Search results

I'd gladly jettison the 30% of the party that turns off 100% of the independents.

I hear ya.

Thats clever. "Mother of invention" and all that. For me if im grabbing a firearm with a light on it its a rifle,, but everyone has different situations and needs.

"Flag on the play! Double negative!" I don't not agree with what you're saying here. :)

Thats freakin' SWEET! :rock:

One way 'round the tourniquet law that doesnt exist is cauterization. (Had to). :flamethrower:

As I said many times- what does the dog do if he actually manages to catch the car? No fucking clue.

If you say so. I happen to think history, the document itself, and the intent of the law is not on your side. One of the penalties of impeachment is debarment from holding federal office again. If someone could slip that penalty by merely resigning before they could be impeached and...

In 1876, the House impeached ex-Secretary of War William Belknap after he resigned from office over a corruption scandal. What is more, as the legal scholar Brian C. Kalt notes in his exhaustive study, "The Constitutional Case for the Impeachability of Former Federal Officials," "the House...

It's entirely constitutional to do so.

The public needs protection from the general government of this state.

OMG its delka hlavne is like 140 mm!!!! :rolleyes: You know Edward if I had money just sitting around, I might get me a 97. Just because. No real reason, just to have one.

Would've been nice to continue the multidecade run of GOP wins in GA but... alas. There are kraken amongst us.

Once again I invoke Godwin's Law.

Thats the point. He's been sitting on a treasure trove of dirt for four years? Why? Or does it simply not exist?

Free beer. Tomorrow. Again. And free shots of Kraken.

Once again we see that executive branch action is fleeting at best and can be undone by the next guy. If only we had some kind of deliberative body that could formulate, debate, and enect laws that would survive one executive order to the next. Oh well.

No staff and no USSS security detail as well.

Impeached and convicted = no post-presidency perks.

Still no joy on my red dot and magnifier. USPS a holes.

+1 and good on you guys for continuing this tradition. I dont have anything to offer up at the moment as my office/shop is a mess i.e. I dont even really know what I have right now.

Whats easier to reload- a locked back auto or an empty revolver?

Thats their choice. Tells me what I want to know about them.

Maybe some of you should actually go read 230 and report back on what it actually says and does.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes::rolleyes:

There's a function in there somewhere where you can download all of your data. I haven't been on Facebook in years but just in case you run into trouble grabbing your stuff I know somewhere on there is a function to bundle and bulk download your own stuff.

No. I asked if you had a problem with the forum being COMPELLED to provide a platform for speech it disagrees with.

The argument that Twitter should be forced to keep accounts they do not want to keep is tantamount to requiring that NYGF have a section for anti-gun talk even though its obviously antithetical to the principles of this site. Freedom of speech also includes the right to not be forced to promote...

So you'd be in favor of compulsory speech, and violating the owners' of this site's right to freedom of association? Because ultimately, those are what these arguments are in favor of, not "free speech."

Twitter and the rest deplatforming these people is not "censorship" nor is it it a "free speech" issue. It's a freedom of association issue. Would you also have NYGF be forced to provide a platform for anti-gun folks? Not directed at you, FRB, just a thought I have everytime these people yell...

Yes, and a long time registered Democrat. Not that I'm not (strategically). But I've sure as shit never given them any money.

Kinda missed my point.

What (in your opinion) was he being asked to do? Hell that Gohmert lawsuit specifically seeks it as relief. I'm pretty sure if the Vice President of the United States could sua sponte decide who won the election, Richard Nixon would have done it in 1960.

OK so point blank is Mike Pence "guilty of treason" and should be tried and executed?

Seriously? I need to go thru it? It doesn't speak for itself?

Lin Wood was a long-time donor to Democrats, you are aware of this yes?

It's not that hard. What do any of these people want? Publicity and money. What got raised between election day and the end of December, something like 200 million? And Rudy was billing out what, five figures a day (which incidentally is NOT unreasonable depending on what you're working on...

That is "heard." Just because you don't get to a jury or bench decision doesn't mean you didn't get your shot. There are probably hundreds if not thousands of cases that get tossed out at the preliminary stage every year- because they're dog shit cases. They had their shots in court. They...

I was referring to the psychosis that is Lin Wood's (former) twitter feed.

Ballots- or applications for absentee ballots? You have proof of this mass mail in actual ballot fraud you speak of? Can we... see that evidence please?

If you repeat something you know is a lie, is that bad?

A lot of people around here have been throwing around words like "treason" and "sedition" for years and years and I keep getting confirmation that they've never had any idea what those words really mean, day after day. And I'm also confused- was it an Antifa-Soros-Lizard People conspiracy the...

I think Pence is too tainted by Trump to be ABLE to win.

Same.

Once again. Impeachment is a political function. It is not a criminal or civil litigation proceeding.

Well said.

^^^What he said.

Incorrect.

They heard them. They found them sorely lacking.

Twitter =/= the government so no censorship there. :deadhorse::deadhorse::deadhorse::deadhorse: