They're here . . . Looks like we have fulfilled all of the backorders. Selling them over the counter now. I sold three yesterday. Come and get 'em.
Sig365
- Thread starter Saltwater60
- Start date
No this appears to have been a comment on one of his videos so grain of salt
And yet then there is a company known for budget friendly guns and build kits.
Here is how they handled things (notice they halted production)
Here is how they handled things (notice they halted production)
Im no detective but MAC made a video in June saying he bought his 3rd p365, then said the third on was made in November? Something smells...
When he tested the sig Legion he concluded the knock-off was more reliable, now 3 bad 365s in a row? I think he has an ax to grind with Sig.
Someone isnt reading everything. This isnt his 3rd one, this was a comment from his YouTube channel
Well he did a testing of both and the arex did better, how would you want him to conclude that?
Ah yes Tim "has an axe to grind" oh wait his favorite. 300blk pistol is a sig though.
Sounds to me that more likely than not Tim is holding sig to the standards they pretend to keep
But hey I get it, why not try to discredit someone who keeps on top of companies. Vs those who get hand selected test guns sent to them for free and send them back after a few hundred rounds
oops
So when will he report on the 3rd? Something still smells....
Already addressed this. He said he is waiting for 2019
So he buys a pistol and waits 6 months to shoot it? Hmmm...
Seems like the same problem and seen in this video of the 3rd shooter a limp wristing slide rider the first 2 shooters had no issue.
What? No he has only bought 2 this has been explained already, and is waiting until 2019 to buy a 3rd. It even says that in his post. Where are you getting the bought his 3rd and is waiting?
Ah yes Iraqv the guy who only reviews products after the manufacturer pays him $10,000
Maybe so, but the point is that the shooter can be the problem as demonstrated in the video. If he was dishonest would he even show the turd shoot?
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
Iraq gets guns sent to him to review directly from the manufacturer and gets paid for the review.
MAC buys his own and reviews them.
MAC buys his own and reviews them.
Go back to your posts # 271 and 272, You circled "3rd one" In the video you posted he stated he just bought one dated July manufacture. Pistol #1 was videoed in May pistol # 2 in June.
If I missed something let me know...
And he showed a shooter who had multiple problems, seems honest to me.
I then corrected myself
So where is his video on the 3rd pistol that was made in July, whats the wait.
Again there was no 3rd pistol, he said he has purchased 2 with his own money, both failed and he is going to wait until 2019 until he buys a 3rd
Since this seems to be trigonometry or something for you..
OK help me out at 6:20 he says he just bought that day and born on date of July. How is this not the 3rd pistol?
Did he say that he purchased his 3rd video? If so he also explains why and when he will review what ever.
The other post of someone saying theirs broke has nothing to do with MAC and the guns he owns
Yes he said its the 3rd 365 at 12:45 in the video you posted. If he said when he would test it I did not hear it. If he does have a BS story of why the wait I would love to hear it.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
No. Don't post that Edward. that guy is pretending to give it a fair shake. He is completely biased.
gun_slinger_boy
.338 Win Mag
This just occurred to me but... maybe 9mm is simply too much for the 365. Primer drag usually occurs when a round is extremely hot. You can observe this on pretty much any semi auto. If you reload an extremely hot round it can happen. It's because the action moves so fast that the firing pin hasn't had time to move back into its channel before the casing starts being ejected. You can also get bolt bounce which cause feeding malfunctions.
Since everyone seems to be shooting normal factory ammo it makes me wonder if 9mm is just too powerful for the 365. It could be the way it's built/materials. Or maybe it just needs a stronger recoil spring. Or maybe a combination of these. I would love to get my hands on one of these to experiment with different loads. I would bet even money that if I put powder puff loads in the 365 it wouldn't experience primer drag.
Since everyone seems to be shooting normal factory ammo it makes me wonder if 9mm is just too powerful for the 365. It could be the way it's built/materials. Or maybe it just needs a stronger recoil spring. Or maybe a combination of these. I would love to get my hands on one of these to experiment with different loads. I would bet even money that if I put powder puff loads in the 365 it wouldn't experience primer drag.
Marine Cpl
.577 Tyrannosaur.
I think that's why Glock usually has beefier and longer barrels and slides on their sub-compacts.
Sig had the right idea with the frame. They just need a bigger and beefier slide that'll get concealed in your pants anyway.
Edit. But then again the Shield is a 3in barrel and it performs just fine.
Maybe their recoil spring is too weak.
You are spot on about less striker drag with lighter loads I have pictures of spent cases showing less striker drag with my hand loads than factory ammo. I promise I will post them soon. As far as wrong caliber I don't agree. The only recurring issue I have seen with the earliest 365's has been striker falure. I feel this was caused by bad manufacturing and not bad engineering. I haven't seen all of the reviews nor do I give a rats ass what I read on the internet (because it must be true), I am speaking of personal experience. bTW I took my 365 to a class today and ran another 250 rounds through it. Still no problems from a pistol manufactured in early October.