed at Texas elementary school…
Salvador Ramos — 5 Fast Facts Transgender teenager is Texas killer Watch Live | Biden Speaks Watch Live &nb…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68870/688700ee892ed5e4c563063dc6858152ff4b7bd9" alt="citizenfreepress.com"
Hardened entrances, bullerproof glass, one or 2 armed guards to cover an entire school, none of that will help.Now up to 18 kids and 2 adults dead
Also just confirmed that $100m is left in the budget that was issued to schools for COVID - unused
This money needs to be allocated to school
Security - hardened entrance, armed security, bullet proof glass - whatever
But that spare $100m already allocated for schools needs to be used
Would you be happier if they used bombs ?Well, the root cause is mental health but the simple fact is that after adjusting for population size the mass shootings in the USA are much higher than in other western nations. You can debate what the appropriate resolution is but in no other western nation can young men (the primary instigator of these events) so easily get semi automatic rifles, which are generally the gun used in the most egregious events.
For those saying the answer is armed security you’re wrong unless that security is walking around with a rifle, and protected in a manner to prevent being snuck up on and dispatched first. Tops had armed security and he failed to stop the slaughter.
That won't solve the problem. The Buffalo Tops had an armed guard, the shooters will plan for it. The shooters plan this stuff, they're mentally and morally defective, but not "stupid" (in the sense that they can't make a plan). 55 years ago you could order a gun shipped through the mail right to your door, no questions asked. We didn't have high school aged kids taking guns to schools and shooting them up then. It's a cultural issue and it's pathetic.I agree. Pass a law to mandate armed security in EVERY American school. That will do more to stop these situations than any amount of gun control.
If you're the English teacher and you hear the murderer coming down the hall, would you want to be armed with a can of soup or a gun ?”hardened entrance, armed security, bullet proof glass - whatever”
None of that will help?
NONE?
But arm the English teacher, the woodwork teacher who will need regular, repeated training and support and is expected to strap a gun to their hip in class in front of 8/9 year old kids and then engage the shooter once they have entered the classroom
I know of cops that have almost shit themselves trying to subdue a guy with a gun, but you want the teacher to be responsible
ok …….if you say so
If you're the English teacher and you hear the murderer coming down the hall, would you want to be armed with a can of soup or a gun”hardened entrance, armed security, bullet proof glass - whatever”
None of that will help?
NONE?
But arm the English teacher, the woodwork teacher who will need regular, repeated training and support and is expected to strap a gun to their hip in class in front of 8/9 year old kids and then engage the shooter once they have entered the classroom
I know of cops that have almost shit themselves trying to subdue a guy with a gun, but you want the teacher to be responsible
ok …….if you say so
I know plenty of teachers (or former teachers) who absolutely do want to be armed to be able to respond.They probably want neither
They may however prefer the ability to fully secure the door internally and remain in class
There is no way the average teacher wants to be armed and be held responsible for engaging an active shooter
How many active shootings do you see at say…….
banks
Tax office
DMV
airports
corporate offices in NYC
as an example
Why………….because they have armed guards ready to respond
I know plenty of teachers (or former teachers) who absolutely do want to be armed to be able to respond.
When the SHTF, good men want to be able to respond, not to cower and hope someone else shows up to "do something".
I'm not sure we want the sorts of people who don't to be teaching our kids.
The problem with that dataset is that they are conflating things that are most certainly not remotely like what we are discussing here.Before I get started here; the data file is attached to this post at the bottom as a zip file. This data set is only school shootings, so things like LAs Vegas, etc. aren't in here.
I pulled the Center for Homeland Defense and Security's K-12 School Shooting Database. I added a quick dashboard to make it easy to view the data. When you look at the data, handguns are the most common used weapon by far, followed by other (which I'm not quite sure what that data point is - maybe other weapons per the ATF?), and then the rest including rifles and shotguns are rarely used. In terms of people shot, over 80% of school shootings have either 0 or 1 person shot, about 60% of the time 1 person is shot. A 0 here would indicate that a weapon was discharged but nobody was injured. When including the 0 or 1 person shot data, on average a shooting done by a handgun has 1 person shot, and a shooting done with a rifle has an average of 2.16 people shot (Average Combined Killed and Wounded Chart).
It gets more pronounced when you look at the shootings where more than 1 person is shot (ie. 2+). Ignoring my personal opinion on it, this is why you always see people targeting what is commonly referred to as an "Assault Rifle". Rifle shootings are much rarer, but when they happen they are much worse on average. They are much more likely to end up being high impact events so they get more attention, sort of like how you don't hear about every car crash, but you sure do hear about every plane crash.
Also, if you look at the data, most of the school shootings (~95%) have 0-3 people being shot and that is almost entirely with handguns.... however most of these occur outside but on school property.
How does all of this relate to your post? Well, I'm not sure how much armed teachers will dissuade someone from shooting someone outside with a handgun (which is actually where most school shootings occur). I also doubt they will work against school shootings where semiautomatic rifle is used (and these are the "high-visibility" events) as the damaging capabilities of a rifle are typically higher and a shooter would definitely have an advantage over a teacher with a handgun. I'm not saying I'd rather have a can of soup over the handgun, I'm just somewhat skeptical of their ability to deter an attacker armed with a rifle.
All Shootings:
View attachment 159991
Shootings with 2+ shot.
View attachment 159992
If you're the English teacher and you hear the murderer coming down the hall, would you want to be armed with a can of soup or a gun
heARtyWhat kind of soup?
There is a good chance a lot of these same teachers carry on their own time.There is no way the average teacher wants to be armed and be held responsible for engaging an active shooter
I don't pretend to have any answers, but this is 100% correct. Also will add that there used to be gun racks with rifles and shotguns in many vehicles, and never any problems.We brought guns to school this never happened.
The problem is society,
Are these actually images of the murderer?Yeah right! The same parents who continue to allow this to be propagated by School Admins and the Board of Education.
View attachment 160004